New Birth Law

[spanishgirlsmmm]

There's no way Americans would go for this, are you insane??? You can't even convince most Coli posters this is a good idea. Women definitely won't go for it.

Here we go, I have an idea. How about we put your cock in a chastity belt for another ten years, and if we all agree you have enough money and are mentally stable enough, then we'll allow you to try to have sex with women.

Like, what dude is seriously going to agree with that?

Your comparison has no relation to mine.

Mine is logical, and is already basically implemented in some places, and it's obviously doing its job.

And your statement that, "Americans wouldn't go for it."



Come on dude, the majority of Americans are stupider than rocks, if we put my law on mainstream news like CNN and Fox and had talking heads speak good of it, the majority of Americans would accept it.

Americans already accepted NDAA and are pushing for gun control, get real.

 

[NoMayo15]

Your comparison has no relation to mine.

Mine is logical, and is already basically implemented in some places, and it's obviously doing its job.

And your statement that, "Americans wouldn't go for it."



Come on dude, the majority of Americans are stupider than rocks, if we put my law on mainstream news like CNN and Fox and had talking heads speak good of it, the majority of Americans would accept it.

Americans already accepted NDAA and are pushing for gun control, get real.

 

[Mowgli]

Because my way is actually logical, possible, and A LOT more realistic than your approach.

Sarcasm or not, your way is impossible.

Not really realistic, because the american people, will rebel and alot of people will have to die to submit to this law. A lot. Alot of solutions are logical. Like, this one.

Anyone who has a child before 25 gets shot in the head.

Thats pretty logical and will curb pregnancies drastically but not plausible because it will lead to rebellion. If you think American people are going to take forced sterilizations based on their income, you're insane.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

So you're done?

Also, just out of curiosity, do you know what NDAA is?

I'll give you a minute.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

Not really realistic, because the american people, will rebel and alot of people will have to die to submit to this law. A lot. Alot of solutions are logical. Like, this one.

Anyone who has a child before 25 gets shot in the head.

Thats pretty logical and will curb pregnancies drastically but not plausible because it will lead to rebellion. If you think American people are going to take forced sterilizations based on their income, you're insane.

I'm not insane lol.

You have to think outside of the box here.

Americans have ALREADY accepted worse laws than this.

And this one has countless benefits.

Do you understand that some parents are just NOT fit to raise children?

And the forced sterilizations wouldn't be based on anything, EVERY woman would be REQUIRED to get one on at a decided upon age.

 

[Dada]

Only a slave would want to live in a society that would even consider that. Then again, people who think like this always propose what should be done to someone else but don't consider what that same entity would do to them, with that power.

 

[Mowgli]

I'm not insane lol.

You have to think outside of the box here.

Americans have ALREADY accepted worse laws than this.

And this one has countless benefits.

Do you understand that some parents are just NOT fit to raise children?

And the forced sterilizations wouldn't be based on anything, EVERY woman would be REQUIRED to get one on at a decided upon age.

Yea i get it its just a wack idea because it essentially kills the work force of poor people America needs to function.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

Only a slave would want to live in a society that would even consider that. Then again, people who think like this always propose what should be done to someone else but don't consider what that same entity would do to them, with that power.

Don't you see how much it would improve society in the future?

Kids would all be raised by fit parents, and would all have a MUCH higher chance of getting an acceptable job and contributing to the economy, instead of doing illegal things to get money and thereby not paying taxes.

Come on.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

Yea i get it its just a wack idea because it essentially kills the work force of poor people America needs to function.

My law doesn't prevent stupidity or increase the ambitions of certain kids ;).

 

[Mowgli]

My law doesn't prevent stupidity or increase the ambitions of certain kids ;).

It sets a baseline income for children to be created and chances are the kids that work to feed the system are the kids you're preventing from coming into existence. Real short sighted thinking on your part that really fails to understand how this country makes money.

 

[NoMayo15]

So you're done?

Also, just out of curiosity, do you know what NDAA is?

I'll give you a minute.

Yes, I do. And it is nothing like telling women what they can and can't do with their reproductive organs. I also find it telling that you our right rejected a similar proposition when it's the male's body that's being compromised. Don't men tend to be the ones we see in not being responsible parents? Since we're talking about outrageous hypotheticals anyway, why wouldn't you support that?

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

It sets a baseline income for children to be created and chances are the kids that work to feed the system are the kids you're preventing from coming into existence. Real short sighted thinking on your part that really fails to understand how this country makes money.

The baseline income wouldn't be high at all though.

And I'm not "preventing" any kids from being born. Understand that I'm simply creating parents fit to raise children. Stupid and unmotivated and complacent adults would still exist without a doubt, and these would be the same people filling the low income jobs.

And my vote for the baseline income would be at least $30,000 per year.

With this income you could easily provide food and shelter for the child.

People that make below this amount usually don't have kids in the first place anyway or they are on welfare, but that's another issue lol.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

Yes, I do. And it is nothing like telling women what they can and can't do with their reproductive organs. I also find it telling that you our right rejected a similar proposition when it's the male's body that's being compromised. Don't men tend to be the ones we see in not being responsible parents? Since we're talking about outrageous hypotheticals anyway, why wouldn't you support that?

In my opinion, NDAA is a lot worse than my law. The potential it has is absolutely terrible and CNN is talking about Obama's fukking dog, .

The beauty of corporate owned media...

And the whole men being more irresponsible than women thing is just a statistic you pulled out of your ass based on your own life.

Women are the ones who are ultimately responsible for there decisions in whether to keep or abort there child.

 

[NoMayo15]

In my opinion, NDAA is a lot worse than my law. The potential it has is absolutely terrible and CNN is talking about Obama's fukking dog, .

The beauty of corporate owned media...

And the whole men being more irresponsible than women thing is just a statistic you pulled out of your ass based on your own life.

Women are the ones who are ultimately responsible for there decisions in whether to keep or abort there child.

We're not talking about abortion. We're talking about who's more responsible in providing for and caring for the child after birth. Seems to me there are a lot more deadbeat dads than moms; there's no need to pull up any figures on this, we all know this is true. Generally speaking, it's the men that leaves the woman and child to fend for themselves. Don't avoid the question. Why does it HAVE to be women that are subjugated to this, and not the men? You don't think there are going to be groups calling your bill sexist in nature?

As for NDAA, I agree with you there are some disturbing parts to it, but what you're proposing is so out there, very few people would agree to it. I agree there are bad parents, but the solution isn't to prevent half the population from reproducing for a decade, and only allow it if they make 30k. That's ridiculous.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

We're not talking about abortion. We're talking about who's more responsible in providing for and caring for the child after birth. Seems to me there are a lot more deadbeat dads than moms; there's no need to pull up any figures on this, we all know this is true. Generally speaking, it's the men that leaves the woman and child to fend for themselves. Don't avoid the question. Why does it HAVE to be women that are subjugated to this, and not the men? You don't think there are going to be groups calling your bill sexist in nature?

As for NDAA, I agree with you there are some disturbing parts to it, but what you're proposing is so out there, very few people would agree to it. I agree there are bad parents, but the solution isn't to prevent half the population from reproducing for a decade, and only allow it if they make 30k. That's ridiculous.

I'm glad you understand what NDAA could mean, most people couldn't give a fukk, it's sad.

And like I said, with the whole dad vs. mom argument, this is what it seems to YOU.

You're saying this because you're basing it on your own life, not on reality.

The truth is that, even if there are more deadbeat dads than moms, the mother is ultimately the one who decides whether or not to have the kid.

And obviously this law would have people against it, but the beauty of America is that everybody argues.