New Birth Law

[NoMayo15]

So you agree this idea violates a persons basic human rights, just like NDAA, but you're for one and against another because.... what... to YOU terrorism is less of a problem than irresponsible parents?

Well, you're just basing that on your own life, and not reality.

Using that logic, NDAA is completely valid as well as this harebrained idea.

The truth is that, even if there are more deadbeat dads than moms, the mother is ultimately the one who decides whether or not to have the kid.

What does deciding if she has the kid or not have to do with this? According to this logic, Male chastity belts will make sure that mostly responsible men are reproducing, and irresponsible men are not reproducing. This will most likely ensure the child will live in a two family home where the father is also mentally and financially stable to take care of his child. What is your objection to this?

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

So you agree this idea violates a persons basic human rights, just like NDAA, but you're for one and against another because.... what... to YOU terrorism is less of a problem than irresponsible parents?

Well, you're just basing that on your own life, and not reality.

Using that logic, NDAA is completely valid.



What does deciding if she has the kid or not have to do with this? According to this logic, Male chastity belts will make sure that mostly responsible men are reproducing, and irresponsible men are not reproducing. This will most likely ensure the child will live in a two family home where the father is also mentally and financially stable to take care of his child. What is your objection to this?

NDAA is a lot worse than my law, are you serious?

My law wouldn't imprison innocent people deemed as 'threats."

But forget that.

The whole male thing, well, I see your point.

But what about if the women decides to do an artificial insemination?

 

[NoMayo15]

NDAA is a lot worse than my law, are you serious?

My law wouldn't imprison innocent people deemed as 'threats."

But forget that.

The whole male thing, well, I see your point.

But what about if the women decides to do an artificial insemination?

I didn't say it was a lot worse. I said they both violate human rights. You're the only one making a judgement on which is worse than the other. I'm against both because they are both bad. Your law would imprison the reproductive rights of people. If you can not see any potential negative repercussions from the government dictating who's equip to have a child, then I don't know what to say.... well here's a thought: If you don't trust the government to use NDAA to arrest only terrorists, or bad guys who want to do harm to innocent civilians, why would you trust it to objectively say who is and is not fit for reproduction? I mean, how could one determine if someone would be a good parent? You've never heard or seen anyone who's a fukk up all their lives turn it around? You've never seen a great student/successful career person completely suck when it comes to their kids? There's so many possibilities ... again, how could the gov't objectively do this without fukking it up???

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

I didn't say it was a lot worse. I said they both violate human rights. You're the only one making a judgement on which is worse than the other. I'm against both because they are both bad. Your law would imprison the reproductive rights of people. If you can not see any potential negative repercussions from the government dictating who's equip to have a child, then I don't know what to say.... well here's a thought: If you don't trust the government to use NDAA to arrest only terrorists, or bad guys who want to do harm to innocent civilians, why would you trust it to objectively say who is and is not fit for reproduction? I mean, how could one determine if someone would be a good parent? You've never heard or seen anyone who's a fukk up all their lives turn it around? You've never seen a great student/successful career person completely suck when it comes to their kids? There's so many possibilities ... again, how could the gov't objectively do this without fukking it up???

There's negatives in everything b.

The positives far outweigh the negatives though.

And I already said what would determine a good parent, a financial and psychological evaluation.

Simply because you need an adequate amount of money to feed your kids and provide them the essential nutrients for there developing brains, especially in there child years when some unfit parents are shoving fast food down there kids throats.

And for the other simple fact that a kid picks up A LOT on there parents behaviors.

So if there parents are doing drugs to deal with there problems, or arguing all of the time instead of helping there child, then the kid picks up on this and accepts this as the standard of behavior and it's not right.

This is when you get girls who like being abused/tied down/etc becase they learned this from the abuse they saw in there own family.

My law would greatly reduce if not eliminate parents who are simply just NOT fit to raise a child whatsoever, sure one can argue that it is doing too much, but drastic times call for drastic measures.

 

[NoMayo15]

There's negatives in everything b.

The positives far outweigh the negatives though.

And I already said what would determine a good parent, a financial and psychological evaluation.

Simply because you need an adequate amount of money to feed your kids and provide them the essential nutrients for there developing brains, especially in there child years when some unfit parents are shoving fast food down there kids throats.

And for the other simple fact that a kid picks up A LOT on there parents behaviors.

So if there parents are doing drugs to deal with there problems, or arguing all of the time instead of helping there child, then the kid picks up on this and accepts this as the standard of behavior and it's not right.

This is when you get girls who like being abused/tied down/etc becase they learned this from the abuse they saw in there own family.

My law would greatly reduce if not eliminate parents who are simply just NOT fit to raise a child whatsoever, sure one can argue that it is doing too much, but drastic times call for drastic measures.

Again, all these "facts" are just opinions you're pulling out of your ass/not based in reality/etc. (esp. the bolded )

Your point is moot.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

Again, all these "facts" are just opinions you're pulling out of your ass/not based in reality/etc. (esp. the bolded )

Your point is moot.

Lmao dude, I know a lot about psychology.

What I'm saying is fact.

 

[88m3]

Again, all these "facts" are just opinions you're pulling out of your ass/not based in reality/etc. (esp. the bolded )

Your point is moot.

have you had much experience with girls who like to be tied down and abused?

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

have you had much experience with girls who like to be tied down and abused?

Not my thing I just read a lot.

 

[88m3]

Not my thing I just read a lot.

I believe you're right, it's a learned behavior. All Beckys don't like to be tied up and choked but some do... some do.

 

[Zombi_Jeezus]

I'd be lying if I said something similar to this has never crossed my mind.

 

[NoMayo15]

Lmao dude, I know a lot about psychology.

What I'm saying is fact.

No, you don't. You maybeee went to some no name community college. You don't know shyt about shyt.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

No, you don't. You maybeee went to some no name community college. You don't know shyt about shyt.

Haha, I'm 18 my dude.

I'm just smart.

Keep acting like you know my life.

 

[NoMayo15]

have you had much experience with girls who like to be tied down and abused?

Sure. I've met some of the most wholesome girls, from the most wholesome families... I mean straight Cosby status, who are into choking and bondage. There is not a correlation between upbringing, and sexual preferences.

 

[NoMayo15]

Haha, I'm 18 my dude.

I'm just smart.

Keep acting like you know my life.

Yeah, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. I could tell you were either really young, or went to a shyt school. Either way you don't know wtf you are talking about, and it was obvious in this thread.

 

[spanishgirlsmmm]

Yeah, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. I could tell you were either really young, or went to a shyt school. Either way you don't know wtf you are talking about, and it was obvious in this thread.

Wow.

You lost so you resort to this childish bullshyt?