Man Shot in the Head by Cop 58 seconds After Being Pulled Over for Tinted Windows

[ExodusNirvana]

the officer didn't instruct him to do any of those things you would do so it's a moot point. reasonable people can assess and reassess if there's a threat in an ongoing situation and at no point did the driver make a verbal or physical threatening gesture. he instinctively acted defensively like anyone would when a weapon is pointed right at their abdomen in close proximity.

FYI: wanting safer transportation options doesn't mean I hate cars.

The officer pulled him over. FACT.

The breh exited the vehicle for no reason. FACT.

These two things happened before ANY of the other shyt.

At no point did the officer offer ANY instructions, nor should he have had to, because it most reasonable drivers known that when you are pulled over by law enforcement you pull over and await instructions. This is BASICS for any driver.

And finally, wanting safer transportation is an admirable cause but as I've pointed out to you, your position is no different than when right wingers claim that want border protection, which is code word for we want LESS FOREIGNERS.

Many people do want border protection because drugs and guns go back and forth across the border at alarming rates, just like many people want safer streets.

HOWEVER....safer transportation is code word for "Get rid of cars" in the same way that border control is code word for less foreigners.

Even if YOUR intentions are actually safer transportation (it's not, we've peeped your pattern of posting) the intentions of people who want "safer streets" is to get rid of cars.

 

[bnew]

The officer pulled him over. FACT.

The breh exited the vehicle for no reason. FACT.

These two things happened before ANY of the other shyt.

At no point did the officer offer ANY instructions, nor should he have had to, because it most reasonable drivers known that when you are pulled over by law enforcement you pull over and await instructions. This is BASICS for any driver.

And finally, wanting safer transportation is an admirable cause but as I've pointed out to you, your position is no different than when right wingers claim that want border protection, which is code word for we want LESS FOREIGNERS.

Many people do want border protection because drugs and guns go back and forth across the border at alarming rates, just like many people want safer streets.

HOWEVER....safer transportation is code word for "Get rid of cars" in the same way that border control is code word for less foreigners.

Even if YOUR intentions are actually safer transportation (it's not, we've peeped your pattern of posting) the intentions of people who want "safer streets" is to get rid of cars.

such as disingenuous comparison.

people were accusing leftwing activists of the same thing in the Netherlands when they protested for safer modes of transportation and they still have cars there 40+ years later.

stop fearmongering and support the initiative that'll lead to less traffic for you to drive through.

 

[Laidbackman]

Explain to me why dude stepped out of the truck when pulled over?

I live in NYC and I wouldn't do that shyt, let alone the Deep South

The stop was definitely some bullshyt, but why step out of the car and make a move towards...where exactly?

This occurs at the 3:22 mark

The man was never pulled over. He apparently just got home, and began to exit his vehicle at the same time the cop pulled up. That's what I see at the 3:22 mark. That's why he never asked the cop why he was being pulled over, but instead kept asking him what the issue was. That's why the cop couldn't say anything back that made sense. In this situation, this cop needed to tell him instantly what the issue was, but he failed. Right now, I see no probable cause. This isn't the situation where a cop pulled somebody over, and they got out the car prematurely. If that was the case, the cop would have had his gun already drawn. I see why this brother felt agitated. He was probably in front of his own house, or already at his destination, and the cop got mad because he didn't get a chance to pull him over. This cop needs to go down for manslaughter.

 

[ExodusNirvana]

such as disingenuous comparison.

people were accusing leftwing activists of the same thing in the Netherlands when they protested for safer modes of transportation and they still have cars there 40+ years later.

stop fearmongering and support the initiative that'll lead to less traffic for you to drive through.

Netherlands....bikes...blah blah...

Sad.

JUST like right wing Republicans....wave your right hand so the people can't see what you're doing with the left hand

Oh oh....LESS TRAFFIC....don't mention you're trying to charge motherfukkers damn near $25 to drive into Manhattan

The only thing worse than a MAGAt in NYC is a "Progressive". And I stand by that.

 

[ExodusNirvana]

The man was never pulled over. He apparently just got home, and began to exit his vehicle at the same time the cop pulled up. That's what I see at the 3:22 mark. That's why he never asked the cop why he was being pulled over, but instead kept asking him what the issue was. That's why the cop couldn't say anything back that made sense. In this situation, this cop needed to tell him instantly what the issue was, but he failed. Right now, I see no probable cause. This isn't the situation where a cop pulled somebody over, and they got out the car prematurely. If that was the case, the cop would have had his gun already drawn. I see why this brother felt agitated. He was probably in front of his own house, or already at his destination, and the cop got mad because he didn't get a chance to pull him over.. This cop needs to go down for manslaughter.

This I did NOT see so I will definitely fall back on that point.

If indeed this was not an actual traffic stop then my previous points are null

 

[DEAD7]

justified unfortunately.

 

[bnew]

justified unfortunately.

the police aren't even claiming that

 

[ExodusNirvana]

justified unfortunately.

Again, from what I'm seeing in the article, he was "pulled over" which is why I made my prior statements

There is no justification for violating someone's civil rights. Lemme get that out the way right now.

If the man wasn't actually pulled over, then no it wasn't justified, and essentially what the cop did was run up on a Black man exiting his whip.

However, if it truly was a traffic stop, sirens and all, then my prior points stands, that you can't just do what you want because you don't like cops or don't trust them or don't believe they had a right to pull you over. It does'nt work like that, nor should it.

 

[Laidbackman]

justified unfortunately.

I don't see this cop being able to prove the man tried to elude him, which would have gave him the right to arrest him. He even asked the cop what the issue was, but all the cop could say was he wasn't following directions. Plus, once the key is out of the ignition, or the motor is turned off, it's to late to issue a traffic citation, since he never officially pulled him over. It's too late to even issue a DWI at that point.

 

[ExodusNirvana]

I don't see this cop being able to prove the man tried to elude him, which would have gave him the right to arrest him. He even asked the cop what the issue was, but all the cop could say was he wasn't following directions. Plus, once the key is out of the ignition, or the motor is turned off, it's to late to issue a traffic citation. It's too late to even issue a DWI at that point.

Is this true? This seems very reckless

 

[Consigliere]

Grabbing an officers weapon or taser is a death sentence. Too many of these stories involve people making that poor choice.

With that said, a routine traffic stop should never turn into a violent confrontation. Take his plates. Send him a ticket or summons in the mail and everybody can go home without costing the tax payers millions.

 

[Consigliere]

The man was never pulled over. He apparently just got home, and began to exit his vehicle at the same time the cop pulled up. That's what I see at the 3:22 mark.

This is 100% speculation and doesn’t appear anywhere in that video.

 

[bnew]

Attorneys: Videos show Derrick Kittling's death at hands of Rapides deputy unwarranted

Derrick Kittling family attorneys issued a joint statement about the video released by the Louisiana State Police.

news.yahoo.com

archive.ph

"We believe that Deputy Rodney Anderson profiled Derrick from the moment he initiated this out-of-jurisdiction traffic stop for window tint and a modified exhaust," the attorneys say in a statement issued by Crump's law firm. “Deputy Anderson escalated and demonstrated the use of unnecessary deadly force during this traffic stop."

so the cop was wasn't even designated to work where he was.

I bet that "window tint and a modified exhaust" excuse was conjured up after the fact.

 

[Noriega]

Grabbing an officers weapon or taser is a death sentence. Too many of these stories involve people making that poor choice.

With that said, a routine traffic stop should never turn into a violent confrontation. Take his plates. Send him a ticket or summons in the mail and everybody can go home without costing the tax payers millions.

Making any type of physical move at an officer is a death sentence.

Take your lil citation, license suspension whatever and go home alive

Coli militants will ignore this

 

[DEAD7]

The discussion about how we arrived there is fine but once you begin wrestling with an officer and grabbing for sh*t.
Its usually a wrap.


I implore all my brothas to follow instructions when pulled over.
Don't become a hashtag on principle.