New Birth Law

[88m3]

Sure. I've met some of the most wholesome girls, from the most wholesome families... I mean straight Cosby status, who are into choking and bondage. There is not a correlation between upbringing, and sexual preferences.

How do you think they picked up these sexual preferences?
Were they born with them?

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

And I've seen 16 year olds smarter than 45 year olds, so again your argument is stupid.

 

[NoMayo15]

How do you think they picked up these sexual preferences?
Were they born with them?

I don't know. Perhaps. And then maybe some guy put them on to it, and loved it. :shrug:


But it's not like they watched their parents have sex as children, and their moms were all into that type of rough play.


AND in addition to all this, I've had a girl confess to me that she was molested and was basically asexual ever since. So.... I don't think you can say whether or not a person will be hypersexual just because of a specific upbringing. OP has no advanced education, and is basically talking out of his ass.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

I don't know. Perhaps. And then maybe some guy put them on to it, and loved it. :shrug:


But it's not like they watched their parents have sex as children, and their moms were all into that type of rough play.


AND in addition to all this, I've had a girl confess to me that she was molested and was basically asexual ever since. So.... I don't think you can say whether or not a person will be hypersexual just because of a specific upbringing. OP has no advanced education, and is basically talking out of his ass.

It's about time for you to shut up.

Everything you learn in school can be learned through books. I guarantee I'm smarter than you at 18.

It's not the fact that they've seen there parents having sex, it's the fact that the girl could have possibly/maybe seen some type of physical abuse within the family, like an alcoholic father hitting the mother.

This eventually translates (somehow) into sexual behavior and preferences.

The abuse doesn't have to be physical either, the most common form of abuse is name calling/bullying/put downs and this happens a lot in broken families. This is when the kid learns that manipulation/bullying others is right/an accepted thing to do.

 

[NoMayo15]

Wow.

You lost so you resort to this childish bullshyt?

Uh... how did I "lose"?

You dismissed my arguments on the basis that it was my opinion, and when I pointed you were making a similarly structured argument somehow that makes me childish?

It's a fact that women tend to take care of children more often than the male for whatever reason, I just didn't care to waste time pulling up statistics for your dumb ass hypothetical.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

Uh... how did I "lose"?

You dismissed my arguments on the basis that it was my opinion, and when I pointed you were making a similarly structured argument somehow that makes me childish?

It's a fact that women tend to take care of children more often than the male for whatever reason, I just didn't care to waste time pulling up statistics for your dumb ass hypothetical.

I didn't dismiss shyt.

I countered every single one of your arguments until you gave up and said I didn't know anything, get real.

 

[NoMayo15]

I countered every single one of your arguments until you gave up and said I didn't know anything, get real.

Haha, no, you didn't. When I asked about enforcing this on males because they tend to be more irresponsible as parents than females, you simply argued that it was only my opinion. It wasn't until much later that you finally conceded that argument because you realized there is no good justification for subjugating women to this type of law more than men. When you tried justifying your stance on the basis that NDAA was much worse, I argued that it doesn't matter that one is worse than the other -- they're both wrong, and violate human rights. You came back with, well, everything is wrong but this is less wrong in my opinion.



That's not a rebuttal. You have not once demonstrated that this would actually improve what you claim it would. You haven't stood behind anything specific about it. I "gave up" because you're not talking about anything.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

Haha, no, you didn't. When I asked about enforcing this on males because they tend to be more irresponsible as parents than females, you simply argued that it was only my opinion. It wasn't until much later that you finally conceded that argument because you realized there is no good justification for subjugating women to this type of law more than men. When you tried justifying your stance on the basis that NDAA was much worse, I argued that it doesn't matter that one is worse than the other -- they're both wrong, and violate human rights. You came back with, well, everything is wrong but this is less wrong in my opinion.



That's not a rebuttal. You have not once demonstrated that this would actually improve what you claim it would. You haven't stood behind anything specific about it. I "gave up" because you're not talking about anything.

Lol dude, I'm done with you.

If you think I'm talking about nothing then you don't know how to read.

End of story peace.

 

[NoMayo15]

Lol dude, I'm done with you.

If you think I'm talking about nothing then you don't know how to read.

End of story peace.

So you're done?

And also, just out of curiosity, do you know what Jim Crow was?

I'll give you a minute.