Libertarians - The Great White Hope

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

Overwhelming majority of racist are republican, not libertarian. Stop

Heres the problem you seem to miss

Overwhelming majority of libertarians are racist too

And they talk about "freedom", but are anti abortion and gay marriage

But why wouldnt you support such hypocrisy and stupidity... youre a fukking idiot

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_perspectives_on_foreign_intervention

well to hell with libertarians.

I dont believe in isolationism...merely because no one else does.

 

[88m3]

Evidence?

http://theredphoenix.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/ron-paul-with-white-nationalist-st0rmfr0nt-owner-don-black-and-son-derick-black5.jpg

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

So we're gonna legitimize the fallacy of composition. Well in that case you are all... Let me stop.

unless we're gonna legitimize the fact your arguments aren't internally consistent

 

[88m3]

Heres the problem you seem to miss

Overwhelming majority of libertarians are racist too

And they talk about "freedom", but are anti abortion and gay marriage

But why wouldnt you support such hypocrisy and stupidity... youre a fukking idiot

lol you beat me to the punch

 

[DEAD7]

Point is for you economic laisser-faire seems to be the alpha and omega about everything, but the very example you gave shows signs of strong gvt intrusion/intervention. All the while other countries may have slightly less economic "freedom", but I doubt anyone would say that the countries I quoted are not economically free. All the while ALSO having political freedom as well as social policies.

As I stated its about trade offs. Not one way or the other, I personally lean towards the model offering the highest economic freedom, while you lean towards some other metric. its not a right vs wrong situation...

Unless your a fan of what we have here in the U.S. then you're just wrong.

 

[mbewane]

As I stated its about trade offs. Not one way or the other, I personally lean towards the model offering the highest economic freedom, while you lean towards some other metric. its not a right vs wrong situation...

Unless your a fan of what we have here in the U.S. then you're just wrong.

Rest assured I'm not lol

 

[88m3]

As I stated its about trade offs. Not one way or the other, I personally lean towards the model offering the highest economic freedom, while you lean towards some other metric. its not a right vs wrong situation...

Unless your a fan of what we have here in the U.S. then you're just wrong.

I don't see why so many people on this site act as if a White Nationalist can't be a Libertarian. Or why so many don't recognize the difference between anarcho-libertarianism and conservative libertarianism.

You're saying if Ron Paul supported having an all white America, that was governed by white people, but none of his other views changed, that he would be an enemy of White Nationalism and could not be a white Nationalist himself?

I don't like the government, especially the central government, prodding it's filthy head into things that it doesn't need to. And for the 90% of things that the government does need to be involved in, it can and should be done at the state or local level where it is more transparent and accountable. I don't even think you should be able to notice the central gov. in your day to day life. The central gov. should be as small as possible, and definitely not be more powerful than any individual state.

One thing that they got right in the Constitution was that states are to be able to take care of everything that they possibly can, without the federal government bothering them. We can see how well that has been upheld. There needs to be new amendments giving clear and descriptive rights to the states, that take power away from the feds.

A 100% Libertarian (Anacho-Libertarianism) gov. IS just an unrealistic fantasy. But, conservative-Libertarianism (the least amount of government interference the country can have, while still being secure and functioning.) Is clearly realistic, as that point has to exist in the political spectrum.

The confederate states were very Libertarian, did they function, or was that just a fantasy?

Libertarianism is pretty much the opposite of what a Nationalist stands for. Fascism is about a government that works, that takes care of the people, and builds things. (Autobahn anyone? The Nazis were VERY big on government work projects and good infrastructure!)

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

well to hell with libertarians.

I dont believe in isolationism...merely because no one else does.

I think isolationism is an idea worth exploring. If not full isolationsism, at least exploring the idea of scaling back our foreign operations.

My big beef with libertarians (and ideological extremists of any bend) is the inconistency/hypocrisy, which largely stems from 2 things. 1, the inability of someone who buys into a philosophy 100% to think for themselves, and 2 the unrealistic prospect of ideological extremism applied practically. Lefties are anti-war but were quiet as fukk when it turned out Obama was turning up the drone campaign. Conservatives literally don't stand for anything. They talk about fiscal conservatism and personal freedoms but support the party whose grandfather is Reagan (the godfather of modern deficit spending), and whose representatives literally go against everything they stand for. Seriously, name a conservative cornerstone and I will point you to a loudmouthed conservative who reversed on it. Libertarians want small government and big personal freedoms... except for women and gays. ANYBODY who buys into these ideologies and their supporting parties 100% (i.e. @DEAD7 ) is a fukking IDIOT.

 

[DEAD7]

Heres the problem you seem to miss

Overwhelming majority of libertarians are racist too

And they talk about "freedom", but are anti abortion and gay marriage

But why wouldnt you support such hypocrisy and stupidity... youre a fukking idiot

http://theredphoenix.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/ron-paul-with-white-nationalist-st0rmfr0nt-owner-don-black-and-son-derick-black5.jpg

lol you beat me to the punch

So because Ron Paul associated with a racist he is one? and because he is a racist his ending the drug war policy must be bad for blacks?

The mental gymnastics you niqqas go to discredit sound policies is amazing.

Lemme guess because he is racist, he wants to stop bombing brown countries to watch them starve We should reject that and blow them f*cker sup.


"your party has more racist than mine" is really the argument you guys have come to

@GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! Show me a party free of hypocrisy Dont worry I'll wait


You are literally presenting argument that arent even arguments at this point. Only thing left is personal attacks, and i'm sure they are being loaded

 

[DEAD7]

I don't see why so many people on this site act as if a White Nationalist can't be a Libertarian. Or why so many don't recognize the difference between anarcho-libertarianism and conservative libertarianism.

You're saying if Ron Paul supported having an all white America, that was governed by white people, but none of his other views changed, that he would be an enemy of White Nationalism and could not be a white Nationalist himself?

I don't like the government, especially the central government, prodding it's filthy head into things that it doesn't need to. And for the 90% of things that the government does need to be involved in, it can and should be done at the state or local level where it is more transparent and accountable. I don't even think you should be able to notice the central gov. in your day to day life. The central gov. should be as small as possible, and definitely not be more powerful than any individual state.

One thing that they got right in the Constitution was that states are to be able to take care of everything that they possibly can, without the federal government bothering them. We can see how well that has been upheld. There needs to be new amendments giving clear and descriptive rights to the states, that take power away from the feds.

A 100% Libertarian (Anacho-Libertarianism) gov. IS just an unrealistic fantasy. But, conservative-Libertarianism (the least amount of government interference the country can have, while still being secure and functioning.) Is clearly realistic, as that point has to exist in the political spectrum.

The confederate states were very Libertarian, did they function, or was that just a fantasy?

Libertarianism is pretty much the opposite of what a Nationalist stands for. Fascism is about a government that works, that takes care of the people, and builds things. (Autobahn anyone? The Nazis were VERY big on government work projects and good infrastructure!)

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I think isolationism is an idea worth exploring. If not full isolationsism, at least exploring the idea of scaling back our foreign operations.

My big beef with libertarians (and ideological extremists of any bend) is the inconistency/hypocrisy, which largely stems from 2 things. 1, the inability of someone who buys into a philosophy 100% to think for themselves, and 2 the unrealistic prospect of ideological extremism applied practically. Lefties are anti-war but were quiet as fukk when it turned out Obama was turning up the drone campaign. Conservatives literally don't stand for anything. They talk about fiscal conservatism and personal freedoms but support the party whose grandfather is Reagan (the godfather of modern deficit spending), and whose representatives literally go against everything they stand for. Seriously, name a conservative cornerstone and I will point you to a loudmouthed conservative who reversed on it. Libertarians want small government and big personal freedoms... except for women and gays. ANYBODY who buys into these ideologies and their supporting parties 100% (i.e. @DEAD7 ) is a fukking IDIOT.

 

[Odyssey]

Here is a classic example of how a complex racial and social society ruins liberty.

Hey dad, i am paying 40,000k a year to get a worthless degree so butthurt minorities can write racist stuff on my face. What a great country we have now

Society was set up for us, so now i am a fakkit

 

[88m3]

Here is a classic example of how a complex racial and social society ruins liberty.

Hey dad, i am paying 40,000k a year to get a worthless degree so butthurt minorities can write racist stuff on my face. What a great country we have now

Society was set up for us, so now i am a fakkit

Thank the free market you poor fakkit.

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

Here is a classic example of how a complex racial and social society ruins liberty.

Hey dad, i am paying 40,000k a year to get a worthless degree so butthurt minorities can write racist stuff on my face. What a great country we have now

Society was set up for us, so now i am a fakkit

Is this supposed to be sarcasm

White men have nothing to cry about. Paul Mooney said it best. "When I see a homeless white man, I think 'what a waste of white skin'." If a white man feels threatened by society it is because he chooses to be a victim. Nobody has it better.