FeverPitch2
Superstar
How would he have achieved that?
Nikki Haley out here engaging in anti black racism
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
CrownHeights
Superstar
You can't expect these dudes on here to want to learn anything when all they do is troll and lust over fake booty whores all day
Neither did his. The unmitigated gallAsked about Scott’s messaging, Obama said there was sometimes a tendency among Republican candidates to gloss over the effects of racism, arguing that candidates need to address racial disparities to be taken seriously on the subject of American unity.
“There’s a long history of African American or other minority candidates within the Republican party who will validate America and say, ‘Everything’s great, and we can make it,’” Obama told the Democratic strategist David Axelrod on the CNN-hosted Axe Files. He added that he thought Nikki Haley “has a similar approach”.
Obama said that approach does not include “a plan for how do we address crippling generational poverty that is a consequence of hundreds of years of racism in this society, and we need to do something about that.
“If that candidate is not willing to acknowledge that, again and again, we’ve seen discrimination in everything from … getting a job to buying a house to how the criminal justice system operates,” he added.
-The Guardian
Here is the podcast link: The race discussion is from 40:00 to 47:30. He talks about what Fox News has done to scare white people. The Tim Scott/Nikki Haley part starts at 43:30.
Ep. 538 — President Barack Obama - The Axe Files with David Axelrod - Podcast on CNN Audio
Since leaving office in 2016, former President Barack Obama has been a careful observer of the ebbs and flows of democracy around the globe, speaking out on the subject and building coalitions through the Obama Foundation. President Obama joined David to talk about the state of democracy at home...www.cnn.com
Nikki Haley, asked what caused the Civil War, leaves out slavery. It's not the first time
MEG KINNARDWed, December 27, 2023 at 11:32 PM EST
Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley speaks during a town hall, Monday, Dec. 18, 2023, in Nevada, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley was asked Wednesday by a New Hampshire voter about the reason for the Civil War, and she didn’t mention slavery in her response — leading the voter to say he was “astonished” by her omission.
Asked during a town hall in Berlin, New Hampshire, what she believed had caused the war — the first shots of which were fired in her home state of South Carolina — Haley talked about the role of government, replying that it involved “the freedoms of what people could and couldn't do.”
She then turned the question back to the man who had asked it, who replied that he was not the one running for president and wished instead to know her answer.
After Haley went into a lengthier explanation about the role of government, individual freedom and capitalism, the questioner seemed to admonish Haley, saying, “In the year 2023, it’s astonishing to me that you answer that question without mentioning the word slavery.”
“What do you want me to say about slavery?" Haley retorted, before abruptly moving on to the next question.
Haley, who served six years as South Carolina's governor, has been competing for a distant second place to Donald Trump for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. She has frequently said during her campaign that she would compete in the first three states before returning “to the sweet state of South Carolina, and we’ll finish it” in the Feb. 24 primary.
Haley's campaign did not immediately return a message seeking comment on her response. The campaign of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, another of Haley's GOP foes, recirculated video of the exchange on social media, adding the comment, “Yikes.”
Issues surrounding the origins of the Civil War and its heritage are still much of the fabric of Haley’s home state, and she has been pressed on the war’s origins before. As she ran for governor in 2010, Haley, in an interview with a now-defunct activist group then known as The Palmetto Patriots, described the war as between two disparate sides fighting for “tradition” and “change” and said the Confederate flag was “not something that is racist.” During that same campaign, she dismissed the need for the flag to come down from the Statehouse grounds, portraying her Democratic rival’s push for its removal as a desperate political stunt. Five years later, Haley urged lawmakers to remove the flag from its perch near a Confederate soldier monument following a mass shooting in which a white gunman killed eight Black church members who were attending Bible study. At the time, Haley said the flag had been “hijacked” by the shooter from those who saw the flag as symbolizing “sacrifice and heritage.” South Carolina’s Ordinance of Secession — the 1860 proclamation by the state government outlining its reasons for seceding from the Union — mentions slavery in its opening sentence and points to the “increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery” as a reason for the state removing itself from the Union.
On Wednesday night, Christale Spain — elected this year as the first Black woman to chair South Carolina’s Democratic Party — said Haley’s response was “vile, but unsurprising.” “The same person who refused to take down the Confederate Flag until the tragedy in Charleston, and tried to justify a Confederate History Month," Spain said in a post on X, of Haley. “She’s just as MAGA as Trump,” Spain added, referring to Trump's ”Make America Great Again" slogan. Jaime Harrison, current chairman of the Democratic National Committee and South Carolina's party chairman during part of Haley's tenure as governor, said her response was “not stunning if you were a Black resident in SC when she was Governor." “Same person who said the confederate flag was about tradition & heritage and as a minority woman she was the right person to defend keeping it on state house grounds,” Harrison posted Wednesday night on X. “Some may have forgotten but I haven’t. Time to take off the rose colored Nikki Haley glasses folks.” ___
One of our fellow posters agrees with her, btw. This is conservative brain rot.
That's a total lie, by the way. There was no tariffs increase passed nor would there have been (the North didn't have the votes), and in the very first paragraph of the speech @David_TheMan quoted, Lincoln explicitly says that the South seceded because they though Lincoln was going to ban slavery.
The last time we argued about this, he quoted an actual neo-Confederate historian whose entire book he claims to have read to support his case.
That's a total lie, by the way. There was no tariffs increase passed nor would there have been (the North didn't have the votes), and in the very first paragraph of the speech @David_TheMan quoted, Lincoln explicitly says that the South seceded because they though Lincoln was going to ban slavery.
The last time we argued about this, he quoted an actual neo-Confederate historian whose entire book he claims to have read to support his case.
One of our fellow posters agrees with her, btw. This is conservative brain rot.
That's a total lie, by the way. There was no tariffs increase passed nor would there have been (the North didn't have the votes), and in the very first paragraph of the speech @David_TheMan quoted, Lincoln explicitly says that the South seceded because they though Lincoln was going to ban slavery.
The last time we argued about this, he quoted an actual neo-Confederate historian whose entire book he claims to have read to support his case.
No way he's Black writing that drivel..
One of our fellow posters agrees with her, btw. This is conservative brain rot.
That's a total lie, by the way. There was no tariffs increase passed nor would there have been (the North didn't have the votes), and in the very first paragraph of the speech @David_TheMan quoted, Lincoln explicitly says that the South seceded because they though Lincoln was going to ban slavery.
The last time we argued about this, he quoted an actual neo-Confederate historian whose entire book he claims to have read to support his case.
@David_TheMan, bring your white ass in here and explain.
He's explained it before. He full-on believes the neo-Confederate claims that the war was all about economics, not slavery. He's a hardcore conservative from the deep south who went to a higher-end majority white high school and he was taught all that shyt by his conservative friends and ate it up. For evidence, he uses the various shyt that Lincoln said to try to pacify the South, ignoring that Lincoln obviously had to say he wasn't going to get rid of slavery in order to avoid the war. Even those very statements from Lincoln explicitly state that the South was seceding BECAUSE THEY THOUGHT HE WAS GOING TO END SLAVERY, that's why Lincoln was trying to convince them that he wouldn't do it so they'll come back into the union. @David_TheMan can't tell the difference between political speeches intended to attain an obvious objective, and what was really going on.
But the same time he uses Lincoln's early attempts to pacify the South as "proof" that the war wasn't about slavery, he ignores the Southern leaders' own words saying the war was about slavery and their official statements in their own declarations of independence from the Constitution. He also ignored Lincoln's later statements, when he admitted that everyone knew the war had been about slavery the whole time.
No way he's Black writing that drivel..
It's impossible to tell for sure, but from some of the things he'd said, I'd believe that he's Black. There are insane, confused, deceived people of every race.
Him being a hardcore Ron Paul stan and claiming Ron Paul is going to save the country is the most suspect thing he's said, but if you accept that, it explains all the rest.
Has he ever provided proof that he's Black? A litany of white posters on here have been busted for cosplaying Black on here. I'm not giving @David_TheMan the benefit of the doubt, especially when his posts are uniform to that of a racist cac.
Voice of Reason
Veteran
Right it's crazy that these cacs and slavery apologists straight up ignore the "The Declaration of Causes of succeeding states"
The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States
The Declaration of Causes made by Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas.
They literally say that slavery is the main cause.
Last edited:
Right it's crazy that this cacs and slavery apologists straight up ignore the "The Declaration of Causes of succeeding states"
The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States
The Declaration of Causes made by Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas.www.battlefields.org
They literally say that slavery is the main cause.
She's as bad as DeSantis and his trying to rewrite Black history to save the dignity of Whites.
But, yet she's an Indian fron India just like Ramaswamy. Indians are as vile as cacs with their anti Blackness.
It's actually enshrined in Indian culture with the caste system.
I suspect Haley is one of those northern pale face Indians.
David_TheMan
Banned
Not white and I stated what i believe.
I even have a open challenge ban bet on my profile page with you.
I prove I'm black you take kill this account.
Let me know when you are ready to take it up.
Until then have a good one.
Damn a good nap post. Congrats napijder
MustafaSTL
Achievement In Every Field of Human Endeavor
So about what @Rhakim posted….