No, you do need to prove it. That's what burden of proof is, you buffoon. The very existence of these people at conventions is also proof of my argument that this is a circus and not normal. The burden of proof is on you to show otherwise.
Notice how I haven't told you your opinion is wrong? Because it's an opinion. You can believe there's nothing wrong with fishes speaking at a convention. I'll disagree but I won't tell you you're wrong; I don't care. If you try to frame your opinion as fact, I will challenge you to prove it, though. As I have numerous times.
Grow up, you child. You don't find anything wrong with children speaking at a so-called existential election convention because they speak on your level.