the defense attorney finally got her inability to articulate what she means to work against her.
Fact. The girl never said "What you talkin bout" under oath. She said that in the very 1st interview with Krump (which she said she didn't care about & 'rushed')
But what the Defense made it look like she, is that she said that under oath during the deposition.
Fact. What happened at the deposition was that the Defense did ask her about her about what she said during the
informal Krump interview.
Fact. Today...the defense attorney got her to use (tricked her) the Krump interview as a basis of an under oath testimony by asking her again if she said that during the deposition (when in reality she was just answering the question posed to her during the depo about the Krump interview). This has now created 2 opposing statements that they can use against her to undermine her credibility.
Ole girl sitting up there totally confused like