Lupe Fiasco Calls Pres. Obama A Child Killer

mtu wa chuma

archangel of terror
Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
3,911
Reputation
1,385
Daps
12,665
I dont agree with lupe but its nice to see a black celebrity/person not be afraid to criticise him. we need to stop treating him like he's some kind of messiah devoid of any blame
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
18,523
Reputation
4,195
Daps
77,143
Reppin
North Jersey
but why stop there? I and millions of others voted for Obama, aren't I responsible too? What about those of use who pay taxes aka pay for those drone strikes, aren't we responsible? what about the intelligence officers and the other military personnel who help coordinate drone attacks?

Cristian on the other site got a lot of heat for being a super revolutionary but at least he knew that each cog in the wheel plays an important part. without one the machine stutters to a halt but I get what Lupe is saying
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,024
Reputation
4,716
Daps
66,875
The attempts to rationalize his continuation of military adventurism on the left has been sad, flawed, and hypocritical to say the very least. Leftist like Chris Hedges, Glenn Greenwald,Jeremy Schahill, and Jonathan Turley among others have called them out on it.

Actually, Obama has taken more accountability over this stuff than any president before him. He actually sits down and has the final call over every specific individual that is targeted by a drone strike. He demands detailed information and biographical history on each person and sits down with all of his key advisors to decide who is going to be targeted. He is in the room and at the helm of the decisions. So at the very least, he's not just saying "Go :mj:" on 'em. He's taking that moral responsibility on himself. A guy like Lupe whose biggest revolution is "dumb it out" has no basis to judge warfare. It's the guys like Lupe who critique everything from a distance but can't take criticism themselves and cannot articulate their opinions and justifications when tried on them that antagonize me the most.

He's my favorite rapper right but, :smh:
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
5,982
Daps
132,705
What do y'all think about drone bombing if there wasn't as much secrecy surrounding it and they didn't have that bullshyt definition of militants? If it was more structured, less secretive, more well-defined and limited to Al Qaeda jihadists who there is actionable intelligence to believe they are plotting attacks on the U.S., would you support it or at least be less outraged about it?

What if we began withdrawal of ground troops of Afghanistan and kept up that more well-defined, less secretive drone program?

What does everyone think our general approach and tactics toward handling Al Qaeda should be? Should military tools be used at all? What degree of surveillance and monitoring and encroachment on civil liberties should be allowed if any?
 

Metta World Movement

Peace and love...to all!!
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
6,417
Reputation
-49
Daps
11,517
I don't care if this clown was able to justify that statement. He is a fukkin' attention whore, and that cancels out any point he's trying to make. This ain't the first time he said some outlandish shyt like this.

Dude is like some anti-abortion guy who goes out in public with a megaphone, covered in fake blood and wearing nothing but a diaper. It's like, yeah we get your point, but do you REALLY have to do all of that shyt to drive it home :snoop:
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,869
Reppin
Behind You


Actually, Obama has taken more accountability over this stuff than any president before him. He actually sits down and has the final call over every specific individual that is targeted by a drone strike. He demands detailed information and biographical history on each person and sits down with all of his key advisors to decide who is going to be targeted. He is in the room and at the helm of the decisions. So at the very least, he's not just saying "Go :mj:" on 'em. He's taking that moral responsibility on himself. A guy like Lupe whose biggest revolution is "dumb it out" has no basis to judge warfare. It's the guys like Lupe who critique everything from a distance but can't take criticism themselves and cannot articulate their opinions and justifications when tried on them that antagonize me the most.

He's my favorite rapper right but, :smh:

All of that makes it worse then because he is basically saying that any innocent people being blown up accidentily don't matter as long as hecan get the second cousin of the driver of the guy who once upon a time met Osama Bin Laden in a poppy field who is possibly a terror suspect. And who gives a damn if this suspected terroristsis a United States citizen? We'll blow them up too and look for any concrete evidence from the smoking hole we leave behind after the drone attack.
Its a barbaric policy and I am in agreement with Pres. Jimmy Carter in his condemnations of the practice.
 

Gallo

Banned
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
1,982
Reputation
115
Daps
2,106
Reppin
NULL
All of that makes it worse then because he is basically saying that any innocent people being blown up accidentily don't matter as long as hecan get the second cousin of the driver of the guy who once upon a time met Osama Bin Laden in a poppy field who is possibly a terror suspect. And who gives a damn if this suspected terroristsis a United States citizen? We'll blow them up too and look for any concrete evidence from the smoking hole we leave behind after the drone attack.
Its a barbaric policy and I am in agreement with Pres. Jimmy Carter in his condemnations of the practice.

War is barbaric. Drones or no drones innocent people will die. Collateral damage is a part of war, it's not unique to drone strikes. You measure the efficacy of military war strategy if it accomplishes two things - it gets said mission done and it reduces the likelihood American military casualties. In both cases, drone strikes is good policy.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,869
Reppin
Behind You
What do y'all think about drone bombing if there wasn't as much secrecy surrounding it and they didn't have that bullshyt definition of militants? If it was more structured, less secretive, more well-defined and limited to Al Qaeda jihadists who there is actionable intelligence to believe they are plotting attacks on the U.S., would you support it or at least be less outraged about it?

What if we began withdrawal of ground troops of Afghanistan and kept up that more well-defined, less secretive drone program?

What does everyone think our general approach and tactics toward handling Al Qaeda should be? Should military tools be used at all? What degree of surveillance and monitoring and encroachment on civil liberties should be allowed if any?

I think a bit of transparency would probably help to quell some of the sense of dread I have with the program. And in the case of Afghanistan I would even be perfectly fine with a troop withdrawal and the threat of drone attacks used as the means of keeping the peace as it were.

I have always thought that we should be using high level human intelligence (instead of bought and paid for snitches or folks we have tortured) for information gathering and start treating the Al-Queda problem as a police matter as opposed to an open ended, nebulous pseudo-war that is dominated by the military defense apparatus of this country.

And I am in total agreement with Ben Franklin when it comes to giving up personal liberties in the name of perceived safety.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,247
Reputation
6,810
Daps
90,687
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
lol man this topic is weird because I feel like atheist and non religious ppl are on both sides of the playing field

Dude, lupe is coming from a standpoint that "no man has a right to take another man's life."

While the other side is coming from the "its for the greater good" area

You have to see the other mines point of view on life before you start dismissing his argument. His argument is very valid from his arena.
 
Top