Newspaper ad from 1799 sought negro wench, mates

[Jesus]

Good.
This is the era of everyone being offended by everything.

fukk it.

Watch your mouth, spic.

 

[Broke Wave]

That was one of the facets of Whitening.

You cant even resist whitening with resisting Ir marriages because it was a forced policy. So why does resisting ir marriages stop this imagined whitening? Has America been getting whiter over the last 50 years or less so?

 

[Jesus]

Nope, clearly they booked bucks and wenches for those wild and crazy Yorktown Sex Club orgies. Food and drink along with generous competitive wages for the twelve to fifty-two year olds. Free on-site daycare for the pickaninny.

January 10,1855......that's my birthday. Thank God I was born in the 21st century.

 

[Poitier]

You cant even resist whitening with resisting Ir marriages because it was a forced policy. So why does resisting ir marriages stop this imagined whitening? Has America been getting whiter over the last 50 years or less so?

I already gave the qualifier of 40% or above so I am obviously not talking about now.

 

[Broke Wave]

Lmao

@Roddy Right @Poitier

http://blackdemographics.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Population-2-chart-1790-to-2012.jpg?f90701

Thanks for this... In the 50 years since the end of IR laws... The black population has DOUBLED lmao

debate is over

 

[Broke Wave]

I already gave the qualifier of 40% or above so I am obviously not talking about now.

Well we will cross that bridge when we get there but we are so far away from that point its futile to worry about it. America still lives behing the old lines of segregation.

 

[Poitier]

Lmao

@Roddy Right @Poitier

http://blackdemographics.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Population-2-chart-1790-to-2012.jpg?f90701

Thanks for this... In the 50 years since the end of IR laws... The black population has DOUBLED lmao

debate is over

What does this prove? This is true of every race not Natives.

 

[Broke Wave]

What does this prove? This is true of every race not Natives.

It proves that Ir mixing laws were not responsible for the growth of the black community, as stated by this dude. Now after all this mixing, blacks are at their highest percentage of the population since slavery.

 

[Poitier]

It proves that Ir mixing laws were not responsible for the growth of the black community, as stated by this dude. Now after all this mixing, blacks are at their highest percentage of the population since slavery.

I never argued this. Obviously racial attitudes towards IR and migration are important.

 

[Broke Wave]

I never argued this. Obviously racial attitudes towards IR and migration are important.

Then those should be the values you translate to your children and family... This hysteria over interracial marriages or "bedwenches" etc is utter nonsense

 

[godkiller]

I admit I was wrong about the total mumbers in Brazil vis a vis the carribean, butt omce again you are factually incorrect. Simply because these countries started out as majority slave or with large numbers of slaves in relation to the white population, as did america, does not mean that the white population grew simply as a result of whitening. White immigration to these countries, and especially America was massive.

White immigration and IR is how these countries whitened, but is not the only vehicle. Brazil's population today is MIXED, which de facto means that blacks were a vehicle to whitening via IR. That is, the mixed population's existence implies the black population was REDUCED through IR (otherwise the black population would be higher as the group wouldn't mix). Moreover the black population in Argentina was also REDUCED through IR with no other explanation for their disappearance.

You are relating interracial marrage to a variety of different issues without showing any kind of causation. Just because the black population ROSE before racial mixing laws, does not directly link the population stall to racial mixing laws. That is not how evidence works. You are making the link between racial "purity" and high birth rates and countries like Finland etc prove otherwise. How could you possibly make that link and talk about the era pre contraception and abortion, skip over that, and pick one thing and say that was it? Its like if I blamed the stall on birthrates on the NBA ABA merger.

This paragraph doesn't even make sense. When IR demographics and policies are correlated everywhere with low and reduced black people's numbers while anti-IR demographics and policies are correlated with high and increased black people's numbers, common sense must prevail.

In the USA we have an example of what whitening policies and IR! did to the Natives. In Canada we have an example of what whitening policies and IR! did to the Natives. In Australia we have an example of what whitening policies and IR! did to the Natives. How many more examples do you need to show that IR is part of whitening? What, do you want a controlled experiment? You're either idiotic or dishonest.

As far as black canadians... Being one, from Toronto, who had lived there for 20 years, in a mostly black neighborhood, thanks for your educational lecture.

I'm from Toronto too and from a black neighborhood, and I stand by everything I said. Other blacks on the forum, including Reincarr and malcolm and MostInfamous, have echoed the same sentiments. Blacks can't even hang out with blacks in Toronto because there are so few blacks. In addition, black Canadians blacks have no political power, no representation privately and publicly, no culture, no people (cut 8% in half and that's the number of blacks there), no professional representation (see below) and discrimination in jobs and otherwise is commonplace (see Toronto study) :



"Discrimination a daily reality for visible minority lawyers in Ontario, report says"

Law society data show black lawyers disproportionately practise in the smallest firms. Relatively few black lawyers practise in the largest firms.

“There are firms that believe if they hire black lawyers they will lose their clients,” one participant said.

Finally, once again you are making this LA/NY et al is worse for blacks than the deep south, without ANY statistical evidence. The evidence showes that actually blacks are poorest in deep south with the lowest of all other indicators, despite likely being the most ethnically homogenous.

[/quote][/quote]

Like I said above, what I say is common sense but if you need numbers to help you understand the trends, so be it:

Source: EPI analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) data and Current Population Survey (CPS) data

Black Unemployment Rate Dips Below 10 Percent in 11 of 24 States Measured in Second Quarter

In support of my assertions, Black unemployment rate in California is higher than every Deep Southern state including Alabama, Missisippi and Georgia, despite the fact the blacks in California are self-selected for being the blacks who choose to stay in California (which means they are more likely to have been employed in the first place), whereas states like Alabama, Missippi and Georgia are seeing an influx of blacks (which means the black unemployment rate there is inflated for new arrivals).

If the blacks who left California chose to stay instead, the California rate would actually be higher than it is right now, which as mentioned above is already higher than Alabama, Mississippi and Georgia. If blacks stopped going to the Deep South, the unemployment rate would lower. In other words, California is RIGHT NOW worse off for blacks in terms of unemployment relative to the Deep South, and in TRUTH would be WORSE if so many blacks didn't LEAVE.

There, data to corroborate common sense.

 

[Poitier]

Then those should be the values you translate to your children and family... This hysteria over interracial marriages or "bedwenches" etc is utter nonsense

IR is an simply an indicator that should be tracked.

 

[godkiller]

Lmao

@Roddy Right @Poitier

http://blackdemographics.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Population-2-chart-1790-to-2012.jpg?f90701

Thanks for this... In the 50 years since the end of IR laws... The black population has DOUBLED lmao

debate is over

Your post doesn't prove anything. Blacks historically have low IR anyway (which is how we got to this point) and that hasn't much changed in the last 50 years (but is changing and that's what we're talking about) . People only started really dating IR statistically in the 90s. Before that, it didn't happen on a statistical level (which means it barely did).

So technological improvements along with an anti-IR American culture (driven by hitherto hundred year policy) has led to the black population rising. This supports my point that policy (and thereafter anti-IR American culture) has led to black American survival and thriving.

Bedwenching in the 80s didn't even really exist.

 

[Broke Wave]

White immigration and IR is how these countries whitened, but is not the only vehicle. Brazil's population today is MIXED, which de facto means that blacks were a vehicle to whitening via IR. That is, the mixed population's existence implies the black population was REDUCED through IR (otherwise the black population would be higher as the group wouldn't mix). Moreover the black population in Argentina was also REDUCED through IR with no other explanation for their disappearance.



This paragraph doesn't even make sense. When IR demographics and policies are correlated everywhere with low and reduced black people's numbers while anti-IR demographics and policies are correlated with high and increased black people's numbers, common sense must prevail.

In the USA we have an example of what whitening policies and IR! did to the Natives. In Canada we have an example of what whitening policies and IR! did to the Natives. In Australia we have an example of what whitening policies and IR! did to the Natives. How many more examples do you need to show that IR is part of whitening? What, do you want a controlled experiment? You're either idiotic or dishonest.

Like I said above, what I say is common sense but if you need numbers to help you understand the trends, so be it:

Source: EPI analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) data and Current Population Survey (CPS) data

Black Unemployment Rate Dips Below 10 Percent in 11 of 24 States Measured in Second Quarter

In support of my assertions, Black unemployment rate in California is higher than every Deep Southern state including Alabama, Missisippi and Georgia, despite the fact the blacks in California are self-selected for being the blacks who choose to stay in California (which means they are more likely to have been employed in the first place), whereas states like Alabama, Missippi and Georgia are seeing an influx of blacks (which means the black unemployment rate there is inflated for new arrivals).

If the blacks who left California chose to stay instead, the California rate would actually be higher than it is right now, which as mentioned above is already higher than Alabama, Mississippi and Georgia. If blacks stopped going to the Deep South, the unemployment rate would lower. In other words, California is RIGHT NOW worse off for blacks in terms of unemployment relative to the Deep South, and in TRUTH would be WORSE if so many blacks didn't LEAVE.

There, data to corroborate common sense. [/QUOTE]

Poverty Rate by Race/Ethnicity

Black poverty state to state... Hint... California isnt first.

Ir whitening is apples and oranges when it comes to natives vs blacks. To imply all the mixed brazilins are whitened blacks is also utter bullshyt. You obviously dont know anything sbout argentina if you dont know about the mass italian immigration...

The thing is in Latin America whitening was an official government policy whereas it was never one in America. And the black population doubled after jim crow ended. Also the black population increased by a factor of 4 during the industrial revolution.

Facts are a tricky thing breh.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,