The company never claimed they had Nike's blessings. They didn't advertise them that way either. If this was more than just an attempt to strong-arm, they would have named Nas X in the suit too.Bullshyt. Nike caught flack for this and people threatened to boycott the company. You are a terrible fake lawyer. He was using a product made by nike
They are using a Nike product. If someone uses a song I made without my permission they are getting sued. It’s a Nike shoe. People know it’s a Nike shoe. You are jeopardizing my company with this stunt.The company never claimed they had Nike's blessings. They didn't advertise them that way either. If this was more than just an attempt to strong-arm, they would have named Nas X in the suit too.
For the last time, goofass... The point is, it's all or nothing: the general public has OBVIOUSLY no idea the difference between what Nike releases and what they collab with. If they did, Nike wouldn't be suing. They can't have it both ways and expect not to get backlash when they ok some collabs or look the other way and then fein outrage when you got some fukk that decides to spark controversy.nike does OFFICIAL collaborations THOSE are good for them and they claim those. you got a nonsensical brain my dude. you know it happens? apparently not. look at what you wrote. "it was obviously a bad decision" nike has no involvement in this custom design, that's your issue. you don't seem to get that.
when nike does a collaboration nike makes the shoe the people they collaborate with don't. they collaborate on the design so they have involvement.
when someone buys nikes and customizes them themselves nike is not involved in that process. hence the terms official collaboration and customization. this is a customization of a retail product after market not one made, approved or endorsed by nike.
Sue that fakk0t
Your a idiot lolFor the last time, goofass... The point is, it's all or nothing: the general public has OBVIOUSLY no idea the difference between what Nike releases and what they collab with. If they did, Nike wouldn't be suing. They can't have it both ways and expect not to get backlash when they ok some collabs or look the other way and then fein outrage when you got some fukk that decides to spark controversy.
Two things:
1. Highly doubt nike is going to take any money from Mischief nor Lil Nas Esco Junior.
2. Not a single person here can tell me how they got the blood/fluid into the soles without compromising the pressure PSI's.
And to get 666 shoes?
Btw, what was the original air max 97 colorway that they somehow miraculous acquired over 600 pairs from.
I still think Nike was involved.
Sticking to it.
That's still blasphemy though. That can be seen as damaging as well if people were interested in being honest.