Take It In Blood
Banned
just cause some old religious racist cac said it happen doesn't mean it happenedHow could it be "ruined" by religious propaganda when there never even would have been a movie without the religious elements?
None of that movie would have even happened if that boy hadn't had really, really strong religious convictions.
GIbson actually downplayed a lot of the religious shyt from where it could have gone. In real life the love story was a girl he met at church, she didn't become a nurse until after the war. The stuff about Desmond having the 10 Commandments hanging on his wall and vowing "Thou shall not kill" from that was 100% true, and really a bigger part of his childhood than they even played it up to be in the movie. He really did enter the military as a conscientious objector, and really did have commanding officers who tried to kick him out on multiple occasions. And the war scenes could have had more religious overtones - Gibson completely left out that Doss absolutely believed he was being protected by God the whole time and believed that that's how he survived, or that he men began to believe he was literally untouchable. He had one time where he had the chance to kill a Japanese soldier in the middle of the war, and didn't, because of his convictions. Not to mention that Gibson kept out the story of the Japanese soldier who claimed afterwards that he tried to shoot the medic multiple times but his gun jammed.
And the scene where the soldiers risked their lives to go back and get Doss's Bible from the battlefield? That happened.
Sorry, but in real life this shyt was a really, really religious story.
Hacksaw Ridge vs the True Story of Desmond Doss, Medal of Honor
That last shot on the stretcher was corny as fukk though.
wouldn't surprise me if the entire movie is ducktales