Nas - King's Disease II (Discussion Thread)

JustCKing

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
25,464
Reputation
3,946
Daps
48,373
Reppin
NULL
Naw homie sorry to break it to you:pachaha:
But you got another case of the Infamous Coli Booth nikkas Revisionist History:russ:

Let me go upside your head and knock some sense into you to unjogged your memory and for all those posters who dapped who share the same memory

Nas had intended his third album, I Am…The Autobiography, to be an ambitious, sprawling double disc — the first following him from birth to suicide, the second chronicling his return to Earth as a Jesus-like prophet.

This version of the album received rave reviews, including four-and-a-half mics from The Source, but about half of the album leaked online and Nas or Columbia Records (or both) decided to scrap the double album idea, remove numerous songs, record a few new ones, including the Puff Daddy-featured “Hate Me Now,” and release I Am… as a single disc that understandably sounds schizophrenic and contradictory.

Now are you sure what you posted is correct:russ:

And the bolded is filled with lies. The only truth is that I Am... was a planned double disc and the concept.

I have The Source review. They DID NOT review a double album. They reviewed the retail version as a double album never materialized. The double album never even leaked. Many of the leaked songs ended up on the retail, Nastradamus and Lost Tapes.
 

Waterproof

Warrior Lifestyle
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
12,684
Reputation
2,381
Daps
35,492
And the bolded is filled with lies. The only truth is that I Am... was a planned double disc and the concept.

I have The Source review. They DID NOT review a double album. They reviewed the retail version as a double album never materialized. The double album never even leaked. Many of the leaked songs ended up on the retail, Nastradamus and Lost Tapes.

:comeon:
Reading comprehension is a muthafukka, y'all can't Process a damn thing who in the fukk said the review for I Am the 2nd version was the double album review? Sure In the fukk wasn't me.

Now stay with me now, I don't want to lose you again. We going to take these steps nice and slow this is what I said (Got to walk grown ass nikkas through reading:mjlol:)

I said that The Source Received The Original I AM they had it months before anybody else, Columbia gave it to them

The Source took time to review listen to it and discuss it and they gave it 4.5 mics (Are You still me with, do I need to slow down?)

I AM was bootlegged! The Source had to go back listen to the album write another review that heavily criticize the album in which they didn't like what they heard on numerous songs.

But what they didn't change was The Mic Rating which was 4.5 mics which means superior in which the reviews didn't match. For whatever reason maybe they forgot, maybe they gave Nas once again the benefit of the doubt and ratings that he don't deserve and the Grace of Illmatic saved his ass again

I AM the 2nd version is not 4.5 mics it's not better than the original which received 4.5 mics, I Am the 2nd version is not better or equal to IWW the I Am 2nd version is 4 Mics at best, 4 mics It should of got. The mic rating's should of been changed because the review of the album doesn't match up with it being 4.5 mics which means Superior

That's what I said

Class is now over

Hold up did you said The OG I AM wasn't bootlegged, bruh you crazy, how about you post that scan because I believe they said the OG version was bootlegged, I believe I'm right.

Come on post it
 
Last edited:

JustCKing

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
25,464
Reputation
3,946
Daps
48,373
Reppin
NULL
fakkit responded



Unfortunately, he is right. I don't agree with his review, but all this being upset over a review to the point of posting pics of the reviewer and clashing with him on Twitter is extra. Before he reviewed King's Disease II, I doubt anyone was going out of their way to post pictures of him and slam a review that he wrote. He went from anonymity to people knowing who he was overnight because he gave Nas a 6.1 score.

Ya'll be giving power to people who otherwise have no influence.
 

Mastamimd

Ain't shyt
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
30,965
Reputation
9,963
Daps
129,852
Reppin
Houston
Unfortunately, he is right. I don't agree with his review, but all this being upset over a review to the point of posting pics of the reviewer and clashing with him on Twitter is extra. Before he reviewed King's Disease II, I doubt anyone was going out of their way to post pictures of him and slam a review that he wrote. He went from anonymity to people knowing who he was overnight because he gave Nas a 6.1 score.

Ya'll be giving power to people who otherwise have no influence.

He's still a fakkit :yeshrug:
 

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
62,045
Reputation
9,482
Daps
206,709
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
Naw homie sorry to break it to you:pachaha:
But you got another case of the Infamous Coli Booth nikkas Revisionist History:russ:

Let me go upside your head and knock some sense into you to unjogged your memory and for all those posters who dapped who share the same memory

Nas had intended his third album, I Am…The Autobiography, to be an ambitious, sprawling double disc — the first following him from birth to suicide, the second chronicling his return to Earth as a Jesus-like prophet.

This version of the album received rave reviews, including four-and-a-half mics from The Source, but about half of the album leaked online and Nas or Columbia Records (or both) decided to scrap the double album idea, remove numerous songs, record a few new ones, including the Puff Daddy-featured “Hate Me Now,” and release I Am… as a single disc that understandably sounds schizophrenic and contradictory.

Now are you sure what you posted is correct:russ:
The retail album received the 4.5 Mics. No other version.
 
Top