All I said was 4K HDR>1080 discs and I still stand by it.
Now we may have to get truly into specifics as well cuz a lot of early blu-rays and even ones from 2011 era don't look that hot. Especially being so accustomed to watching tons of 4K (albeit mostly streamed) content. Now a lot of that is to the source etc but even with modern blus I stand by my opinion. Plus a lot of the catalog releases are being remastered for 4K but the included blu-ray is still the old one. Or titles like Silence of the lambs which are streaming 4k but no UHD disc. I know which version I'm watching.
If a new movie is not getting a 4k disc release but has a 4K HDR streaming option I'm gonna cop the streaming version.
You may think I'm pouring Jelly on myself and much of it is now due to space limitations but I'm cool with the choice. It's cheaper as well. Plus HDR >>
I notice most people who are vehemently anti-digital live in rural ass places and small towns. (I'm always on the blu-ray forum and there's a thread debating physical vs digital) Those of us in big cities don't have issues like
@ORDER_66 connection going to 480p.
There's plenty of website comparison and youtube videos on the subject and most of them lean 4K hdr over standard blu. 4K sdr is another story.
shyt there's even youtube vids of apple tv 4k streaming vs 4K disc calling it comparable so idk what to tell you.