Most jobs are low skilled. If you're not in STEM your job could likely be done by a teenager as long as they receive equivalent training. They need to remove a lot of these degree requirements for entry level office positions. You're getting trained from the ground up in these companies/agencies. From corporate/office culture, to processes to systems. What purpose does your degree serve? Proof that you owe a lot of money? Proof that you "accomplished something?" What tangible does that have in the workforce? We've all accomplished something. If that's the best reason an employer can provide for a degree requirement the position is low skilled. But instead of advocating for these artificial barriers to be removed people are saying, "Just go work at McDonald's." I understand that a lot of people who sunk time and money into school to obtain degrees do not want to see these requirements rolled back because hey, they did it, everyone else should too but if we're thinking logically here the train came off the rails a long time ago and this shyt is being used as a barrier and not a measure of merit, like credit checks for employment.
Thats actually a decent point, I dont think its a bad idea for jobs to reevaluate their requirements, to check for inefficiencies. I never said the opposite.
I was just pointing out that the kind of guy they were talking about in that article, is chosing unemployment over misery, frustration, or anything else he wouldve faced had he taken a low skilled job. By low skilled I mean no degree requirements, btw.
And thats fine, but its still a choice.
Degrees in America are overvalued, and lack substance a lot of the time. But either be apart the change, or a player in the game.