Mark Sanchez is the starting qb on sunday

[theGoldmangod]

Sanchez is fukking horrible. Can't see how Jets fans deal with it

 

[mvp_status]

Sanchez is fukking horrible. Can't see how Jets fans deal with it

 

[N.Y. State of Mind]

 

[obarth]

McElroy didn't turn the ball over. Is that not marked improvement?




But he's not.

You're a good poster so I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you have a secret scouting report on McElroy that says he doesn't turn the ball over. Because that would make more sense than a seemingly rational individual taking seven pass attempts and assuming they can conclude a QB doesn't turn the ball over. Or assuming with that small a sample size you can say a QB is a marked improvement over another. Yeah, I'm going to assume that.

And, you say Sanchez isn't the better of a bad group of QBs, so who is better, and give me reasons for them being better.

Also, I won't bother on replying to the coli's resident Skip Bayless.

 

[JLova]

This is not surprising. They're tied to him now with that contract they gave him in the offseason. Tebow sucks and is hurt and McEllroy...I'm not sure why they don't give him a shot.. Maybe he doesn't have the playbook down? Who knows?

Jets fans....this is going to get worse because Sanchez will be here next year too.

Yall had Drew Stanton as a backup and then stupidly got Tebow. If Stanton was on the squad he'd be starting. If Clemmens was still on the squad he'd be starting. Jets situation reminds me of the 9ers with Smith back in the day. They surrounded him with shyt QB's and either avoided getting better QB's or traded away any QB that posed a threat to his job. I been there.

 

[tremonthustler1]

You're a good poster so I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you have a secret scouting report on McElroy that says he doesn't turn the ball over. Because that would make more sense than a seemingly rational individual taking seven pass attempts and assuming they can conclude a QB doesn't turn the ball over. Or assuming with that small a sample size you can say a QB is a marked improvement over another. Yeah, I'm going to assume that.

And, you say Sanchez isn't the better of a bad group of QBs, so who is better, and give me reasons for them being better.

Also, I won't bother on replying to the coli's resident Skip Bayless.

It's a matter of the known entity vs. the unknown entity. In regards to Tebow and McElroy, it's not about what they can do. Nobody thinks they're the future anything for this franchise. Nobody knows what McElroy can do for this team. On the other hand, we have 4 years to go on with Mark. We know what he's done this season and it's not good. For all we know, McElroy could be worse and he very well might be. Jets fans are willing to take their chances simply because the known entity (Mark) has been awful and if he plays to what he has shown, he will continue to be that. Nobody wants McElroy because he's gonna be a beast. They want him because he'd really have to apply himself to be as bad as Mark's been.

 

[infamous212]

The worst part is sanchez is sayin shyt like he's glad he got benched it opened up his eyes and is gonna make him work harder... REALLY? none of that otehr dumbass shyt u did made u wanna try a little harder?

 

[obarth]

It's a matter of the known entity vs. the unknown entity. In regards to Tebow and McElroy, it's not about what they can do. Nobody thinks they're the future anything for this franchise. Nobody knows what McElroy can do for this team. On the other hand, we have 4 years to go on with Mark. We know what he's done this season and it's not good. For all we know, McElroy could be worse and he very well might be. Jets fans are willing to take their chances simply because the known entity (Mark) has been awful and if he plays to what he has shown, he will continue to be that. Nobody wants McElroy because he's gonna be a beast. They want him because he'd really have to apply himself to be as bad as Mark's been.

Trust me, I understand that any fanbase wants the unknown commodity over the commodity that's known to be trash. My whole point this whole thread has been, stop with the faux outrage about Sanchez not being benched. I'd be outraged if the Jets don't draft a legitimate possibility for the future of the QB position this upcoming draft. They should have done it this past draft. They're not going anywhere this year. So it doesn't really matter who starts.

I also don't think McElroy would have to apply himself to be as bad as Mark if they ask the same of him as they ask of Mark. If they put a vanilla offense out there for McElroy then he'll have to apply himself to be as bad, but if they ask him to throw as much as Sanchez does with these same "weapons", the same protection from his o-line, and the same running game that Sanchez usually gets I don't think a third stringer will have to apply himself to be bad. That's the thing, no team wants their third stringer playing. If a third stringer is getting significant playing time it signifies injuries to your other QBs or complete ineptitude from your other QBs. They're third stringers for a reason.

So from a fans POV I completely get it, but from the coaches viewpoint it makes sense why he'd go back to the starter he's had the last 3+ years. He leaves himself the option to bench Sanchez again, if need be, and go to the 3rd stringer as opposed to vice versa.

 

[Hammer]

Rex Ryan Won't Get Another Head Coaching Job After This Year

 

[tremonthustler1]

Trust me, I understand that any fanbase wants the unknown commodity over the commodity that's known to be trash. My whole point this whole thread has been, stop with the faux outrage about Sanchez not being benched. I'd be outraged if the Jets don't draft a legitimate possibility for the future of the QB position this upcoming draft. They should have done it this past draft. They're not going anywhere this year. So it doesn't really matter who starts.

I also don't think McElroy would have to apply himself to be as bad as Mark if they ask the same of him as they ask of Mark. If they put a vanilla offense out there for McElroy then he'll have to apply himself to be as bad, but if they ask him to throw as much as Sanchez does with these same "weapons", the same protection from his o-line, and the same running game that Sanchez usually gets I don't think a third stringer will have to apply himself to be bad. That's the thing, no team wants their third stringer playing. If a third stringer is getting significant playing time it signifies injuries to your other QBs or complete ineptitude from your other QBs. They're third stringers for a reason.

So from a fans POV I completely get it, but from the coaches viewpoint it makes sense why he'd go back to the starter he's had the last 3+ years. He leaves himself the option to bench Sanchez again, if need be, and go to the 3rd stringer as opposed to vice versa.

They won't do it and quite frankly I hope they don't, because what I don't want is for the next QB to come in and inherit a mess. This year they should work towards fixing whatever else they need (RB, OLBs, a safety, a TE, depth everywhere, G). The QB's just aren't there to be had and there won't be a way to get rid of Fez.

 

[captaincharisma]

Trust me, I understand that any fanbase wants the unknown commodity over the commodity that's known to be trash. My whole point this whole thread has been, stop with the faux outrage about Sanchez not being benched. I'd be outraged if the Jets don't draft a legitimate possibility for the future of the QB position this upcoming draft. They should have done it this past draft. They're not going anywhere this year. So it doesn't really matter who starts.

I also don't think McElroy would have to apply himself to be as bad as Mark if they ask the same of him as they ask of Mark. If they put a vanilla offense out there for McElroy then he'll have to apply himself to be as bad, but if they ask him to throw as much as Sanchez does with these same "weapons", the same protection from his o-line, and the same running game that Sanchez usually gets I don't think a third stringer will have to apply himself to be bad. That's the thing, no team wants their third stringer playing. If a third stringer is getting significant playing time it signifies injuries to your other QBs or complete ineptitude from your other QBs. They're third stringers for a reason.

So from a fans POV I completely get it, but from the coaches viewpoint it makes sense why he'd go back to the starter he's had the last 3+ years. He leaves himself the option to bench Sanchez again, if need be, and go to the 3rd stringer as opposed to vice versa.

they shouldn't be asking that of mcelroy though, the rex jets are all about taking care of the ball on offense, no one is even asking sanchez to be some dynamic quarterback and lead a high powered offense. yet he continues to make mistakes in the red zone and kill any chances of this team winning. in is 4th year, and repeats the same mistakes over and over.

that in of itself should warrant looking at someone else regardless of how talented you think they are, it's unacceptable. you think a coach like parcells would've given sanchez all these chances? and what kind of message does it sell to your team when everyone's job is safe no matter how bad you're playing?

 

[McTwerk]

I'm immune to these stupid decisions at this point. I expect a lot of this from Mark this Sunday

The bad decision was not hitting that checkdown where there was nothing but green pastures ahead....

I think they need to blow this shiz up!
Get rid of Tanny, Rex, Sanchez and Tebow. Build around McElroy.

I am a long time Jets fan, but this team isn't built for a Ship run and is in an undeniable rebuilding era....

 

[tremonthustler1]

New York Jets' biggest problem continues to be Mark Sanchez - NFL.com