Mass murders a white-male, not mental-health, issue

[kermit da hustla]

You can eat a dikk, bytch. Mass murders aren't a 'White-male' problem.

FOH.​

statistics say otherwise.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

statistics say otherwise.

They said exactly what I said you stupid motherfukker. GTFOH and troll someone else.​

 

[kermit da hustla]

They said exactly what I said you stupid motherfukker. GTFOH and troll someone else.​

er, no, sorry. you might want to get a primer on statistics and correlation, because what you said has absolutely _nothing_ to do with the preponderance of white mass murder as it relates to the white male population.

go back to school, kid. statistics refute your claim.

 

[Blackking]

Niccas do the same thing as white folks, and vice versa and ALL that is from being mentally unstable. It's street niccas, YOUNG niccas that have knocked down 3-4 dudes and still haven't been caught. And OG niccas that have knocked down 8 or so niccas that are still walkin the streets.

....

I don't know what you're experiences have been... but n1ggas usually kill nikkas that basically had it coming. For example I have a fam member who robbed some dealers.. he even kidnapped a person close to them. He left the state. If him and his associates are chillin and they get ak'ed.. then basically they asked for it.

Random shootings are rare with black people because we at least aim for our targets. You can count real black mass murderers in America on One hand... and you can only get to 5 if you include Nate Turner(justifiable).

IF White boys have and issue with a GF, mom, childhood, bullies, their dog or whatever and EVERY single person in their city HAS to die.

That's the basic difference.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

er, no, sorry. you might want to get a primer on statistics and correlation, because what you said has absolutely _nothing_ to do with the preponderance of white mass murder as it relates to the white male population.

go back to school, kid. statistics refute your claim.

You might wanna suck a dikk, bytch. The stats prove what I stated.

Welcome to the 'Ignore List'.

Have a Nice Day.​

 

[Blackking]

The issue is why are 'Black' mass murderers under reported. I think it may be an issue of racism.

I never thought I would read anything like this in my life.

 

[The Real]

75% leaves 25%. 'Black' people comprise about 14% of the general population and commit about 35% of reported mass murders, so the numbers aren't an issue. The issue is why are 'Black' mass murderers under reported. I think it may be an issue of racism.

Mass, multiple murder rates constant despite overall decline in homicides » The Commercial Appeal

​

That's an assumption that would be very difficult to justify. The vast majority of police resources are spent on Black neighborhoods, since most murders and happen within them. Black crime, if anything, is overreported, especially when you consider that we now have studies proving that most violent crimes in which the victim cannot identify their attacker tend to report Black, even when it is highly unlikely. To suggest that the Black mass murder rate should be even higher is taking the less likely route.

And, like I said before, when you take into account that population size is not a primary factor in homicides, there is really no reason to assume it can explain this disparity. Similarly, there is no reason to assume that, since Black homicide is not underreported (unless you are arguing that white homicides are underreported, since that disparity goes unquestioned in your explanation) that for some reason mass murder, which is magnified homocide, would be. These are the two main issues with your explanation.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

That's an assumption that would be very difficult to justify. The vast majority of police resources are spent on Black neighborhoods, since most murders and happen within them. Black crime, if anything, is overreported, especially when you consider that we now have studies proving that most violent crimes in which the victim cannot identify their attacker tend to report Black, even when it is highly unlikely. To suggest that the Black mass murder rate should be even higher is taking the less likely route.

And, like I said before, when you take into account that population size is not a primary factor in homicides, there is really no reason to assume it can explain this disparity. Similarly, there is no reason to assume that, since Black homicide is not underreported, that for some reason mass murder, which is magnified homocide, would be. These are the two main issues with your explanation.

Almost 40% of all mass killings in the US are perpetrated by 'Black' people, yet you'd have to do a Google search to name more than five of them. Meanwhile, naming 5 'White' mass killers is like recalling the days of the week. Ask yourself why.​

 

[Sunalmighty]

....

I don't know what you're experiences have been... but n1ggas usually kill nikkas that basically had it coming. For example I have a fam member who robbed some dealers.. he even kidnapped a person close to them. He left the state. If him and his associates are chillin and they get ak'ed.. then basically they asked for it.

Random shootings are rare with black people because we at least aim for our targets. You can count real black mass murderers in America on One hand... and you can only get to 5 if you include Nate Turner(justifiable).

IF White boys have and issue with a GF, mom, childhood, bullies, their dog or whatever and EVERY single person in their city HAS to die.
Random shootings are "rare" with black people?
That's the basic difference.

Random shootings are RARE? Do the research on how many mistaken identity killings take place in black communities, or a nicca missed his target. How about that 6 month old baby that got popped in Chicago some weeks back, or those THREE BABIES ages 5 and under that were murdered in Oakland over the last 18 months. What about that 15 year old black girl that was murdered in Chicago, weeks prior she had just sang at obamas inauguration? Or the 16 year old gang member in west oakland who couldnt find a rival gangmember to kill, so he just blew away a man walking to the store to get some cigs. Man, you can multiply the facts i just gave you over and over again. In 2005 there 8000 black homicides, 93 percent of them were black on black crime, I highly doubt a majority of them were intended targets. It's a ton, and I mean a ton of blacks In Their graves due to dumb azz niccas who can't shoot right. Or just don't care. In 1995, there were over 10,000 black homicides bro. I refuse to believe that most of those victims "had it coming"

 

[The Real]

Almost 40% of all mass killings in the US are perpetrated by 'Black' people, yet you'd have to do a Google search to name more than five of them. Meanwhile, naming 5 'White' mass killers is like recalling the days of the week. Ask yourself why.​

Seems like you're starting to move to a different point now.

First, I just want to reiterate what I said before. You didn't question the disproportionately Black composition of general homicide rates. So, assuming that you're not suggesting that white homicides are underreported, then we have no reason to assume that Black crime is underreported with respect to mass murders, which are merely magnified homicides, and logistically dealt with in the same way.

Now, to answer your question, first, let's lay out more groundwork. It's obvious to anyone that violent crime in general is portrayed as a Black thing, with regard to the media, and there is a long history of stereotyping in that regard that goes beyond the admittedly disproportionate racial makeup of crime. So, your argument is that there is media bias that specifically bucks said pattern with respect to mass murderers, and only them. I find that hard to believe, for obvious reasons, so you'll have to explain why this bias exists and what causes it.

I'm beginning to notice a general structural pattern in all of your arguments so far- you're suggesting that the bias is always against the white men in one, particular subcategory of crime, despite all evidence showing that the larger category is biased against Black people.

I personally think the answer is pretty simple- mass murder is defined at 4 bodies or up. Separate the higher from the lower numbers within the category, and you'll find that white men generally tend to occupy the higher range, while Black men do not. This is further established in the breakdown of categories like "school shootings," for example. Media attention is obviously more likely to be given to the bigger sprees. Furthermore, Black victims are not nearly as likely to show up in the media, for the same reason that Black crime is largely depicted as a universal or white threat, rather than as a phenomenon that also means that Blacks are the most likely victims. That's part of the generally biased approach to crime.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I never thought I would read anything like this in my life.

I'll be the first to admit it sounds insane, but there is a method to the madness. Serial Killers/Mass Murderers are always reported as these highly intelligent 'loners' or someone they'd never suspect since they 'blended in so well' due to their intelligence they were able to keep that side of themselves 'hidden' for decades (BTK, Green River Killer, Ted Bundy, etc).

This is a bold-faced lie, but that's what most people believe and why most don't believe 'Black' people can commit this type of crime. We're not 'smart' enough.

Meanwhile, the FBI Crime Stats tell an entirely different tale.
​

 

[BlvdBrawler]

The other reason is because it's only considered "mass murder" when the victims are white. Otherwise, it's just "a shooting that left 7 victims dead".

 

[Sunalmighty]

....

I don't know what you're experiences have been... but n1ggas usually kill nikkas that basically had it coming. For example I have a fam member who robbed some dealers.. he even kidnapped a person close to them. He left the state. If him and his associates are chillin and they get ak'ed.. then basically they asked for it.

Random shootings are rare with black people because we at least aim for our targets. You can count real black mass murderers in America on One hand... and you can only get to 5 if you include Nate Turner(justifiable).

IF White boys have and issue with a GF, mom, childhood, bullies, their dog or whatever and EVERY single person in their city HAS to die.

That's the basic difference.

List Of Black Serial Killers | Black Peoria. You said 5? Well, here is a link to 57 black mass murderers/serial killers in the states alone, and that is not even including niccas in the streets who have knocked down a ton of niccas and are still free.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

I remember reading something that broke it down.


If your a white male in middle america its really hard to have an identity. In order for a system of white supremacy to work you kind of have to fall in line. No individualism nothing. You get married, You have your two kids, you work your middle class job and you die. A lot of these white males go on killing sprees to make an identity for themselves and be remembered. Even if you go to jail you'll still get sympathy and you'll still have fans. If you want your name in the history books its way easier to just shoot a bunch of people than to actually make something of yourself.

 

[Sunalmighty]

I remember reading something that broke it down.


If your a white male in middle america its really hard to have an identity. In order for a system of white supremacy to work you kind of have to fall in line. No individualism nothing. You get married, You have your two kids, you work your middle class job and you die. A lot of these white males go on killing sprees to make an identity for themselves and be remembered. Even if you go to jail you'll still get sympathy and you'll still have fans. If you want your name in the history books its way easier to just shoot a bunch of people than to actually make something of yourself.

That sounds horrific. Like you are automated, come off an assembly line and that's it