Of course I've been in the threads....I basically start all of the boxing related threads
Secondly, if he responds to your valid point with "yall dont know anything about boxing besides Floyd", prove him wrong.....because honestly, he's right about most posters.
All yall know and try and breakdown/have opinions on is Floyd it seems. "Yall dont know anything about boxing besides Floyd" is a valid point/statement/criticism as well until yall prove otherwise.
Ima keep it real, especially being that Im the one who creates probably 80-85% of the boxing threads in here, alot of yall be ghost unless it has something to do with Floyd (and that includes Manny because the Floyd/Manny beef).
If he calls yall out on it, prove him wrong and come in here and post about something else with the same passion that yall post about Floyd.
Break down why Kell Brook beat Shawn Porter or even why Matthysse vs Molina was more difficult than it should've been...exhibit your boxing knowledge outside of Floyd, and then people would see you as more than just a Floyd stan.
My brehs @InvictusAeternusEternus and @icebergonfire have done it multiple times, so even though they mainly post about Floyd....they've proven they know their shyt
Hell, I was thought to be just a Broner stan when I first touched down and got accepted by The Ring family within no time:blesed:
I've debated with him before. You know how the coli is.. You could he dead wrong and nikkas won't admit it.. Both ppl walk off feeling the exact same way they did before the debate. So instead of wasting my energy I choose to make snide remarks, ruffle feathers, talk some shyt and keep it moving. My saying "bu bu but he's a boxing expert" is just as valid as him saying you don't know anything about boxing besides Floyd. Because if that were tru then that would mean he knows it all when it comes to boxing right?
unless he's being hypocritical
