Let's keep it very simple...
Phil did not become captain of this ship right before it hit the iceberg...
Phil became captain of the Titanic after it hit multiple icebergs in the last decade and the bottom cabins had already been flooding and the nose of the ship was already submerged.
We have had losing seasons, absolutely.
However, as
@I.V. used to argue, and I now admit I was on the wrong end of those arguments, it's about our future prospects.
And w/ Porzingis and Hernangomez, as well as the gambles of Kuzminskas, O ' Quinn and Lance Thomas - he has actually done a lot with few resources in establishing some stable future for this franchise.
I will still, as a fan, believe in playing hard to give fans a show, but the trading away J.R and Shump and other moves (Chandler/Felton) to low key sabotage the season and going from treadmill team to lottery team has actually worked in our favor.
Let me push the envelope...
An argument can actually be had that Phil's 2 years (possibly 3 this year) of making a strategically bottom feeding team has had more success in a considerably less time than the 76ers egregious "trust the process" lottery strategy.
I want us to succeed this year, but Phil is still trying to remove excess water from our sinking ship and if he gambled with a "could be a good team but most likely another lottery" strategy, I'm looking forward to the pick and above average prospect scouting in the next draft.
The biggest problem with Phil... his adherence to the Triangle. When you look at this Knick team...we actually could be formidable if they let these players play their game with Hornacek's schemes.
I mean if we were a primarily pick and roll team with guys like Rose, Jennings, Noah, Porzingis, and O 'Quinn... that's some potential. (I left Melo out of the PnR equation intentionally)
Thoughts?