Do we need a North Korea megathread too
North Korea Thread: DPRK Launching Missiles With New ICBM
- Thread starter newarkhiphop
- Start date
Do we need a North Korea megathread too
Send in Dennis rodman
JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
Do we need a North Korea megathread too
If they do that, won't North Korea let them thangs fly at South Korea and the U.S. forces there?
JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
buying opportunity... transferring money into my brokerage account 
ZoeGod
I’m from Brooklyn a place where stars are born.
They don't only have nukes but a lot of chemical and biological weapons. They would fill artillery shells and ballistic missiles with sarin and vx and target Seoul and the DMZ. They would lose in a war but it would be very costly with millions dead and cities becoming unliveable.
ill
Superstar
China 'not obliged to defend North Korea from an attack'
China is not obliged to help defend North Korea as the latter's development of nuclear weapons has breached a mutual defence pact, Chinese diplomatic and military observers told the South China Morning Post (SCMP).
China and North Korea signed a mutual aid and cooperation treaty in 1961 as they sought to mount a united front against Western powers. Renewed in 1981 and 2001, the treaty is valid until 2021.
The Sino-North Korean Mutual Aid and Cooperation Friendship Treaty stipulates that one country must immediately take military and all other necessary measures to oppose any country or coalition of countries that might attack either nation. But the treaty also says that both nations should safeguard peace and security.
Observers told the SCMP that North Korea's development of nuclear weapons in violation of the United Nations treaty on non-proliferation could amount to a breach of the pact. This means that Beijing is not obliged to help defend North Korea from a military attack, they told the paper.
"It is hard to say how China would assist North Korea militarily in case of war, since North Korea is developing nuclear weapons, an act that might have already breached the treaty between the two nations," said retired Chinese naval colonel Li Jie.
In the case of Pyongyang initiating an attack, China would not be obliged to get involved, said Professor Cai Jian of Fudan University.
Mr Antony Wong Dong, a Macau- based military analyst, said that when the treaty was last renewed, China warned North Korea that it must take responsibility for its own behaviour.
"There won't be a second Korean war," Mr Wong told the SCMP.
The Global Times, which is published by the Communist Party's People's Daily, said in an editorial that the best option for North Korea and its leader Kim Jong Un was for the country to give up its nuclear programme, and China would protect North Korea if it did, reported Reuters.
"As soon as North Korea complies with China's declared advice and suspends nuclear activities... China will actively work to protect the security of a denuclearised North Korean nation and regime," said the Global Times.
China is not obliged to help defend North Korea as the latter's development of nuclear weapons has breached a mutual defence pact, Chinese diplomatic and military observers told the South China Morning Post (SCMP).
China and North Korea signed a mutual aid and cooperation treaty in 1961 as they sought to mount a united front against Western powers. Renewed in 1981 and 2001, the treaty is valid until 2021.
The Sino-North Korean Mutual Aid and Cooperation Friendship Treaty stipulates that one country must immediately take military and all other necessary measures to oppose any country or coalition of countries that might attack either nation. But the treaty also says that both nations should safeguard peace and security.
Observers told the SCMP that North Korea's development of nuclear weapons in violation of the United Nations treaty on non-proliferation could amount to a breach of the pact. This means that Beijing is not obliged to help defend North Korea from a military attack, they told the paper.
"It is hard to say how China would assist North Korea militarily in case of war, since North Korea is developing nuclear weapons, an act that might have already breached the treaty between the two nations," said retired Chinese naval colonel Li Jie.
In the case of Pyongyang initiating an attack, China would not be obliged to get involved, said Professor Cai Jian of Fudan University.
Mr Antony Wong Dong, a Macau- based military analyst, said that when the treaty was last renewed, China warned North Korea that it must take responsibility for its own behaviour.
"There won't be a second Korean war," Mr Wong told the SCMP.
The Global Times, which is published by the Communist Party's People's Daily, said in an editorial that the best option for North Korea and its leader Kim Jong Un was for the country to give up its nuclear programme, and China would protect North Korea if it did, reported Reuters.
"As soon as North Korea complies with China's declared advice and suspends nuclear activities... China will actively work to protect the security of a denuclearised North Korean nation and regime," said the Global Times.
ill
Superstar
NKorea missile ‘could hit Australia in two years’
US war propaganda machine making sure to get our allies on board
US war propaganda machine making sure to get our allies on board
Red Shield
Global Domination
Seoul can kiss it's ass goodbye if the usa tries something 
ill
Superstar
Presidential Candidates Unveil Views on US Preemptive Strike in TV Debate
In their first TV debate on Thursday, the nation's five presidential candidates revealed how they would respond to a U.S. preemptive strike against North Korea.
Moon Jae-in of the main opposition Democratic Party said he would call the U.S. president and urge him to put the preemptive strike on hold while stressing that the U.S. should not seek unilateral attack without Seoul’s consent. Moon then stressed that he would cooperate with China on the matter.
Ahn Cheol-soo of the minor People’s Party said he would first talk to the leaders of the U.S. and China. Ahn said he would tell Trump, who is a fellow alumni of the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, that a war should never occur and would call on Chinese President Xi Jinping to exert pressure on Pyongyang.
Hong Joon-pyo of the conservative Liberty Korea Party said the most important thing would be to consult with the U.S. so that a preemptive strike does not take place. If such a strike were to occur, Hong said he would alert the entire military and immediately launch operations to regain the northern territory.
Yoo Seong-min of the Bareun Party said a preemptive strike is a preventive self-defense action that would be taken when the North’s attack against South Korea is imminent. He then said because the matter requires close coordination between Seoul and Washington, a candidate who places importance on security must become president.
Sim Sang-jung of the Justice Party said that no military action should take place on the Korean Peninsula under any circumstances. She said that she would speak over the phone with the leaders of the U.S. and China and dispatch a special envoy to voice the need for a peaceful resolution of the situation on the peninsula.
The presidential TV debate, organized by the Journalists Association of Korea, was held at an SBS TV studio in western Seoul.
In their first TV debate on Thursday, the nation's five presidential candidates revealed how they would respond to a U.S. preemptive strike against North Korea.
Moon Jae-in of the main opposition Democratic Party said he would call the U.S. president and urge him to put the preemptive strike on hold while stressing that the U.S. should not seek unilateral attack without Seoul’s consent. Moon then stressed that he would cooperate with China on the matter.
Ahn Cheol-soo of the minor People’s Party said he would first talk to the leaders of the U.S. and China. Ahn said he would tell Trump, who is a fellow alumni of the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, that a war should never occur and would call on Chinese President Xi Jinping to exert pressure on Pyongyang.
Hong Joon-pyo of the conservative Liberty Korea Party said the most important thing would be to consult with the U.S. so that a preemptive strike does not take place. If such a strike were to occur, Hong said he would alert the entire military and immediately launch operations to regain the northern territory.
Yoo Seong-min of the Bareun Party said a preemptive strike is a preventive self-defense action that would be taken when the North’s attack against South Korea is imminent. He then said because the matter requires close coordination between Seoul and Washington, a candidate who places importance on security must become president.
Sim Sang-jung of the Justice Party said that no military action should take place on the Korean Peninsula under any circumstances. She said that she would speak over the phone with the leaders of the U.S. and China and dispatch a special envoy to voice the need for a peaceful resolution of the situation on the peninsula.
The presidential TV debate, organized by the Journalists Association of Korea, was held at an SBS TV studio in western Seoul.
SuikodenII
Where's Suikoden VI??????
They're also on North Korea's border and have friendly governments with strategic interests.
Schindler is such a loser.
