NYPD Trial: cop's tape reveals boss told him to target black men age 17-21

the mechanic

Greasy philosophy
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,472
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,916
lol man fukk all that "stop the powerless shyt"

the law is only wrong because it targets ALL black kids 17-21

target the right ppl, and nobody is trying to defend their rights

:duck:

You havent actually read the legislation in question...have you??
 

the mechanic

Greasy philosophy
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,472
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,916
mistyped my age brackets but nah I actually have not

have I read summaries over the legislation, yes, have I sat down and piled through it myself nah

Stop and frisk doesnt really specify race or age...what it does is give the police the authority to go fishing for criminals by stopping any member of the public without probable cause..they can basically set up a checkpoint on the sidewalk if they wanted to.

Why is this a problem? Because now instead of doing actual policing like patrols and investigation the cops are just frisking people to"prevent" crime..people who would normally not commit any crimes but have contraband will go to jail..Young black men are also more likely to be targeted as subjects of these searches.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,318
Reputation
6,840
Daps
90,817
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Stop and frisk doesnt really specify race or age...what it does is give the police the authority to go fishing for criminals by stopping any member of the public without probable cause..they can basically set up a checkpoint on the sidewalk if they wanted to.

Why is this a problem? Because now instead of doing actual policing like patrols and investigation the cops are just frisking people to"prevent" crime..people who would normally not commit any crimes but have contraband will go to jail..Young black men are also more likely to be targeted as subjects of these searches.

right right...my point revolved around the articles statement "A top Bronx cop was caught on tape telling an NYPD whistleblower to specifically target “male blacks 14 to 21” for stop-and-frisk because they commit crimes."

this is no different than the search and seize policy carried out on the I95 (its name escapes me right now)

Obviously in theory its wrong lol. But why can't we admit, the only reason its wrong is because the innocent are targeted, the innocent feel victimized and that resources could be better allocated toward helping "at risk" children/populations.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
If i were a black cop I'd post up in a good neighbor hood and start friskin folks...

I guess we just don't do the whole probable cause and illegal search and seizure.

Incidentally isn't this unconstitutional?
 

the mechanic

Greasy philosophy
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,472
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,916
If i were a black cop I'd post up in a good neighbor hood and start friskin folks...

I guess we just don't do the whole probable cause and illegal search and seizure.

Incidentally isn't this unconstitutional?

Nope Not according to them

As for the constitutionality of stop-and-frisk, it all turns on the 1968 Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio. Police can legally conduct a Terry search when they have a "reasonable suspicion" that the subject has committed a crime or is about to commit a crime. Do the New York police have legitimate cause to suspect between one and two thousand individuals of criminal behavior every day?

The ACLU trying to fight it..i hope they win but it looks more and more like the days when cops used investigation and evidence to stop crime are coming to an end....now they just fish for "suspects"
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
Nope Not according to them



The ACLU trying to fight it..i hope they win but it looks more and more like the days when cops used investigation and evidence to stop crime are coming to an end....now they just fish for "suspects"

They are still pushing that shyt here in AZ too. "reasonable suspicion"...
cop - "uh, he's black"


That's some fuked up shyt.

also....
Mark my words these cases going up for "reasonable suspicion" will later be used when we have "minority report" type technology.

Ever since Bush this country has nose dove into "preemptive" madness
 

NYChase718

Veteran
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
30,475
Reputation
3,240
Daps
107,174
Reppin
NULL
You know what I find funny?
Gangsters and cops both call snitches within their organizations Rats...

Coincidence, i think not...

the-departed.jpg


:mjpls:
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,041
Daps
43,613
Reppin
Los Angeles
You know what I find funny?
Gangsters and cops both call snitches within their organizations Rats...

Coincidence, i think not...

Well yea because alot of these administrator are from mob neighborhoods and many cops are rough around the edges. Growing up among demonic individuals, its not uncommon for them to have actually been apart of that life and in some very scary scenarios, still are.

I got pulled over in l.a by an officer and while they were checking me out he was asking me about computer printers. I noticed his hand was tatted up in the corner. Im like whats up with those tats, hes says to me......

Former life.... :demonic:

Its so demonic, friends. :sitdown:
 

the mechanic

Greasy philosophy
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,472
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,916
Ever since Bush this country has nose dove into "preemptive" madness

So true..the worst bush legacy i think is he entrenched and normalized the concept of preemptive violence

Sadly too many people think its ok as long as it makes them feel "safer"
 
Top