Nearly half of new HIV infections are among young, black males

YouMadd?

Chakra Daddy
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,192
Reputation
1,590
Daps
69,856
Reppin
California
This is just me thinking out loud, but is there a possibility that Blacks also have a lower immunity to these types of diseases? Like say a black person has a better chance of catching the disease from an HIV+ person then a white person? :manny:

 

Thebadguy

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
71,444
Reputation
8,790
Daps
217,870
Reppin
NULL
This is just me thinking out loud, but is there a possibility that Blacks also have a lower immunity to these types of diseases? Like say a black person has a better chance of catching the disease from an HIV+ person then a white person? :manny:


They would rather assume that black people are more likely to be homos and deviants, even though its other races who are always getting caught having sex with other men and animals.
 

archer24

Ephesians 6:12
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
321
Reputation
120
Daps
876
Latinos and native Americans have rates which are higher than the national average.

Alaskans??????

Again I didn't make this up. It is the conclusion that health organizations such as the CDC have published

They have higher rates than the national average but that still doesnt explain why this is only an epidemic in the black community.

HIV/AIDS among American Indians and Alaska Natives | Factsheets | CDC HIV/AIDS

STATISTICS

HIV/AIDS in 2005

(The following bullets refer to the 33 states with long-term, confidential name-based HIV reporting. See the box, before the References section, for a list of the 33 states.)

HIV/AIDS was diagnosed for an estimated 195 American Indians and Alaska Natives (adults, adolescents, and children), representing 0.5% of the total number of HIV/AIDS diagnoses reported for that year [1].

The rate (per 100,000 persons) of HIV/AIDS diagnosis for American Indians and Alaska Natives was 10.4, compared with 71.3 for blacks, 27.8 for Hispanics, 8.8 for whites, and 7.4 for Asians and Pacific Islanders.

Women accounted for 29% of the HIV/AIDS diagnoses among American Indians and Alaska Natives [1].


STD Rates by Race or Ethnicity


In 2009, African Americans had 8.7 times the reported chlamydia rates of Whites.

In 2009, African Americans had 20.5 times the reported gonorrhea rates of Whites.

In 2009, African Americans had 9.1 times the reported syphilis rates of Whites.

In 2009, American Indians/Alaska Natives had 4.3 times the reported chlamydia rates of Whites.

In 2009, American Indians/Alaska Natives had 4.2 times the reported gonorrhea rates of Whites.

In 2009, American Indians/Alaska Natives had 1.1 times the reported syphilis rates of Whites.

In 2009, Hispanics had 2.8 times the reported chlamydia rates of Whites.

In 2009, Hispanics had 2.2 times the reported gonorrhea rates of Whites.

In 2009, Hispanics had 2.1 times the reported syphilis rates of Whites.
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
249,400
Reputation
30,853
Daps
762,756
Reppin
Top 4
Stop being promiscuous, homos and sharing needles.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk breh!
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,055
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,876
Reppin
Tha Land
They have higher rates than the national average but that still doesnt explain why this is only an epidemic in the black community.

HIV/AIDS among American Indians and Alaska Natives | Factsheets | CDC HIV/AIDS

STATISTICS

HIV/AIDS in 2005

(The following bullets refer to the 33 states with long-term, confidential name-based HIV reporting. See the box, before the References section, for a list of the 33 states.)

HIV/AIDS was diagnosed for an estimated 195 American Indians and Alaska Natives (adults, adolescents, and children), representing 0.5% of the total number of HIV/AIDS diagnoses reported for that year [1].

The rate (per 100,000 persons) of HIV/AIDS diagnosis for American Indians and Alaska Natives was 10.4, compared with 71.3 for blacks, 27.8 for Hispanics, 8.8 for whites, and 7.4 for Asians and Pacific Islanders.

Women accounted for 29% of the HIV/AIDS diagnoses among American Indians and Alaska Natives [1].


STD Rates by Race or Ethnicity


In 2009, African Americans had 8.7 times the reported chlamydia rates of Whites.

In 2009, African Americans had 20.5 times the reported gonorrhea rates of Whites.

In 2009, African Americans had 9.1 times the reported syphilis rates of Whites.

In 2009, American Indians/Alaska Natives had 4.3 times the reported chlamydia rates of Whites.

In 2009, American Indians/Alaska Natives had 4.2 times the reported gonorrhea rates of Whites.

In 2009, American Indians/Alaska Natives had 1.1 times the reported syphilis rates of Whites.

In 2009, Hispanics had 2.8 times the reported chlamydia rates of Whites.

In 2009, Hispanics had 2.2 times the reported gonorrhea rates of Whites.

In 2009, Hispanics had 2.1 times the reported syphilis rates of Whites.

I wouldn't call it an epedemic. That word is overused in my opinion. All time in america less than 200k black people have died of aids. Yeah it's bad but it's not an epidemic.

There are multiple reasons why black people's numbers are higher than others. First and foremost is poverty. Poverty raises the risk of contracting std's exponentially. Studies have shown if you only take poverty into account STD rates are equal amongst all races. Black people ate the most likely to be in poverty. Second is diversity Latinos and Asians come from all different walks of life and from all different parts of the world, with different cultures and practices. African Americans on the other hand mostly come from the same place, and are more than likely still living where they were born, this causes STD's to spread inside the closed local communities.
 

superunknown23

Superstar
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
7,872
Reputation
1,230
Daps
23,469
Reppin
NULL
fukk that shyt.
Education? All you need to know is you have to put on a condom... It ain't rocket science!
If you ain't strapping up, you deserve whatever STDs you get. :birdman:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,136
Daps
279,720
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
I wouldn't call it an epedemic. That word is overused in my opinion. All time in america less than 200k black people have died of aids. Yeah it's bad but it's not an epidemic.

There are multiple reasons why black people's numbers are higher than others. First and foremost is poverty. Poverty raises the risk of contracting std's exponentially. Studies have shown if you only take poverty into account STD rates are equal amongst all races. Black people ate the most likely to be in poverty. Second is diversity Latinos and Asians come from all different walks of life and from all different parts of the world, with different cultures and practices. African Americans on the other hand mostly come from the same place, and are more than likely still living where they were born, this causes STD's to spread inside the closed local communities.


Easy answer, nikkas are pressed for sex like no other race, why is that so difficult to admit?
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,127
Reputation
648
Daps
20,923
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
:childplease: :duck: I've been to ATL a few times. GA may be the peach state, but in ATL all I see is mangos.

Yet

Top Ten Reported AIDS Cases (Metropolitan Areas)
New York City: 126,237
Los Angeles: 43,448
San Francisco: 28,438
Miami: 25,357
Washington DC: 24,844
Chicago: 22,703
Philadelphia: 20,369
Houston: 19,898
Newark: 17,796
Atlanta: 17,157
AIDS Statistics - State and Metropolitan Statistics

Gays are supposedly the primary spreaders of AIDS.. but look at those numbers... ATL cant be the gay capital... the shyt don't add up

I live here and yes, there are gays, but I definitely...don't see anymore here than anywhere else ive been...
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,055
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,876
Reppin
Tha Land
Easy answer, nikkas are pressed for sex like no other race, why is that so difficult to admit?

Because it's not true.

From the CDC:
Today, AIDS continues to directly affect thousands of gay and bisexual men and injecting drug users every year, but it has also become a serious problem among Black Americans and, more recently, among the Hispanic/Latino population. However, it is not necessarily individual behaviour, but rather a person's sexual network which determines an individual's HIV risk in the USA. Therefore, black males are much more likely to be infected because of the high prevalence in this community and a tendency to choose racially similar partners as opposed to simply high-risk behaviour.

Black people aren't having any more or less sex than anyone else. It is all the other circumstances that cause the disparities.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
5,982
Daps
132,706
Yet

Top Ten Reported AIDS Cases (Metropolitan Areas)
New York City: 126,237
Los Angeles: 43,448
San Francisco: 28,438
Miami: 25,357
Washington DC: 24,844
Chicago: 22,703
Philadelphia: 20,369
Houston: 19,898
Newark: 17,796
Atlanta: 17,157
AIDS Statistics - State and Metropolitan Statistics

Gays are supposedly the primary spreaders of AIDS.. but look at those numbers... ATL cant be the gay capital... the shyt don't add up

I live here and yes, there are gays, but I definitely...don't see anymore here than anywhere else ive been...

Uh, everyone of those cities have way more people than ATL except Newark bruh. And ATL is still in the top 10 despite that.
 
Top