Marvel ain't touching DC in the next few years.

[MartyMcFly]

Yes I see that breh but he and @IllustratorMike and myself are quoting the director here. Straight from her mouth. She was on an episode of how did this get made and talked about the entire process. Marvel had their opinions and thoughts but lionsgate ran the show since they were paying the money and anytime she had a question or concern or idea she went to lionsgate

 

[gluvnast]

I could have swore the Joker got captured and two-Face got killed. Compared to the Batman they lost.

It didn't mattered that the Joker was captured, his "ace in the hole" was transforming Harvey Dent. Even Gordon at the END stated outright, "the Joker won". They had to create a LIE to the public so the public would not know the truth of what really happened, and Batman because an outcast villain. There was NOTHING happy about that ending.

 

[MartyMcFly]

It didn't mattered that the Joker was captured, his "ace in the hole" was transforming Harvey Dent. Even Gordon at the END stated outright, "the Joker won". They had to create a LIE to the public so the public would not know the truth of what really happened, and Batman because an outcast villain. There was NOTHING happy about that ending.

Basically. I watched it last week for the first time in a while and that ending is still dope but a downer. The joker won lol. And he won big time. He turned batman and dent into villains and turned batman and Gordon into liars

 

[Bryan Danielson]

In February 2004, two months prior to The Punisher‍ 's theatrical debut, Lions Gate Entertainment announced the studio's intent to produce a sequel. Avi Arad, chairman and CEO of Marvel Studios, expressed his interest in developing the franchise, saying that the second film would "become the fifth Marvel property to become a sequel.


In March 2005, Marvel Studios announced a 2006 theatrical release date for The Punisher 2.[8] In April, Lions Gate Entertainment's CEO, Jon Feltheimer, confirmed at LGF's 2005 fiscal third quarter analyst call that the studio had completed its deal to develop The Punisher 2.[9] Prior to July, Arad revealed that the script was being rewritten and that the sequel would start filming within the year.

In August, Marvel Entertainment revealed a new film slate that included The Punisher 2 on its partial list with production still to be determined.[14] Thomas Jane said that the writer was halfway through a draft and that he believed filming would begin by February 2007.

 

[MartyMcFly]

Lol what's the face for breh? You going to believe Wikipedia or the words from the directors mouth? Which is it? Listen to the punisher war zone episode of how did this get made

 

[Bryan Danielson]

Actually that was Lionsgate that made/distributed Punisher: War Zone with little to no input from Marvel.
Now I've gotta admit that I love the hell outta this flick but dark it was not.

Most of the action in this was cheesy over the top fun in an 80s movie vibe.

Ok.... maybe I need a refresher of what is considered DARK.

Cuz I know some claim Joker off screen killing like 2 people and that one magic trip death scene which in more "implied" than actually shown is considered "dark" but Frank Castle cutting off heads isnt and is over the top?

What are some "dark" moments in the Batman .... oh.... I'm sorry.... DC movies?

 

[MartyMcFly]

Ok.... maybe I need a refresher of what is considered DARK.

Cuz I know some claim Joker off screen killing like 2 people and that one magic trip death scene which in more "implied" than actually shown is considered "dark" but Frank Castle cutting off heads isnt and is over the top?

What are some "dark" moments in the Batman .... oh.... I'm sorry.... DC movies?

Dark is about a tone and subject matter and how it's played. Punished warzone is played for laughs; it's obvious as hell its not supposed to be taken seriously. While the dark knight deals with death much more seriously. When judges are blown up, commissioners are poisoned, and people are shot point blank range with a shotgun, it's not played for laughs or with a wink at the audience. I'm not saying one has more merit over the other just answering your question breh

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

I explained this to you before. Avi Arad is a co-founder of Marvel Studios and he was the CEO of Marvel Entertainment. He and Marvel Entertainment were producers on Fantastic Four, Daredevil, The Punisher, the Spider-Man films with Tobey, all that shyt from the early 2000s.

They and Stan Lee had some input in the properties but ultimately it is the studio that has the final say. Marvel Studios didn't produce their own film until Iron Man and that's when they had full creative input. We have no idea how much input they had on the earlier films unless there is an interview that explains what role they took on..

So all this bullshyt you keep posting... it's for naught.

 

[Bryan Danielson]

Lol what's the face for breh? You going to believe Wikipedia or the words from the directors mouth? Which is it? Listen to the punisher war zone episode of how did this get made

Marvel Knights is also the name given to a production arm of Marvel Studios intended to be used to produce some of Marvel's darker and lesser known titles.

I thought this was common knowledge tho

Just like in the comic.... I have a couple of Marvel Knight comics... Welcome Back Frank for one..... that is pretty much like how that movie was.... violence wise... I thought Warzone stayed TRUE to the comics

 

[MartyMcFly]

Marvel Knights is also the name given to a production arm of Marvel Studios intended to be used to produce some of Marvel's darker and lesser known titles.

I thought this was common knowledge tho

Just like in the comic.... I have a couple of Marvel Knight comics... Welcome Back Frank for one..... that is pretty much like how that movie was.... violence wise... I thought Warzone stayed TRUE to the comics

Yes breh I hear you but if the damn director said they had no input and that it was all lionsgate and that it was a marvel movie in name only, what are we really arguing here? You want to tell her she was wrong and that her experience didn't happen? You going to incept her?

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

This dude doesn't understand the concept of multiple producers and one distributing studio. A film can have multiple producers but it is the studio that distributes the movie that canmake changes to the final product and ultimately has the final say.

Marvel Studios films are distributed through Disney. They are the lone distributor with Spider-Man being the exception. Sony and Disney will co-distribute Spider-Man movies but I believe Sony has agreed to allow Disney creative control. I will have to read further on that.

 

[MartyMcFly]

This dude doesn't understand the concept of multiple producers and one distributing studio. A film can have multiple producers but it is the studio that distributes the movie that canmake changes to the final product and ultimately has the final say.

Marvel Studios films are distributed through Disney. They are the lone distributor with Spider-Man being the exception. Sony and Disney will co-distribute Spider-Man movies but I believe Sony has agreed to allow Disney creative control. I will have to read further on that.

Nah you're right. Sony is going to fund it but marvel gets creative control. Normally whomever pays the money has the final word though

 

[AnonymityX1000]

It didn't mattered that the Joker was captured, his "ace in the hole" was transforming Harvey Dent. Even Gordon at the END stated outright, "the Joker won". They had to create a LIE to the public so the public would not know the truth of what really happened, and Batman because an outcast villain. There was NOTHING happy about that ending.

Life is about PR and not actual circumstances now? I would rather be a rich billionaire whose alter ego is a fake fugitive nobody likes than locked up. But hey that's just me. lol

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

Nah you're right. Sony is going to fund it but marvel gets creative control. Normally whomever pays the money has the final word though

I think I read that Sony will take home more than 50% of the profits but I can't remember now. It's a win-win for both though.

 

[MartyMcFly]

I think I read that Sony will take home more than 50% of the profits but I can't remember now. It's a win-win for both though.

Basically. Well I read they get all of the profits from the solo movies but none from when he's in other marvel movies which is fair