I find that to be silly, given that weapon and empty hand training are intrinsically intertwined in martial arts training. A great example is the jujutsu you love and kenjutsu, for example, or fencing and boxing, or bajiquan and the spear. Don't disparage the training of weapons, friend. Weapons are just extensions of the body. And it is no surprise that many of the greatest empty hand fighters of the past were also masters with one or many weapons, and vice-versa.
Well to me, this is my opinion, if you're nice with a sword but get the crap beat out of you with your hands i cant say that you're really a bad ass. I dont respect the vikings. They were mauraders who preyed on the weak and even they knew their limitations. There were certain areas in europe that had real nikkas they wouldnt even consider fukkin with. At the same time, europe had a lot weak people in general so its easy to paint the picture of them being these badasses when they were going up against weaklines.
considering their populations, the gap in technology they had between a lot of their opponents, and their general goals (to power their own resource lacking society by taking from others, they did quite alright. I agree that there is a lot of romanticizing of their abilities as "noble savages", but there is just as much downplaying of their culture, art, technology, and skills.



and at the same time i cant romanticize these people as you said because theres no reason too. They did some raiding and marauding but again a lot of the ass kicking they performed was against the weak. This notion that they conquered Europe is a joke because in many cases they worked with other europeans and helped them. Having settlements is far from conquering and ruling nations. 

