You two may call that a strawman argument that he is making,but you would have to agree that your example using white people is one hell of a false equivelancy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4744d/4744d6999e65348afed793bfbe500ee8a41b0d15" alt=":respect: :respect: :respect:"
. Being that they are about 65% of the population,a few whites should wander off into our rallys. But even if they do history has shown that whites have mental illness and alterior motives for involving themselves in our movements. Whether it be them just being flat out nosey as usual,agents,white guilt,white savior complex. All of which aren't genuine and are unwelcomed,but more importantly don't make up for the actions of their ancestors.He proved his point by posting multiple images of mexicans showing support which a poster said they never see. The rest of you just tried to muddy the water by shytting on BLM. While I agree with you about BLM,you can't expect Mexicans to know better when black people don't. I'm not sure where yall live where yall have this many problems with Mexicans. This must be a regional thing just like people who have problems with Africans. I'm not denying peoples experiences are real, but just because yall say "Mexicans hate us" or "Africans hate us" is not neccessarily a true statement. We can use deductive,and inductive reasoning to draw the conclusion about cacs being inherently evil. Now if you want to argue we shouldn't give other races a chance, by all means. But yall gotta stop with passing off these personal experiences,or what you've seen in movies,or heard about through friends as fact. Only race that has proven to deserve a strong rebuking and racist counter attack is the European. Africans certainly deserve a case by case basis,if not the assumption they don't hate AA's.