Monk is cool and if his shot actually is consistent, that's great...
But we need players with defensive tools. We need the Point Allowed to be significantly lower.
Nah, we need to bottom out.Just kicking around ideas here...I think the knicks will need a vet PG no matter who they draft and I'm looking at Patty Mills...a bit older than I'd like, but still hitting his prime (27) and I'd expect him to be a better value than cheaper vet PGs or the expensive top PG's in the class. If we're not chasing Teodosic and especially if we're adding Frank who could play both Guard spots, I wouldn't mind checking how much Mills is looking for...we could use a guy from the Spurs locker room in ours too.
Nah, we need to bottom out.
Use the cap space to take on bad contracts. I hope we're able to exploit Portland when they want to make a move.Patty Mills ain't making the difference between lottery and crappy pick fam. He's just a nice stop gap at hopefully a decent price so we can deal him when our understudy (aka Frank) is ready for the reins.
Frump, I feel you.No we need bpa
You have to look at who will be the best player down the road not who will help fill a need for the current team
Frump, I feel you.
With that being said, We need a future with defense being a part of our identity.
Good, I hope they sign him before we do
i think @DPresidential is saying he wants to draft someone who has the highest probability of being a two way star...We need stars/impact players first then you find role players to fit around them
I'm not drafting a glue guy/role player at 8. We need a lot more talent first
i think @DPresidential is saying he wants to draft someone who has the highest probability of being a two way star...
and you just want someone thats talented...
on paper frank is the guy you're looking for @DPresidential
I want the BPA.... idk what that will be however