My NYC Black Folk......Gentrification

Red Shield

Global Domination
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
21,333
Reputation
2,461
Daps
47,426
Reppin
.0001%
:mjcry: These cacs just wont stop. Why Jamaica tho. Its not close to the city anyway. And there is a high black home ownership in Jamaica Queens tho. :francis: Black people need to step they game up in the real estate game because there is alot of bread to be made. I swear all the nikkas in my circle aint even talking about investing in real estate or get assets SMH. Its frustrating. :snoop:

Why?


Because they want it all:skip:
 

Stir Fry

Dipped in Sauce
Supporter
Joined
Mar 1, 2015
Messages
30,858
Reputation
27,297
Daps
134,525
Gentrification, the musical? S.F. arts program explains kids' play featured on 'This American Life'
The idea was so odd it was featured in a recent episode of "This American Life," which focused on one father's befuddled reaction to seeing his kindergarten-age daughter perform songs about some serious adult issues that were the talk of San Francisco.

This American Life
Originally aired 12.18.2015
575: Poetry of Propaganda

Act Two. Not Our Town.
When Jon Mooallem went to see his six-year-old daughter in a musical at her after-school program, he didn't know what to expect. But it certainly was not the performance saw. The musical was created by Children's After School Arts. (15 minutes)
© 1995-2016 Ira Glass
The musical, "City Not For Sale," was put on by the nonprofit CASA (Children's After School Arts program). CASA executive director Leslie Einhorn said in an interview with SFGATE that despite concern from parents over the complex themes of the play, the ideas actually came from their fifth graders. The teachers worked with students through writing exercises and theater games to develop the musical throughout the year.



"Parents might think that the things they say aren't impacting their kids, or they might think that the changes in the city, that the kids aren't aware of it," Einhorn said. "But the truth is that they are: They were talking about it and they have a lot of questions and a lot of anxieties and they were watching their friends leave San Francisco and wondering what was happening and what they can do. So to be able to talk about it and to be able to make art about it, is very empowering for them."

Writer Jon Mooallem first wrote the article on "City Not For Sale" for Pop-Up Magazine and performed it at a live show, before it made its way to "This American Life." Mooallem juxtaposed the themes of the play with his own family's struggles of deciding whether to stay in San Francisco or not.

"So there they were, these blameless children, up there performing a kind of kiddie grotesque of the same exasperated conversation that all us parents were constantly having behind their backs," Mooallem narrated on "This American Life." "The conversation that more and more seemed to hang over every conversation in San Francisco, then inevitably spiraled into panicked Zillow searches for homes in Oakland, or Petaluma, or Portland."

"City Not For Sale" featured evil privacy-stealing tech execs, a song called the "Eviction Blues" and even hipsters. While the central plot of the musical might seem heavy for the kids to perform, CASA has a history of creating plays from a "social justice perspective," Einhorn said. Last year's theme was "San Francisco."

"CASA has this social justice mission," Einhorn said. "With every theme, we're looking at a social justice perspective. Looking at San Francisco at this time, we would be remiss to not address what's happening in the city in relationship to the influx of technology."

"We looked at San Francisco history and looked at all these different social movements in the city and talking about tech," Einhorn continued. "We were handling it very carefully, being aware that so many families have parents that are working in tech."

City Not For Sale Promo from CASA on Vimeo.

The seemingly anti-tech sentiment of the play was something that Einhorn ultimately had to address with parents, when a concerned father questioned the contents of the play after overhearing his daughter practice her lines. For Einhorn, the content of the play wasn't meant to be anti-tech, but the villain of the play was greed.

"The villains in this play were greed and what was representing greed was this guy who was in advertising and someone who was in technology," Einhorn said. "Yes, there are definitely a lot of those who live in San Francisco who feel like the city is less welcoming, there's a lot of residents vilifying new San Francisco, but the ultimate message is about everyone coming together."

"The kids got that, no problem," Einhorn added.

Since the episode of "This American Life" has aired in December, Einhorn said she's received a lot of positive reactions to the musical, and said that for the most part, "people really get it."

"Listening to this piece on 'This American Life' made me very proud to be part of this community of people who are brave enough to put these messages out there and to have these conversations that a lot of people shy away from or think that they're too complex for kids," Einhorn said. "In reality, it's the parents who have a hard time having these conversations — for the kids, it's a lot more simple."
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,439
Daps
246,377
No Longer Majority Black, Harlem Is in Transition


By SAM ROBERTS
JAN. 5, 2010

articleLarge.jpg

Joshua S. Bauchner, with his 2-year-old daughter, Evlalia, moved to Harlem in 2007. “In Manhattan, there are only so many directions you can go,” he said. CreditOzier Muhammad/The New York Times
Harlem has been synonymous with black urban America. Given its magnetic and growing appeal to younger black professionals and its historic residential enclaves and cultural institutions, the neighborhood’s reputation as the capital of black America seems unlikely to change soon.

But the neighborhood is in the midst of a profound and accelerating shift. In greater Harlem, which runs river to river, and from East 96th Street and West 106th Street to West 155th Street, blacks are no longer a majority of the population — a shift that actually occurred a decade ago, but was largely overlooked.

By 2008, their share had declined to 4 in 10 residents. Since 2000, central Harlem’s population has grown more than in any other decade since the 1940s, to 126,000 from 109,000, but its black population — about 77,000 in central Harlem and about twice that in greater Harlem — is smaller than at any time since the 1920s.
In 2008, 22 percent of the white households in Harlem had moved to their present homes within the previous year. By comparison, only 7 percent of the black households had.

popup.jpg

“I feel a community here that I don't feel in other parts of the city,” said Laura Murray, a student. CreditOzier Muhammad/The New York Times

“It was a combination of location and affordability,” said Laura Murray, a 31-year-old graduate student in medical anthropology at Columbia, who moved to Sugar Hill near City College about a year ago. “I feel a community here that I don’t feel in other parts of the city.”

Change has been even more pronounced in the narrow north-south corridor defined as central Harlem, which planners roughly define as north of 110th Street between Fifth and St. Nicholas Avenues.

There, blacks account for 6 in 10 residents, but those born in the United States make up barely half of all residents. Since 2000, the proportion of whites living there has more than doubled, to more than one in 10 residents — the highest since the 1940s. The Hispanic population, which was concentrated in East Harlem, is now at an all-time high in central Harlem, up 27 percent since 2000.

Harlem, said Michael Henry Adams, a historian of the neighborhood and a resident, “is poised again at a point of pivotal transition.”

Harlem is hardly the only ethnic neighborhood to have metamorphosed because of inroads by housing pioneers seeking bargains and more space — Little Italy, for instance, has been largely gobbled up by immigrants expanding the boundaries of Chinatown and by creeping gentrification from SoHo. But Harlem has evolved uniquely.

Because so much of the community was devastated by demolition for urban renewal, arson and abandonment beginning in the 1960s, many newcomers have not so much dislodged existing residents as succeeded them. In the 1970s alone, the black population of central Harlem declined by more than 30 percent.

“This place was vacated,” said Howard Dodson, director of Harlem’sSchomburg Center for Research in Black Culture. “Gentrification is about displacement.”

Meanwhile, the influx of non-Hispanic whites has escalated. The 1990 census counted only 672 whites in central Harlem. By 2000, there were 2,200. The latest count, in 2008, recorded nearly 13,800.

“There’s a lot of new housing to allow people to come into the area without displacing people there,” said Joshua S. Bauchner, who moved to a Harlem town house in 2007 and is the only white member of Community Board 10in central Harlem. “In Manhattan, there are only so many directions you can go. North to Harlem is one of the last options.”

In 1910, blacks constituted about 10 percent of central Harlem’s population. By 1930, the beginnings of the great migration from the South and the influx from downtown Manhattan neighborhoods where blacks were feeling less welcome transformed them into a 70 percent majority. Their share of the population (98 percent) and total numbers (233,000) peaked in 1950.

In 2008, according to the census, the 77,000 blacks in central Harlem amounted to 62 percent of the population.

The number of blacks living in greater Harlem hit a high of 341,000 in 1950, but their share of the population didn’t peak until 1970, when they made up 64 percent of the residents. In 2008, there were 153,000 blacks in greater Harlem, and they made up 41 percent of the population.

About 15 percent of Harlem’s black population is foreign-born, mostly from the Caribbean, with a growing number from Africa.

Some experts say the decline in the black population may be overstated because poorer people are typically undercounted by the census, and Harlem has a disproportionate number of poor people. Others warn that proposed development and higher property values may force poor people out, and they say that when the city was the neighborhood’s leading landlord it should have increased ownership opportunities for Harlem residents .

“Gentrification — the buying up and rehabilitation of land and buildings, whether by families or developers, occupied or abandoned — means a rising rent tide for all, leading inevitably to displacement next door, down the block, or two streets away,” said Neil Smith, director of the Center for Place, Culture and Politics at the City University of New York Graduate Center.

Mr. Dodson of the Schomburg Center moved from Riverside Drive to Newark not long ago. He said, “I tell people that I can’t afford to live in Harlem or in New York in the manner I deserve to.”
Other analysts point to the outflow of some blacks and the influx of others as positive evidence that barriers to integration have fallen in other neighborhoods and that Harlem has become a more attractive place to live.

“It’s a mistake to see this only as a story of racial change,” said Scott M. Stringer, the Manhattan borough president. “What’s interesting is that many African-Americans are living in Harlem by choice, not necessity.”

Andrew A. Beveridge, a sociologist at Queens College, said, “Harlem has become as it was in the early 1930s — a predominantly black neighborhood, but with other groups living there as well.”

Ronald Copney, a former limousine driver, and his two sisters share a brownstone on West 147th Street that his grandmother bought in 1929. He rents two floors to tenants, one of whom is white.

“This was always a very nice neighborhood,” he said. “In a way, it’s better now as far as property values are concerned.”

Geneva Bain, the district manager of Community Board 10, blamed the economy and the lack of jobs for the dwindling number of blacks.

She acknowledged, though, that white newcomers have sometimes been greeted ambivalently. “Integration is very subjective,” Ms. Bain said. “One person’s fellowship is another person’s antagonism. I am one who thinks that central Harlem has become a better place because of integration.”

Mr. Dodson, the Schomburg Center director, said one source of historic resentment remained: that blacks still accounted for a tiny minority of the area’s property owners.

“There are people who would like to maintain Harlem as a ‘black enclave,’ but the only way to do that is to own it,” Mr. Dodson said. “That having been said, you can’t have it both ways: You can’t on the one hand say you oppose being discriminated against by others who prevent you from living where you want to, and say out of the other side of your mouth that nobody but black people can live in Harlem.”

“The question of whether it’s a good thing or not,” he added. “I honestly can’t make that judgment yet.”

A version of this article appears in print on January 6, 2010, on page A16 of the New York edition with the headline: In Harlem, Blacks Are No Longer A Majority. Order Reprints| Today's Paper|Subscribe

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/nyregion/06harlem.html?_r=0
 

mson

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
53,803
Reputation
6,816
Daps
102,281
Reppin
NULL
I think that article was posted already. I see a lot of black people whenever I go to Harlem.
 
Top