Newsom vs Deathsantis shadow debate; Thursday, Nov 30th

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,686
Daps
203,902
Reppin
the ether



We're not a petrostate, does your dumbass not even know what a petrostate is? :dahell:

Petrostate​

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A petrostate or oil state is a country whose economy is heavily dependent on the extraction and export of oil or natural gas. The presence alone of large oil and gas industries does not define a petrostate: major oil producers that also have diversified economies are not classified as petrostates due to their ability to generate income from various industries and sectors beyond the oil industry.[1] Petrostates also have highly concentrated political and economic power, resting in the hands of an elite, as well as unaccountable political institutions which are susceptible to corruption.[2]

Countries considered to be petrostates[edit]​

Various countries have been identified as current or former petrostates:


Like I said, that isn't a list that inspires confidence in maintaining democratic integrity, environmental sustainability, or seeing gains trickle down to the poor. If they don't learn a lot from the Norweigian model as I suggested, then what are their chances?
 

Lexington Steele

All Star
Bushed
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
2,303
Reputation
845
Daps
9,863
Reppin
Porn
I was in the camp of previously thinking this debate was worthless for either but in retrospect, this was a real chess move for Newsom.

He's going to get the 2028 nod and with a little work and the right backing, he's ready.
Truly, they have found their white Obama. :wow:
 

Bleed The Freak

Superstar
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
11,884
Reputation
1,377
Daps
43,516
I was in the camp of previously thinking this debate was worthless for either but in retrospect, this was a real chess move for Newsom.

He's going to get the 2028 nod and with a little work and the right backing, he's ready.

If Newsom was governor of

- Colorado
- Minnesota
- Michigan
- Pennsylvania
- Arizona

He's a shoe-in. The big Cali ' Gordon Gekko' look is gonna kill him
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,200
Daps
620,150
Reppin
The Deep State
I was in the camp of previously thinking this debate was worthless for either but in retrospect, this was a real chess move for Newsom.

He's going to get the 2028 nod and with a little work and the right backing, he's ready.
he’s gotta work on that actual red state thing though…he can’t bullshyt everyone. He’d struggle in the midwest.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,200
Daps
620,150
Reppin
The Deep State
We're not a petrostate, does your dumbass not even know what a petrostate is? :dahell:

Petrostate​

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A petrostate or oil state is a country whose economy is heavily dependent on the extraction and export of oil or natural gas. The presence alone of large oil and gas industries does not define a petrostate: major oil producers that also have diversified economies are not classified as petrostates due to their ability to generate income from various industries and sectors beyond the oil industry.[1] Petrostates also have highly concentrated political and economic power, resting in the hands of an elite, as well as unaccountable political institutions which are susceptible to corruption.[2]

Countries considered to be petrostates[edit]​

Various countries have been identified as current or former petrostates:


Like I said, that isn't a list that inspires confidence in maintaining democratic integrity, environmental sustainability, or seeing gains trickle down to the poor. If they don't learn a lot from the Norweigian model as I suggested, then what are their chances?
Did I say we were a petrostate?
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
71,910
Reputation
17,079
Daps
306,088
Lowkey President Donald J. Trump should have called Desantis "Deathsantis". That would have went over harder than "Desantus" and "Desanctimonious". Boss lost a step :wow:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,686
Daps
203,902
Reppin
the ether
Lowkey President Donald J. Trump should have called Desantis "Deathsantis". That would have went over harder than "Desantus" and "Desanctimonious". Boss lost a step :wow:


I don't think Republicans actually care about that at all. It's just a nickname for liberals to use.

I have no idea why he runs with "Desanctimonious", that's got to be the most boring one I've seen and a large percentage of his audience probably doesn't even know the word.

"Meatball" is really his best one.
 

John Reena

Superstar
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
15,139
Reputation
-945
Daps
44,611
I was in the camp of previously thinking this debate was worthless for either but in retrospect, this was a real chess move for Newsom.

He's going to get the 2028 nod and with a little work and the right backing, he's ready.

I been saying from day one Newsome should be the nominee for 2028. Republicans are scared of him, even more now after he destroyed their next “chosen one”. Gavin should easily trounce them…..cuz who republicans gonna run in 2028 against Newsome? Christie?

:russ:

The “California” stuff not gonna hurt him. Republicans already tried that “He’s uppity, too celebrity, too liberal” crap with Obama and it didn’t work.
 
Top