Good job, good effort... Defense...
You're trying to create a smoke screen. You initially said that following someone isn't against the law when it clearly is under certain circumstances. I'm not arguing that Zimmerman was breaking the law by following Martin, I'm saying that the fact that he was following Martin is evidence/proof that he instigated the confrontation. You're trying to argue that we don't know who instigated the confrontation between Zimmermann and Martin to try and pre emptively justify the jury in case that let Zimmermann walk. You aren't slick.you have to know the legal definition of stalking in Florida... stalking is the repeated harassing and following of someone.. Zimmerman didn't do that... That's the only point I was making...
Florida Stalking Laws - FindLaw
784.048 Stalking Defined as willful, malicious, and repeated following or harassing.
(704.048(2)); Aggravated stalking: willful, malicious and repeated following or harassing another with credible threats with the intent to place person in reasonable fear of death or bodily injury; or willfully, maliciously, repeatedly follows or harasses minor under 16; or after injunction for protection or any court-imposed prohibition of conduct, knowingly, willfully, maliciously and repeatedly follows or harasses another person.
Your mother uses too much teeth when she sucks dikk.You're too homotional
Go fukk yourself, man.
Just log off, man.
the younger state attorney need to stand his case for his legal approach
Paul Blart about get picked apart with this new evidence