Bu bu but you have no arguments to anything I say only when someone else can do it ...just know your role and keep Floyd's dikk in your mouth like a pacifierBu bu but hes the boxing expert on thecoli
Bu bu but you have no arguments to anything I say only when someone else can do it ...just know your role and keep Floyd's dikk in your mouth like a pacifierBu bu but hes the boxing expert on thecoli
Bu bu but you have no arguments to anything I say only when someone else can do it ...just know your role and keep Floyd's dikk in your mouth like a pacifier
Who Said Anything About scoring? He's trying to hurt the guy breh lol..i don't think maidana is concerned about scoring points on floyd
Who Said Anything About scoring? He's trying to hurt the guy breh lol..i don't think maidana is concerned about scoring points on floyd
how can you be a boxer in a sport where the winner is decided on scoring...and not be concerned with scoring points
he lost to floyd in points
as i said..this is pro boxing...not amateur boxing...boxers can win fights by Ko's, TKo's, technical decisions, decisions, and disqualifications..maidana has 31 Ko's in 35 wins...is that a record of someone who is concerned about scoring points?...he has punching power..he's not paulie malignaggi
as far as your roughhousing comment is concerned..look no farther than shawn porter..that roughhousing bullied a better boxer than out of a title and sent another notable boxer into the bushes..porter cant box a damn either
That's certainly true but a lot of his landed shots were not scoring blows, so when you score a round you cant give him points for landed punches nor "effective" aggression because for it to be effective it has to actually either land or lead to something, at the very least it should have discouraged Floyd from countering which never happened. Now I give credit to Marcos because he actually tried to press the action which is something almost nobody tries for any significant amount of time against Floyd so I appreciate what he was trying to do but objectively you cant just give a guy rounds just because. Its kinda the same thing that happened in Manny vs Bradley 1 just that Manny was a bit more effective, so I scored it a closer fight that Maidana vs Mayweather but ultimately its why I gave Bradley the fight.
OK then at some point Chino go a have to realize he's fighting Floyd. And not Adrien broner.
All that trying to knock Floyd out shyt is just gonna cost him another decision
i wouldnt say it didnt discourage floyd because floyd was sleepwalking a bit early in the fight...when dude was in the ropes he was more concerned about the physicality and not getting hit by that weird overhand right maidana has than by countering which is effective aggression and why the fight was damn near even until the 7th
Bu bu but hes the boxing expert on thecoli
Why do people say this?
Yall nikkas be having self-insecurity issues with @patscorpio
and floyd has to realize he's fighting marcos maidana.....contrary to what ppl think..maidana is not an easy fighter to defeat and that was not an easy fight for floyd....3 out of the 4 fighters that beat him went through hell to do it (one of those fights a possible robbery)..that one that didn't whipped him easy and it wasn't floyd mayweather lol
Why do people say this?
Yall nikkas be having self-insecurity issues with @patscorpio
Because that's how he portrays himself. Anytime someone makes a valid point he says shyt like "you don't know anything about boxing besides Floyd.."
So my response is obviously gonna be ok enlighten me since your the boxing expert. That's called SARCASIM. then dude will say some silly shyt that don't even make sense so of course I'm gonna be like "bu bu but he's the expert"...
It's actually odd that you would even ask me why we say this. Have you not been on these threads?
@TheNig