This is the only thing that matters.
Agreed. Everyone in America should stop talking about the riots and start talking about what caused them. But there are reasons why they don't want it that way.
This is the only thing that matters.
Exactly the whiteman owns the air u breathe can take your crib through immenent domain & can take your car through that act that Obama passed over a year ago. Yall simple nikkas drunk off that babylon juice.
@Ego Noir what I meant earlier is this; the church is still stuck in turn the other cheek mode. They seem to forget that the civil rights era pastors were tooled up themselves and preached self defense. Even Jesus went in on the money changers in the temple. The political "leaders" are too busy being politically correct. They want to tip toe around the issues to salvage relationships they may need down the line for their own selfish interests. The radical element wants revolution but won't take that anger and frustration beyond a few block of their own neighborhoods. They may not own it, but they are the only ones truly affected by the destruction because they live in that area and patronize those businesses for better or worse. Every element of the movement is docile and complacent in it's own right, unable to, but more so unwilling to, move beyond a certain comfort level. Combine that with the fact that these three elements never seem to be on the same page or working together also hinders any progress.
How so?There's a fine line between valid criticism and c00ning......and you crossed that line.
What caused them? Do you know or do you just assume?Agreed. Everyone in America should stop talking about the riots and start talking about what caused them. But there are reasons why they don't want it that way.
There's a fine line between valid criticism and c00ning......and you crossed that line.
What caused them?
actually it was their tea, america was not independent, those men still viewed themselves as british, this is one of the events which lead those british men (now americans) to break away from their country.That wasn't their tea though. It belonged to the East India Tea Company, a crown corporation. They took over the ships, destroyed the tea and burned a few ships over a silly tea tax. They took it directly to the source. They didn't go and fukk up a local shop. If CVS was in control of the police force by all means destroy which ever one is in your path. But since they don't but you want to destroy a business anyway, go fukk up one downtown where it won't affect your community. Let some white people be inconvenienced and have to clean up some shyt for once. I don't get why you all are okay with none of these displays of destruction never making it out of the predominantly black areas. It's almost as if you're offended that people wonder why no one is getting at these fukking cacs or government/police institutions.
Colonists objected to the Tea Act because they believed that it violated their rights as Englishmen to "No taxation without representation,"
I suppose they should of turned the other cheek and apologized and prayed for his soul? Like good docile subservient negros that wants a butter biscuit and chitlins.self incriminate yourself brehs.
Is that fact or an assumption?Police brutality.
That is a great photo.
Somebody post that photo of that breh with the flaming cop car behind him.
I would blow that photo up and have it framed in my living room if I was breh.
Is that fact or an assumption?
actually it was their tea, america was not independent, those men still viewed themselves as british, this is one of the events which lead those british men (now americans) to break away from their country.
thats the tea they were supposed to sell/consume, and the tea tax goes back to england. east india tea company, was also a private company, and not controlled by the british monarchy, it was just a bunch of wealthy aristocrats, but the rebellion forced the british govt to respond. so yea that was actually a great analogy.