Yeah, the scale should be changed. But why mess with the traditional system?nah, you're wrong. By your logic, there should be no 10 point or 100 point scale if no one uses anything below 7 or 7.5
Yeah, the scale should be changed. But why mess with the traditional system?nah, you're wrong. By your logic, there should be no 10 point or 100 point scale if no one uses anything below 7 or 7.5
if you admit the system is flawed, why not change it?Yeah, the scale should be changed. But why mess with the traditional system?
it's too apart of the traditional system. I adjust accordinglyif you admit the system is flawed, why not change it?
more like they should start actually using the full 10 point scaleYeah, the scale should be changed. But why mess with the traditional system?
nah, this sound like some cac shyt whites would say to uphold slavery. i know thats an overboard comparison but fukk youit's too apart of the traditional system. I adjust accordingly
more like they should start actually using the full 10 point scale
nah, this sound like some cac shyt whites would say to uphold slavery. i know thats an overboard comparison but fukk you
yes, it just seems like you don't want to actually read the reviews and just want to look at a rating.
I read reviews from the reviewers that have the same interests as me. With the barrage of good games out right now, the numerical score does right. shyt, in the last month I bought Neir, Noih, yakuza zero, horizon, mass effect (i love the series), and zelda. If I didn't have a cut off point, I'd be out a lot more money.yes, it just seems like you don't want to actually read the reviews and just want to look at a rating.
To be honest, I'd prefer if most of these publications remove their numerical score system. What's the point of having a full 10 point scale if you're only going to use 3 scores?
this thread has me dying. I dunno what to think. Reviews say it's ass, gut says it's ass, but i enjoyed dragon age inquisition . Reviews are killing this game but reviews shouldn't be taken as godpel My money fukked up right now but ive managed to buy 15+ games since October Horizon, Nioh and Nier still in shrinkwrap but my impulsiveness is saying get it now . Could just spend the money i was going to spend on it, on persona 5 instead, but backlog says i wouldnt touch persona 5 til decemberThis graph pisses me off. Everybody that is into video game reviews knows 85 is the cutoff. It's not a straight 1-10 scale. It only starts getting interesting when you hit 80 and above. an A = 90-100, B 80-90, C = 70-80, etc.
This isn't a proper 10 point system. It is what it is. 8 or 8.5 (in my case), equals good game. Just like when you get a B, it's a good grade. C, not so much (even though it's in the 70a).
The argument that 50 should equal average makes no sense. We grading on the traditional scale here (69 and below = D, 79-70 = C, 80-89 = B, 100- 90 = A, etc.). The last time I checked (I graduated a couple of years ago), an F (60 and below) does not equal a good score.
when i see the reviews of mas effect, i know this is how they'd look for a pro-black centered game.this thread has me dying. I dunno what to think. Reviews say it's ass, gut says it's ass, but i enjoyed dragon age inquisition . Reviews are killing this game but reviews shouldn't be taken as godpel My money fukked up right now but ive managed to buy 15+ games since October Horizon, Nioh and Nier still in shrinkwrap but my impulsiveness is saying get it now . Could just spend the money i was going to spend on it, on persona 5 instead, but backlog says i wouldnt touch persona 5 til december
anyone having strained relationships because of all of these games pouring out back to back to back?
So u copped and youre feelin it?when i see the reviews of mas effect, i know this is how they'd look for a pro-black centered game.
i am. there's a chance it could all change, but as it stands, it's an enjoyable game.So u copped and youre feelin it?