Lupe Fiasco Goes On Twitter Rant Against "Uppity Black Ni--as,"

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
43,994
Reputation
2,191
Daps
128,947


He has voiced his opinion on numerous occasions. If you posted in here more then you would realize that this isn't the first time he's said some stupid shyt. I thought you were coming in here defending everything he has said in the past when I first posted. You don't even realize his train of inconsistencies. Nevermind, :snoop: go google up.

I know what he has been saying it's just misguided i dont agree with all of it, hell i barely agree with any of it that's his views not mines :yeshrug:. I'm happy hes speaking out on what he believes in we need more entertainers like that. Another thing, he talks about his issues with our country on his album.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-150
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL

I voted Democrate because the alternative was an extension of several Bush policies that I disagree with and John McCain was attempting to endager this country and the world by putting a dangerously unbalanced and uneducated hick 1 heart beat away from the Presidency



So... Romney is going to win because he has more money? I guess they dont even count votes anymore right?



This is a blanket statement that couldnt possibly apply to 100% of elected officials at all levels of government. I've never been a fan of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Its the job of the citizens to hold their elected representatives accountable.


What are these 6 rights that have been wiped out and how will NOT voting restore them or protect the remaining rights?


I'm not advocating revolution. I vote. I encourage others to vote instead of monday morning quarterback and arm revolt.

6.Moving to another country changes what? U.S. has involved itself politically, socially and economically on almost every country in the world.

Maybe you should just kill yourself if you can neither contribute to the system or find the strength of charachter to fight against it.


1. Sadly you voted for the Bush Policies under Obama who has extended them. You didn't do your research on O and you didn't want a racist white man in office again. Proved my first point.

2. Your vote didn't count b/c those who invest in the election make multi million deals before and after the election. Supreme Court Descion to allow unlimited amount of campaign funds for elections is what has been passed since 2010. And since Corporations are considered people....they can vote.
You also don't do your research on that. Proves my 2nd point.

3. What world do you live on? Money is power here. Any person willing to push their agenda on a candidate with the backing of money will seek that position. Rahm Manuel did it in Chicago...why not. Now when does any of these people get in trouble or prosecuted? There is no responsibility, no accountability b/c your rights are pretty much gone and vanishing quick.



4. Freedom of Assembly...you seen that during the Occupy Protestors.

Freedom of Press...who controls the airwaves in news and media. Even local Media is suppressed into doing the same stories as mainstream.

Freedom of Religion continues to attacked under Obama with Muslims in America being threaten and harassed everyday.

Search and Seizures were ruined under Bush but has increased and continued under Obama.

5th and 6th Amend Is no more...Bush enforced it but Obama has increased locking people up without due process and no jury and no trial.


8th Amend doesn't apply anymore since innocent men and mentality handicap people are being penalized by death in the prison system. Prison System is a whole other monster.

6. Exposing the system is how you fight it...but you are voting so you are going with it cause you don't do your research nor vote for people that benefit your life.
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
79,913
Reputation
14,208
Daps
190,244
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits

Why do people always back down to the elderly? They vote in droves and they're active (right or wrong in their beliefs). Look at who the people are at those town hall meetings. Elect your candidates and then hold them to the fire. The problem is people settling for mediocrity in the first place and assuming the status quo is the best that they can get.

People who do vote and who abstain both have that same perception.
:clap: exactly, I say this all the time, the elderly vote is one of major areas politicians target. Why? because they know they'll vote rain or shine, they don't have anything else to do :beli:

How do you know his views on why voting is useless , all he did was tweet a few 140 character tweets im sure he has more justifiable reasons.

He goes irrational tangents about :obama: being a terrorist and telling people not vote semi-monthly. It's kind of annoying by now.
lupe has the right to voice his views, especially considering ALL of them are legit concerns any African American should be upset about. 5,000 People have been shot dead in Chicago since 2001;

But hey just vote because it’s the lesser of two evils who gives a fukk about how either side effects us. Let’s just vote blindly as usual, stupid non uppity nikkas
What the f*ck does this have to do with anything. You mentioned 2001, guess who was president in 2001. Guess how we got into this economic crisis. If Lupe is such a political activist, how come if wasn't saying sh*t about bush / cheney during their reign of terror, at minimum when he came on the scene in 06. He sounds like he comes off like he learned politics overnight or by watching some pseudo intellectual youtube video. :comeon: Two back to back wars, while cutting taxes.

The U.S. budget went from being 9+ trillion in the surplus, to 13 trillion in the hole. No mention of that. I think most people lack the complexity to fully understand how delicate foreign policy. See an earlier post of mine.....
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
5,982
Daps
132,705
One of the reasons why it seems like nothing is done in the black community is because democrats know they have the black vote wrapped up regardless. Are you guys comfortable with that?

Look at the Jews, yeah, they traditionally vote democratic, but one of the reasons they are still catered to is because they are seen as fickle voters that could change their minds on some spur of the moment type shyt. Even Latino's get a certain amount of respect. Not so with black folk...and the problem is compounded now that we have a black President. If the threat of black folks staying home on election day were real, they would receive a lot more attention from these candidates....instead the only time Obama addresses the black community is when he dishes out "hard truths," and scolds them....and people soak that shyt up :laff: shyt is comical. But y'all support that, apparently.

Real talk, in the 4 years that Obama has been President, have things really improved all that much from Bush? I'm talking about tangible improvements that we can FEEL and testify to. I say NOPE. When Bush took over after Clinton, whether you agrees with the direction or not, none of us could deny that the country indeed CHANGED. Obama has been completely ineffective and invisible. He gets by based solely off his image, "swag," and racial identity. So how much of a disaster would it be if Obama were to lose this election really? I say not much. The problem with you dudes is that you let MSNBC and liberal entertainers/quasi-analysts dictate your mindset....y'all are no worse than the zombies and cacs who swear by FoxNews. I voted for Obama 4 years ago, I see that he has been more than underwhelming and that Romney is an idiot so I'm staying home this time. It's that simple. fukk I look like waking up early on my born day to vote for these fukking clowns? :rudy:


This overall problem is people who are grossly uneducated like yourself. The bolded is what I'm talking about. You're accusing people of letting MSNBC dictate what they think, but you let your own lack of education and intellectually curiosity dictate what you think and somehow think that makes you an independent mind instead of the low-information voter (or non-voter) that you are. You have no frame of reference or knowledge base and are speaking in decontextualized generalities because you're attempting to make an analysis devoid of facts.

If you knew anything about anything, you wouldn't make such an ignorant comparison and conclusions to Clinton and Obama's presidencies. I already tried to explain this too you.

Do you honestly think the boom that happened in the 90's was directly because of Clinton? :laff: Clinton entered office while we were coming out of a recession. He rode the gigantic bubble of the tech boom and the artificially low interest rates under Greenspan's Fed. He did make the right call on raising taxes, but you're a conservative so you probably wouldn't be for that anyway. And he had an opposition party that was willing to work with him, especially in his 2nd term. So let me ask you, what specifically did Clinton do that changed the economy? I'll wait...

And why are you leaving out the fact that Clinton and his boys Rubin and Summers deregulated the banking industry and those actions led DIRECTLY the financial collapse of 2008 Obama inherited? Clinton repealed the Glass-Steagall Act and deregulated the mass trading of derivatives against the better judgment of some of his key advisors. And he admitted he was wrong. Clinton: I Was Wrong to Listen to Wrong Advice Against Regulating Derivatives* - ABC News

Obama inherited the worst financial collapse since the Great Depression. The banking system collapsed and the economy was hemorrhaging 750,000 jobs per months when he got into office. And as stated before, Obama faced an unprecedented level of obstruction that no President in history ever had to deal with. They Republicans set the bar so that 60 Senate votes were needed to pass anything through Congress. You're probably like Gundam and Sly and didn't even know how a filibuster works and how its been used during the Obama administration. The stimulus had to be scaled down to about half of what his economics team wanted and made 40% tax cuts to get 3 Republican votes and pass.

The American Jobs bill that Obama proposed, which contains many what would traditionally be considered Republican ideas, would probably create about 1.9 million jobs according to Moody's. But it won't pass because Repubs keep blocking it.

And despite that, after the stimulus and the Fed's action, the economy went from freefall and GDP loss of -1 to -8% for the most of 6 fiscal quarters. Then it started growing from 2-4% for another 6 quarters in 2009-2010 after the stimulus. And 4.5 jobs were created after the recession bottomed out.

Has his record on the economy been impressive as we would've liked? No. But asking "How has your life changed since he came into office" is a stupid ass question because it fails to take into account that he inherited a colossal recession and financial collapse, that would've become a Depression if not for the actions his administration and the Fed took, the fact that he's only the President, and has to deal with a Congress, which has been far and away the most obstructive in the history of the nation, and the fact that the jobs of the old days are gone and not coming back and we have to adjust to that.

Saying "Clinton did good and Obama did bad" is simplistic, idiotic child-like thinking. It's like saying Kobe sucked in 06-07 because he was playing with Smush Parker and Kwame Brown and didn't make it past the first round and Paul Pierce was the best player in the league in 08 because he played with KG and Ray Allen and the won the championship.

No President would have the economy rolling again right now. Look at how long it took FDR to the get economic growth going again during the GD. And FDR laid the groundwork for regulations and more sound policy for the economic mobility of the middle class like shoring up the banking system and creating social security reaped benefits for people decades later. If you just looked at his record after one term by today's stupid ass attention deficit disorder analysis, he would've been one of the shyttiest Presidents ever, worse than Obama. These systemic problems of an unstable banking system, trade policy, deindustrialization, income inequality, bad monetary policy, competition from emerging nations, rising debt, and shift in modes of employment are 10, 20, 30 year trends and are not going to be fixed in four year presidential terms.

I know your response will probably be a laugh smiley, some silly insult about being an Obama dikkrider and a complete avoidance of every point I raised, but people like you sicken me because you dwell in ignorance and refuse to even try educate yourself about anything. People who think like you are the type of people who said Obama isn't do good enough so I'm going to vote for these tea party lunatics in the 2010 mid-term. You think you're above the fray because you're "non-partisan" yet you don't know shyt about shyt and wallow in your own apathy and ignorance, have no context for any of the statements you make, are completely in the dark about the machinery of policy, and just speak in basic ass surface level platitudes. Low-information citizens like you are the reason the country is so fukked up. If you choose to be a blank slate, so be it, but just be quiet about politics and government. You do need to stay home on November 7th because you're clueless. /End rant.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-150
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL
You are just exposing your laziness, people should do their own research on third parties

I've done my research on third parties...that has nothing to do with the laziness of people who don't look for something else. They are either too busy looking at sports and American Idol or don't want to be labeled as wasting a vote on third parties.

:fight:
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Bushed
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,662
Reputation
540
Daps
22,598
Reppin
Arrakis
I've done my research on third parties...that has nothing to do with the laziness of people who don't look for something else. They are either too busy looking at sports and American Idol or don't want to be labeled as wasting a vote on third parties.

:fight:

If people want to watch sports and American idol that's on them, but not being satisfied with the major parties or the media is not an excuse not to vote

Like I said voting is bigger than just voting for president, it's about civic engagement and local issues also
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
43,994
Reputation
2,191
Daps
128,947
:clap: exactly, I say this all the time, the elderly vote can is one of major areas politicians target. Why? because they know they'll vote rain or shine, they don't have anything else to do :beli:



He goes irrational tangents about :obama: being a terrorist and telling people not vote semi-monthly. It's kind of annoying by now.

What the f*ck does this have to do with anything. You mentioned 2001, guess who was president in 2001. Guess how we got into this economic crisis. If Lupe is such a political activist, how come if wasn't saying sh*t about bush / cheney during their reign of terror, at minimum when he came on the scene in 06. He sounds like he comes off like he learned politics overnight or by watching some pseudo intellectual youtube video. :comeon: Two back to back wars, while cutting taxes.

The U.S. budget went from being 9+ trillion in the surplus, to 13 trillion in the hole. No mention of that. I think most people lack the complexity to fully understand how delicate foreign policy. See an earlier post of mine.....

trust me I'm fully aware of how we got in this economic crisis, and who is responsible for it in the first place. some of the people who were responsible(besides bush) for it still hold important positions in the federal reserve AS WELL as on our presidents economic adviser board. In 06, he wasn't even a entertainer he was just getting his feet wet. now he has the opportunity with his new found power as well as developed friendships with cornel west ,harry belafonte etc to spread what he really believes in. Do i agree with everything he has to say?:ld: hell no but im glad he has decided to speak up instead of settling down for mediocrity


The U.S. budget went from being 9+ trillion in the surplus, to 13 trillion in the hole. No mention of that. I think most people lack the complexity to fully understand how delicate foreign policy. See an earlier post of mine.....

market economies are inherently unstable, this was going to happen with/without bush because of deregulation policies that exist. he just made it a hell of a lot worse than what we envisioned.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
43,994
Reputation
2,191
Daps
128,947
This overall problem is people who are grossly uneducated like yourself. The bolded is what I'm talking about. You're accusing people of letting MSNBC dictate what they think, but you let your own lack of education and intellectually curiosity dictate what you think and somehow think that makes you an independent mind instead of the low-information voter (or non-voter) that you are. You have no frame of reference or knowledge base and are speaking in decontextualized generalities because you're attempting to make an analysis devoid of facts.

If you knew anything about anything, you wouldn't make such an ignorant comparison and conclusions to Clinton and Obama's presidencies. I already tried to explain this too you.

Do you honestly think the boom that happened in the 90's was directly because of Clinton? :laff: Clinton entered office while we were coming out of a recession. He rode the gigantic bubble of the tech boom and the artificially low interest rates under Greenspan's Fed. He did make the right call on raising taxes, but you're a conservative so you probably wouldn't be for that anyway. And he had an opposition party that was willing to work with him, especially in his 2nd term. So let me ask you, what specifically did Clinton do that changed the economy? I'll wait...

And why are you leaving out the fact that Clinton and his boys Rubin and Summers deregulated the banking industry and those actions led DIRECTLY the financial collapse of 2008 Obama inherited? Clinton repealed the Glass-Steagall Act and deregulated the mass trading of derivatives against the better judgment of some of his key advisors. And he admitted he was wrong. Clinton: I Was Wrong to Listen to Wrong Advice Against Regulating Derivatives* - ABC News

Obama inherited the worst financial collapse since the Great Depression. The banking system collapsed and the economy was hemorrhaging 750,000 jobs per months when he got into office. And as stated before, Obama faced an unprecedented level of obstruction that no President in history ever had to deal with. They Republicans set the bar so that 60 Senate votes were needed to pass anything through Congress. You're probably like Gundam and Sly and didn't even know how a filibuster works and how its been used during the Obama administration. The stimulus had to be scaled down to about half of what his economics team wanted and made 40% tax cuts to get 3 Republican votes and pass.

The American Jobs bill that Obama proposed, which contains many what would traditionally be considered Republican ideas, would probably create about 1.9 million jobs according to Moody's. But it won't pass because Repubs keep blocking it.

And despite that, after the stimulus and the Fed's action, the economy went from freefall and GDP loss of -1 to -8% for the most of 6 fiscal quarters. Then it started growing from 2-4% for another 6 quarters in 2009-2010 after the stimulus. And 4.5 jobs were created after the recession bottomed out.

Has his record on the economy been impressive as we would've liked? No. But asking "How has your life changed since he came into office" is a stupid ass question because it fails to take into account that he inherited a colossal recession and financial collapse, that would've become a Depression if not for the actions his administration and the Fed took, the fact that he's only the President, and has to deal with a Congress, which has been far and away the most obstructive in the history of the nation, and the fact that the jobs of the old days are gone and not coming back and we have to adjust to that.

Saying "Clinton did good and Obama did bad" is simplistic, idiotic child-like thinking. It's like saying Kobe sucked in 06-07 because he was playing with Smush Parker and Kwame Brown and didn't make it past the first round and Paul Pierce was the best player in the league in 08 because he played with KG and Ray Allen and the won the championship.

No President would have the economy rolling again right now. Look at how long it took FDR to the get economic growth going again during the GD. And FDR laid the groundwork for regulations and more sound policy for the economic mobility of the middle class like shoring up the banking system and creating social security reaped benefits for people decades later. If you just looked at his record after one term by today's stupid ass attention deficit disorder analysis, he would've been one of the shyttiest Presidents ever, worse than Obama. These systemic problems of an unstable banking system, trade policy, deindustrialization, income inequality, bad monetary policy, and rising debt, and shift in modes of employment are 10, 20, 30 year trends and are not going to be fixed in four year presidential terms.

I know your response will probably be a laugh smiley, some silly insult about being an Obama dikkrider and a complete avoidance of every point I raised, but people like you sicken me because you dwell in ignorance and refuse to even try educate yourself about anything. People who think like you are the type of people who said Obama isn't do good enough so I'm going to vote for these tea party lunatics in the 2010 mid-term. You think you're above the fray because you're "non-partisan" yet you don't know shyt about shyt and wallow in your own apathy and ignorance, have no context for any of the statements you make, are completely in the dark about the machinery of policy, and just speak in basic ass surface level platitudes. Low-information citizens like you are the reason the country is so fukked up. If you choose to be a blank slate, so be it, but just be quiet about politics and government. You do need to stay home on November 7th because you're clueless. /End rant.

:obama: Clinton was a fraud thats, all i have to say
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-150
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL
If people want to watch sports and American idol that's on them, but not being satisfied with the major parties or the media is not an excuse not to vote

Like I said voting is bigger than just voting for president, it's about civic engagement and local issues also

Third Parties don't get any lee way in elections period even If I vote third party.

:to: no one said anything about local issues but again if the people are divided on issues nothing gets solved.
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
31,958
Reputation
2,692
Daps
44,031


Look, I myself have voted for third party candidates at the local level, but rooting for them at the presidential level right now is just not a good idea. Particularly, during an election like this. Like I said, I can see having this mentality in 2000, but right now there is a clear distinction between the two parties on MAJOR issues. I will be voting for third party candidates at the local level and I would even do it at the state-wide level if legitimate representatives popped up, but at the presidential level? No, you take what is going to best suit your interests. If you truly believe that there won't be significant change from either party, but you know that there are certain issues one party supports that more clearly match your interests, I think it's clear who you should vote for.

Otherwise, you're essentially throwing a hissy fit and voting against your own interests at the national level because your third party candidate is not going to get enough traction to mean anything. As far as what TUH is saying, I really do hate how you post in generalities and sit on abstract principles. It's admirable in a way, but naive in practice. It's like when Gibbs talked about the "professional left" that is all or nothing. You have a guy in TUH that clearly supports more democratic policies than he doesn't but based on a handful of issues (which the other party would be worse on) he's telling you to go vote for a 3rd party.

If everyone listened to him then a bunch of people would've voted for Kucinich and Palin would be our vice president and we would've authorized bombing Iran by now. Moreover, he references European countries which have an entirely different system of democracy. Voting completely for a third party candidate there is different because then the other parties will work with you because they need a majority coalition. This isn't Europe where 25% of you voting for a party = 25 of the total seats. It's just poor long-term strategy. If you left it up to guys like TUH, black people should not have voted for the Democratic Party because of their role in the Vietnam war.

MLK told people to go vote, WHILE protesting the Vietnam War. You cannot take an absolutist notion to politics in a pluralist society. Moreover, all these "disillusioned" people are not necessarily a coherent mass nor would they make up a coherent party. The seeds aren't even there for a legitimate third party right now because there isn't a clear group to draw it from. This isn't the populist movements of the past, this isn't William Jennings.

His idealism seldom tempers itself with pragmatism and efficacy. The Tea Party just showed you how to change the debate within your party, you don't take your ball and go home.

I just don't see how we'll ever break the 2 party system like this. the way you frame things, it'll never be 'the time'. how were things different in 2000? there wasn't a "clear distinction" between Bush and Gore?

how will there ever be "seeds" for a "legitimate third party" if no one supports? it's not magic. no amount of pessimism and appeals to conformity is gonna make it happen

and what would this topic be without bringing up non-voters. now sure many of them are just lazy and don't vote because it involves actually doing something. but many are truly disenfranchised with the shytstem. it's easy to write these people off as a bunch of dirty hippies, alex jones listeners, or whatever, but they represent a large portion of the population

I'm not sure why you brought up Kucinich, but I don't believe in the "Nader Effect"

in closing, I understand appeals to pragmatism (I will point out that framing your views as being more "pragmatic" is a form of 'poisoning the well'), but at the same time I don't think it's fair to shoot down those that want real change (I can poison the well too). it's also something where you assume a lot about another person when saying that you see them as leaning a particular way, and therefor tell them how they should vote. not to mention how this thread is about Lupe talking about not voting at all, then we find a compromise that could get many of the disenfranchised involved in the process, but then you want to shoot that down. it seems that could encourage a lot of people to just default back to not voting at all
 

Pool_Shark

Can’t move with me in this digital space
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
12,575
Reputation
1,975
Daps
25,889
Damn this is a good ass thread :popcorn: props to everyone for the discussion
 

Metta World Movement

Peace and love...to all!!
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
6,417
Reputation
-49
Daps
11,517
You know someone talks too damn much when you actually AGREE with what they're saying, yet you still want them to STFU

My GOD, this nikka can whine, moan and bytch :what:
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
79,913
Reputation
14,208
Daps
190,244
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
I just don't see how we'll ever break the 2 party system like this. the way you frame things, it'll never be 'the time'. how were things different in 2000? there wasn't a "clear distinction" between Bush and Gore?

how will there ever be "seeds" for a "legitimate third party" if no one supports? it's not magic. no amount of pessimism and appeals to conformity is gonna make it happen

Yeah I don't see how it can logically happen either. I mean hypothetically you can vote a "3rd party candidate" into office but more then likely, they will face ∞ times, the opposition in congress, that :obama: is currently under.

My compromise would be to restructure congress a bit. Model it a little more like they do in Parliament,(i think) where certain amount of representation is a certain age like (19-24) the college / young adult age and a more ethnically diverse congress. If this is the melting pot of the world, I want to see more blacks, hispancis, asians, native americans etc participate in crucial elements of the political process.

Along with reverse SuperPacs.

and what would this topic be without bringing up non-voters. now sure many of them are just lazy and don't vote because it involves actually doing something. but many are truly disenfranchised with the shytstem. it's easy to write these people off as a bunch of dirty hippies, alex jones listeners, or whatever, but they represent a large portion of the population
This is scary :to:
 
Top