Newsom vs Deathsantis shadow debate; Thursday, Nov 30th

[Professor Emeritus]

Newsome already said he ain’t looking for nor will be the nominee for 2024. So stop with the clown rethoric..

You must believe those football coaches when they say they are 100% committed to the team they're on and aren't even thinking about that new job opening at Texas/Miami/Notre Dame.


If Biden needs to step down, Newsom will stop everything to try and be that guy.

 

[BigMoneyGrip]

You must believe those football coaches when they say they are 100% committed to the team they're on and aren't even thinking about that new job opening at Texas/Miami/Notre Dame.

You talking to the wrong dude breh…

 

[Reality Check]

the GOP '28 primary is interesting

desantis and haley will be the only ones left from this year. that fakkit ted cruz will be in there for sure. youngkin. rick scott wants it. rubio might get back to embarrassing himself

I think DeSantis is politically toast. There isn't enough image rehab in the world that could help him, not to mention he has two more years of being a lame duck Governor that got humiliated on the main stage. Also don't think Youngkin throws his hat in the ring; better odds that he tries to run for Governor of Virginia again in 2029. And Rubio is up for reelection in '28, and I'm guessing he focuses there as opposed to the Presidency.

The list I have for 28 is:

Nikki Haley
Tim Scott
Rick Scott
Ted Cruz
Brian Kemp (if he doesn't run for senate in '26 when his term is up or in '28 when Warnock is up for reelection)
Kristi Noem
Bryan Donalds
Josh Hawley
Vivek is young enough to probably try again

 

[Big Jo]

I think DeSantis is politically toast. There isn't enough image rehab in the world that could help him, not to mention he has two more years of being a lame duck Governor that got humiliated on the main stage. Also don't think Youngkin throws his hat in the ring; better odds that he tries to run for Governor of Virginia again in 2029. And Rubio is up for reelection in '28, and I'm guessing he focuses there as opposed to the Presidency.

The list I have for 28 is:

Nikki Haley
Tim Scott
Rick Scott
Ted Cruz
Brian Kemp (if he doesn't run for senate in '26 when his term is up or in '28 when Warnock is up for reelection)
Kristi Noem
Bryan Donalds
Josh Hawley
Vivek is young enough to probably try again

For '28 I see Haley, Hawley, Vivek, and frankly, one of Trump's kids

 

[the cac mamba]

For '28 I see Haley, Hawley, Vivek, and frankly, one of Trump's kids

the only one who would run is trump jr, but he's a tucker carlson type. a safe space p*ssy, who would never venture outside his little podcast to get challenged on anything

plus, if one of trump's kids runs in '28, the rest of the field might pool their money and have him killed

 

[Professor Emeritus]

@Rhakim



Like I said…the science minded among us dont have time for activists to figure out reality…

I told you at the time she was full of shyt and didn't know anything about the topic, and it keeps getting worse:

COP28: Relying on carbon capture and storage to reach Net Zero would be economically damaging, shows Oxford report

A high-CCS pathway to decarbonisation to potentially mitigate half of today’s emissions in oil and gas industry will cost an additional $30 trillion by 205012jav.net

www.downtoearth.org.in

Heavy dependence on Carbon Capture and Storage ‘highly economically damaging’, says Oxford report

Heavy dependence on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) to reach net zero targets around 2050 would be “hugely economically damaging”, costing at least $30 trillion more than a route based on renewable energy, energy efficiency and electrification.

www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk

• A high Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) pathway to net zero emissions in 2050 is expected to cost at least $30 trillion more than a low CCS pathway - roughly $1 trillion per year
  
• The cost of CCS implementation has not declined at all in 40 years, in contrast to renewable technologies like solar, wind, and batteries, which have fallen in cost dramatically
  
• Governments putting CCS at the centre of their national decarbonisation plans risk putting themselves at a competitive disadvantage

Heavy dependence on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) to reach net zero targets around 2050 would be “highly economically damaging”, costing at least $30 trillion more than a route based primarily on renewable energy, energy efficiency and electrification, a new report from Oxford University’s Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment has found.

Great "solution", cornball. This is what happens when you're so fukking focused on oil industry propaganda that you don't even want to see reality.



shyt on the ground is going nowhere. Has nothing to do with environmentalists blocking the way, it's just isn't working.

The World’s Leader in Carbon Capture Shows Why It’s a Long Shot - BNN Bloomberg

Fossil fuel producers at COP28 want to use technologies to cut emissions from dirty energy rather than target consumption. The US experience shows it’s not that simple.

www.bnnbloomberg.ca