Looks like we may have just got 'The List' of MLB players who tested posted for Steroids in 2003

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,462
Reputation
5,870
Daps
162,198
Reppin
PG x MD
Quite a few players from the 02 and 03 Mets is on that list.... them teams didn't even finish above 500.:martin:


Crazy that I recognize most of those names :wow: Make a list of 103 players around current day MLB and it would have me like...

who-snoop-dog.gif



And I still watch baseball :russ:
This is the real take. I’ve been a casual follower of baseball and maybe it’s because that’s back when espn still covered baseball but I recognized a lot of names on that list even after never hearing them for maybe 20 years. I’m not sure I can name you more than 20 or so players playing today and I went to multiple baseball games last season
 

manyfaces

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
9,438
Reputation
1,824
Daps
20,760
If I'm reading this/remembering players correctly, it looks like the Rays and the White Sox the only teams with nobody on this list :ehh:

They combined for 175 losses that year :mjlol:

you ain't cheating, you ain't trying :manny: don't ask me how
From a casual fans perspective seems like it was a level playing field and every was doing it... And it made for a more entertaining and popular game :manny: . LET EM JUICE! And give them their accolades as well, including HOF. And here's a novel idea for the journalist that want to be so high and mighty with their gatekeeping. Give this era the same type of recognition amongst each other as it seems this was a leaguewide thing, including those that were elite during this time getting the credit for being elite amongst their peers. That includes HOF too. And then actually write compelling stories about the times and players so you can shape the narrative for that period how you see fit, because that's what your talent is supposed to be. Ultimately the public will take it all in a decide how much they give a fukk either way. This cockblocking and gatekeeping HOF honors is and has always been hoe shyt and reeks of nerds revenge on the jocks type shyt. All that sanctimonious "they ruined the game that I love" shyt is whiny bullshyt to me. I just think of Lupica as the mascot for those type dweebs feeling like they finally got their get back on the popular guy with shyt like that.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
32,495
Reputation
9,909
Daps
108,681
Reppin
Brooklyn
From a casual fans perspective seems like it was a level playing field and every was doing it... And it made for a more entertaining and popular game :manny: . LET EM JUICE! And give them their accolades as well, including HOF. And here's a novel idea for the journalist that want to be so high and mighty with their gatekeeping. Give this era the same type of recognition amongst each other as it seems this was a leaguewide thing, including those that were elite during this time getting the credit for being elite amongst their peers. That includes HOF too. And then actually write compelling stories about the times and players so you can shape the narrative for that period how you see fit, because that's what your talent is supposed to be. Ultimately the public will take it all in a decide how much they give a fukk either way. This cockblocking and gatekeeping HOF honors is and has always been hoe shyt and reeks of nerds revenge on the jocks type shyt. All that sanctimonious "they ruined the game that I love" shyt is whiny bullshyt to me. I just think of Lupica as the mascot for those type dweebs feeling like they finally got their get back on the popular guy with shyt like that.
None of these a$$holes want to give credit to that era for saving baseball after the owners staged a coup against Faye Vincent and made bud selig commissioner who played a big role in the strike that canceled the 1994 playoffs entirely and nearly killed baseball entirely. fukk anyone who votes against the greats of the 90’s & 2000’s over that shyt. Those guys saved the owners from themselves. Note how no other sport cares about PED tests anyway. Julius Peppers failed a test his rookie year for example and nobody cares, nor does anyone refuse to give him his due as one of the great defensive linemen of his era or any era for that matter. There wasn’t even a ban on most of these substances at the time anyway.
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,694
Reputation
7,255
Daps
182,978
is this the first time Pedro has been implicated? Never seen him connected to roids
 

Trojan 24

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
40,369
Reputation
4,269
Daps
152,940
Reppin
Just Win Baby
From a casual fans perspective seems like it was a level playing field and every was doing it... And it made for a more entertaining and popular game :manny: . LET EM JUICE! And give them their accolades as well, including HOF. And here's a novel idea for the journalist that want to be so high and mighty with their gatekeeping. Give this era the same type of recognition amongst each other as it seems this was a leaguewide thing, including those that were elite during this time getting the credit for being elite amongst their peers. That includes HOF too. And then actually write compelling stories about the times and players so you can shape the narrative for that period how you see fit, because that's what your talent is supposed to be. Ultimately the public will take it all in a decide how much they give a fukk either way. This cockblocking and gatekeeping HOF honors is and has always been hoe shyt and reeks of nerds revenge on the jocks type shyt. All that sanctimonious "they ruined the game that I love" shyt is whiny bullshyt to me. I just think of Lupica as the mascot for those type dweebs feeling like they finally got their get back on the popular guy with shyt like that.

Tbh the NFL has unofficially gone that way. If you talk to guys around the league they tell you it's very easy to get around testing protocols and that's not by mistake
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
112
Reputation
20
Daps
579
Reppin
LI,NY
Bud Selig as owner of the Brewers openly colluded with the other owners to lowball top free agent players in the 1980s', backed his same buddy buddy owner network that caused the '94 Lockout, then rode the coattails of the players back to baseballs revival in the late 90s. He was elected to the Hall of Fame by some committee with like 95% of the vote.

I was growing up in the 2000's so I wasnt fully aware to how big of a thing this was, but I'm sure it sucked to have the suspected users constantly lie to the public's face and then embarass themselves when they had to testify to Congress.

Still IMO there's still no reason for them not to be on the same ballots that include the managers and owners of that era whose win tallys and income benefited directly from those same player's production
 
Top