Not following the logic here, at all.
The knocks you have against the first 2 eps are mostly....because, well,
it's the first two eps. Why would everything (the plot, who the villain is, etc.) all be in the first 2 eps? How is "what was going on was barely established" a complaint when discussing
the first two episodes?
The major difference between eps 1-2 vs 3 is
potential. No we didn't know everything, but we didn't have to. It's the first 2 eps. We know more now....and the writing is shaky as hell.
As far as Zemo, he hates the Avengers because they killed his family in "AOU". There's an entire movie based on that. So him suddenly hating super soldiers
more than the Avengers....is frankly retarded. Especially when he was using a super soldier (Bucky)
to get revenge on the Avengers in the first place.
Matter of fact, you can disregard all that and just focus on this. Bucky and Falcon have zero reason to trust him. Let alone the optics of the successor of Captain America running around with a terrorist that bombed the god damned U.N., and killed King T'Chaka. Hell, never mind the optics of him being black while doing all this.
shyt is ridiculous.
Fred.