Man of Steel (2013)

Bryan Danielson

Jmare007 x Bryan Danielson x JLova = King Ghidorah
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
103,422
Reputation
9,628
Daps
201,673
Reppin
#We Are The Flash #DOOMSET #LukeCageSet #NEWLWO
What does that have to do with what I said, none of that changes the fact that The Amazing Spiderman is the lowest grossing Spiderman film to date, even with 3-D ticket sales, none of that changes the fact Spiderman 1-3 adjusted for inflation plus 3-D sales =$1B+ and Iron Man 3 numbers for all three films.

On Man of Steel, breh you dont give an established superhero, a film with a massive budget after the previous installment flopped hard, a massive marketing campaign, a Summer release, attach one of the "hottest" and"well known" director's in the game today who is essentially a "brand" and known for The Dark Knight, Batman trilogy and Inception, directed two superhero films that grossed over $1B, plaster his name all over it as if it's his film, despite him only being responsible for the story :heh: and expect the film to only make around $650M at the box office, in an age where superhero movies are now blockbusters and making buck, you dont!, they were looking at $800M-$1B+. :childplease: Before the movie was released analysts were talking about how it would become WB's highest grossing film ever and gross over $1B, the execs were definitely expecting more money to be made and are not confident on a sequel, this is corroborated by WB inserting Batman "the proven cash cow and bigger draw" into the next movie that features Superman and making it a dual led film as opposed to a full on solo sequel. WB wanted a new franchise that would be their "blockbuster cash cow", Harry Potter and Nolan's Batman had finished, Hobbit films would be done in 2014, Superman was supposed to take over and be it but it couldn't even hold the top spot for a week or crack $300M domestic :dead:


Whoooooaaaaa calm down breh! An age where Super Hero movies are make $800- $1 Billion??? Like on average??

Breh, let's not get too geeked TDK franchise or SOME of the 100% Marvel movies. Nor act like and forget the other exist.

A HANDFUL made big bank like that. I don't understand how $650M can be looked down on or disrespected?
 

FromStLouis

Superstar
Joined
Oct 31, 2017
Messages
8,130
Reputation
1,544
Daps
22,622
Reppin
St. Louis, U.S.A.
Brandon Routh should still be Superman

53023eb9fe284c298d816c83513b42a4--brandon-routh-superman.jpg
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,884
Brandon Routh should still be Superman

53023eb9fe284c298d816c83513b42a4--brandon-routh-superman.jpg
Why?:why: probably a nice guy but his superman looked gayish and embraced all the negative cliches ppl detest about the character. Its probably because of this trash that dc/wb and snyder went completely the other direction and lost the character all together
 

FromStLouis

Superstar
Joined
Oct 31, 2017
Messages
8,130
Reputation
1,544
Daps
22,622
Reppin
St. Louis, U.S.A.
Was he the one that played the "stalker" Superman?

I never heard him referred to as that.

Why?:why: probably a nice guy but his superman looked gayish and embraced all the negative cliches ppl detest about the character. Its probably because of this trash that dc/wb and snyder went completely the other direction and lost the character all together

He never got his fair shot at the role. The blame goes up top to DC/WB. With the right story, (a true reboot) he had all the tools to shine in the role, even with how bad 'Returns' is, it's there.

In no way was he to blame for Returns. You can't find a critic's review from 2006 that says that.

He should still be Supes, that's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.

He's the better Superman, not that brooding bullshyt that was Man of Steel and the DCU would be in a much better position than it is today.

Despite all this, DC can still right their wrong and give him the 'S' back.
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,884
I never heard him referred to as that.



He never got his fair shot at the role. The blame goes up top to DC/WB. With the right story, (a true reboot) he had all the tools to shine in the role, even with how bad 'Returns' is, it's there.

In no way was he to blame for Returns. You can't find a critic's review from 2006 that says that.

He should still be Supes, that's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.

He's the better Superman, not that brooding bullshyt that was Man of Steel and the DCU would be in a much better position than it is today.

Despite all this, DC can still right their wrong and give him the 'S' back.
Looking at that still he looks like something out of syfy. They even gave him blue contacts and everything, fugazi superman:mjlol:
 

Benefited

Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
10,786
Reputation
91
Daps
30,216
I never heard him referred to as that.



He never got his fair shot at the role. The blame goes up top to DC/WB. With the right story, (a true reboot) he had all the tools to shine in the role, even with how bad 'Returns' is, it's there.

In no way was he to blame for Returns. You can't find a critic's review from 2006 that says that.

He should still be Supes, that's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.

He's the better Superman, not that brooding bullshyt that was Man of Steel and the DCU would be in a much better position than it is today.

Despite all this, DC can still right their wrong and give him the 'S' back.

Ridiculous:mjlol:

But then again he can't do worst than Cavill:francis:
 
Top