#BOTHSIDES
All Star
But yall better go vote for them and vote Democrat
Look at how Dem shills are attacking Brother Cornel West
- Thread starter SnugglesDaBear
- Start date
Obama got healthcare for poor people who didn't have it before as well as those who had pre-existing conditions (like diabetes). What racial group do you know that disproportionately represents poor people? Stop looking for benefits that say "THIS IS FOR BLACK PEOPLE" in the title. He did other things as well, but Dems are notoriously garbage in the art of bragging.Obama aint do shyt for black people in eight years. Stop glazing u weak ass nikka
Detroit Wave
Veteran
If black people are pushed back on their own 5 yd line and every body else is on their own 10 yd line, a 10 yd penalty moves both teams up 10 yds, black people are still ultimately 5 yds behind and back at square one.
Long story short, them fakkits need to cut that reparations check.
I Really Mean It
Veteran
this is appallingly ignorant of history.
first, no country has ever attempted to “take the USA down,” so you can’t argue that it isn’t possible. the us lost to a militarily inferior insurgency in indochina. second, history is filled with multiple examples of a militarily outmatched insurgency from within overturning an oppressive state.
a lot of you sound weak as fukk, like the idea of white liberals/democrats not being in office sends you into a cold sweat.
Bills and lawsuits like what? Show me where they're advocating for us.
Also, I hate to break it to you...brace yourself...Thurgood Marshall died 30 years ago
Born2BKing
Veteran
You want reparations right? Do you think SC justices who are Democrats are just as likely to strike down the enviable lawsuits that will come with it and be seen by the Supreme Court?Bills and lawsuits like what? Show me where they're advocating for us.
Also, I hate to break it to you...brace yourself...Thurgood Marshall died 30 years ago
Let me show you the response of the black woman appointed by Biden who is a Democrat to her white Republican colleagues on getting rid of Affirmative Action.
Abcarian: On affirmative action, Justice Jackson blasts her colleagues' 'let-them-eat-cake obliviousness'
The Supreme Court's conservative majority could really use a history lesson about racism's legacy.
www.latimes.com
Jackson argues persuasively that we are not even close to living in a country where all are on an equal playing field, and that “holistic” admissions policies that take race into account as one factor are important steps toward a more equal world.
“With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces ‘colorblindness for all’ by legal fiat,” writes Jackson. “But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life.”
She asks us to imagine two college applicants from North Carolina: John, who is white, would be the seventh generation of his family to attend the University of North Carolina. James, who is Black and most likely descended from enslaved forebears, would be the first member of his family to attend college. “Does the race of these applicants properly play a role in UNC’s holistic merits-based application process?” she asks. The school has no racial quota system. It only takes race into account as one of many factors.
Our newest justice offers a history lesson to her fellow conservatives about why it should. “A page of history is worth a volume of logic,” she writes, quoting Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. Her insinuation: The majority cannot see the forest for the trees.
“Given the lengthy history of state-sponsored, race-based preferences in America” (which have always favored white people), she writes, “to say that anyone is now victimized if a college considers whether that legacy of discrimination has unequally advantaged its applicants fails to acknowledge the well documented ‘intergenerational transmission of inequality’ that still plagues our country.”
She lists the familiar ways that the prosperity of Black Americans has been hindered by laws and government policies.
Soylent Greenz
All Star
Lol usual players in here....these threads are like a Bat Signal to them.
AA =/= reparations. Show me somewhere she's advocating something for Black people.You want reparations right? Do you think SC justices who are Democrats are just as likely to strike down the enviable lawsuits that will come with it and be seen by the Supreme Court?
Let me show you the response of the black woman appointed by Biden who is a Democrat to her white Republican colleagues on getting rid of Affirmative Action.
Abcarian: On affirmative action, Justice Jackson blasts her colleagues' 'let-them-eat-cake obliviousness'
The Supreme Court's conservative majority could really use a history lesson about racism's legacy.
Jackson argues persuasively that we are not even close to living in a country where all are on an equal playing field, and that “holistic” admissions policies that take race into account as one factor are important steps toward a more equal world.
“With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces ‘colorblindness for all’ by legal fiat,” writes Jackson. “But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life.”
She asks us to imagine two college applicants from North Carolina: John, who is white, would be the seventh generation of his family to attend the University of North Carolina. James, who is Black and most likely descended from enslaved forebears, would be the first member of his family to attend college. “Does the race of these applicants properly play a role in UNC’s holistic merits-based application process?” she asks. The school has no racial quota system. It only takes race into account as one of many factors.
Our newest justice offers a history lesson to her fellow conservatives about why it should. “A page of history is worth a volume of logic,” she writes, quoting Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. Her insinuation: The majority cannot see the forest for the trees.
“Given the lengthy history of state-sponsored, race-based preferences in America” (which have always favored white people), she writes, “to say that anyone is now victimized if a college considers whether that legacy of discrimination has unequally advantaged its applicants fails to acknowledge the well documented ‘intergenerational transmission of inequality’ that still plagues our country.”
She lists the familiar ways that the prosperity of Black Americans has been hindered by laws and government policies.
this is appallingly ignorant of history.
first, no country has ever attempted to “take the USA down,” so you can’t argue that it isn’t possible. the us lost to a militarily inferior insurgency in indochina. second, history is filled with multiple examples of a militarily outmatched insurgency from within overturning an oppressive state.
a lot of you sound weak as fukk, like the idea of white liberals/democrats not being in office sends you into a cold sweat.
Show me the black people uncomfortable enough in America to start a war and die. Black comortability levels are still at all time highs of 93%
Born2BKing
Veteran
She literally said in her response that laws and governance is hindering the prosperity of BLACK Americans. She is a judge, not a damn Congress woman or Senator.
All talk. Usual Dem bullshyt. Anyone can advocate if they mean it...She literally said in her response that laws and governance is hindering the prosperity of BLACK Americans. She is a judge, not a damn Congress woman or Senator.
Born2BKing
Veteran
All talk? nikka she on the SUPREME COURT.
Born2BKing
Veteran
Do you have a concept of how that works and what would need to happen in order for that to occur? Or do you think Biden can simply cut a check tomorrow?
Kyle C. Barker
Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Don't mind him. He's from the UK and prefers monarchies for some weird reason. He barely even thinks white supremacy exists.