Equivalent exchange...:trollol: that's what it seems like to me...
Also didn't Hitchcock start us off with slasher films with psycho?!
Masters of Horror Face off: Romero or Argento? Poll Open for limited time.
- Thread starter Neuromancer
- Start date
-
- Tags
- horror films
Equivalent exchange...:trollol: that's what it seems like to me...
Also didn't Hitchcock start us off with slasher films with psycho?!
Not everyone agrees on that one. Some say yes. Some say nah. So it depends on who you talk to and how they’re feeling at the moment.Equivalent exchange...:trollol: that's what it seems like to me...
Also didn't Hitchcock start us off with slasher films with psycho?!
Sore subject but carpenter and Craven. We don’t agree on who is better but I completely respect and understand why you pick CravenBiased much??Lol at you using "c00n or cac" in The Film Room as if it applies or makes sense. Who the fuk cares - it's a movie or film, unless he's sponsoring a remake of Birth of a Nation (1915) (and I'm not talking about the Nate Parker). Leave the type of shyt in TLR where it is more relevant. and ummmm speaking of which.
Correction: I've been in TLR since 2017 - I know how to recognize a c00n or a cac,since most of the ones that have been called out in there, no longer post or get exposed for their brand of coded lingo daily.
I comment and interacted with Marty enough in TFR (over a year) to know that he is always on point with his knowledge of the topics discussed and backs up his statements without all the unnecessary fluff or verbiage. He knows what he talks and doesn't just talk shyt like 80% of discussion board posters tend to do. We may not always agree, as with any type of discussion, but I have always respected his position and there's not many posters that I tend to have a respect in here for.
Gonna have to pass on this one. Not informed enough to give a good answer.
Thank you. exactly this. This is neither the space or place for it. No tolerance for all that, it's real extra and unnecessary.
Romero with a big lead. Maybe I should have done him vs Hopper?
Bigger movies. But then you’ll open the poltergeist can of worms
I'm trying to find a match up for Hopper tbh. But I got a few others before him.
You probably gotta get someone who you can objectively make the case where they have the same number of big films. That’s tough tho if you’re just looking at box office cause a lot of horror classics were ignored at the box office and became hits on vhs.
Flex Grossman
Funky
Voted Argento but Romero is admittedly a weak spot in my horror game
you know I luv yall dudes...(except for that one dude) it's all good and it's all for fun. Yall already know I have a strong opinion with what I talk about (that's just how I'm built) and I try to back up what I say rather than just talk the talk. We can all disagree respectfully and move on, even if we may not like what each other has to say - it's a film discussion. Like I said, it's all about mutual respect at the end of the day. Just because we have opinions or beliefs that counter, or don't always link - I will never disparage you for that. I don't take it like that. We always reach a type of understanding. I don't judge - as long as personal attacks or fronts don't come into play, which they don't in the topics that we discuss on here.
I may get my feelings hurt but I have no problems with everyone voicing their interests, likes or dislikes in here. I enjoy the commentary - dissenting or differing opinion as long as we keep it gully and respectful. Picked up a lot of gems off this. Even if @Daredevil adds musical scores to his polls or bias rankings and @Jello Biafra refuses to acknowledge or homage the defacto honorary master of horror, Rob Zombie.
@cac poster rarely likes any of the same movies that I do, (lol) but he never has a disrespectful tone or resorts to insults or names, I still respect what he has to say and his right to say it. Keeps it interesting. That's weak minded negative dumb shyt is not necessary- keep that in the bushes. We have a nice little horror crew built up here - differing opinions or not. 
you know I luv yall dudes... it's all good and it's all for fun. Yall already know I have a strong opinion with what I talk about (that's just how I'm built) and I try to back up what I say rather than just talk the talk. We can all disagree respectfully and move on, even if we may not like what each other has to say - it's a film discussion. Like I said, it's all about mutual respect at the end of the day. Just because we have opinions or beliefs that counter, or don't always link - I will never disparage you for that. I don't take it like that.
I may get my feelings hurt but I have no problems with everyone voicing their interests, likes or dislikes in here. I enjoy the commentary - dissenting or differing opinion as long as we keep it gully and respectful. Picked up a lot of gems off this. Even if @Daredevil adds musical scores to his polls or bias rankings and @Jello Biafra refuses to acknowledge or homage the defacto honorary master of horror, Rob Zombie.
Most definitely.
And you know you’re going to need to be prepared in the rob zombie thread
which of his flicks haven’t you seen? I still need to see Martin. I’m not a big fan of the crazies. And I do love creepshow. He’s also done some others I know I need to catch