If this cac doesn't get the
You first, cac.
What? I'm hawaiian and in hawaii, any more BS you wanna rant about?
If this cac doesn't get the
You first, cac.
So what would constitute a racist black person to you? By definition, all they would have to do is believe that they're superior to another race. Hebrew Israelites standing on a corner and calling white people dirty savages, devils, saying that they should be exterminated, and listing perceived negative race-specific qualities (smell like wet dog, etc.) is racist BY DEFINITION. Are they oppressing them? No, but by the very definition of the word - they are 100% racist. How can you possibly argue that? So let's say a KKK member gets life in prison and can no longer practice nor benefit from so called "institutionalized racism." By your logic, that would make them no longer racist. Is that correct? Now what if they break out of prison? Are they now racist again? I'm just trying to understand your logic because it makes no sense to me at all. It seems like you're just going off emotion and basically making up your own rules and definitions in order to justify your feelings of black people not being able to be racist even though you've been shown stone-cold facts that prove that it's possible and happens all the time. You asked for proof, you got it, and you still choose to ignore it. Why even have a discussion, then?I get what you're saying, I'm not trippin'. I did post another definition and dude didn't like that. And I posted yet another. Maybe he'll like that better. I don't really care about being wrong, mane. Like I said, I'm not going to change my opinion until I see racist black people. One person said hoteps and I would have to look more into that to see if I think it's racist. I'm not twisting facts, I'm interpreting what's being presented to me. If I'm wrong, that's ok. That will just be the part where we disagree.
I cant* naturally trust a ruling from a racist court system. If I'm dumb, I wont be for too long because I'll look into the info you were nice enough to post. Maybe I'll eventually see it your way.breh. either you can post other definitions of the word RACIST or not.
all these theatrics and emotions are not necessary. all of our googles work breh
everybody on here can see that the word RACIST and RACISM have different definitions
I also posted a link to actual major court cases where BLACK PEOPLE discriminated against WHITE PEOPLE
so posting the actual definition of the word "RACISM" over and over again is making you all look dumb too, because we've been caught doing that as well:
reverse <<<< read.
...I'm white. I could care less. Dig your own grave.
Your a fukking joke . your obviously either white or hispanic. Anyhow go fukk yourself. You muthufukkas are obsessed with black peope
Im not ignoring it. I'm thinking about it. I don't agree with the dictionary definition. I believe there has to be a successful practice in asserting superiority. I also believe that it cannot be reactionary to white supremacy. I haven't seen that yet.So what would constitute a racist black person to you? By definition, all they would have to do is believe that they're superior to another race. Hebrew Israelites standing on a corner and calling white people dirty savages, devils, saying that they should be exterminated, and listing perceived negative race-specific qualities (smell like wet dog, etc.) is racist BY DEFINITION. Are they oppressing them? No, but by the very definition of the word - they are 100% racist. How can you possibly argue that? So let's say a KKK member gets life in prison and can no longer practice nor benefit from so called "institutionalized racism." By your logic, that would make them no longer racist. Is that correct? Now what if they break out of prison? Are they now racist again? I'm just trying to understand your logic because it makes no sense to me at all. It seems like you're just going off emotion and basically making up your own rules and definitions in order to justify your feelings of black people not being able to be racist even though you've been shown stone-cold facts that prove that it's possible and happens all the time. You asked for proof, you got it, and you still choose to ignore it. Why even have a discussion, then?
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/dont-raise-your-kids-around-cacs-jaden-smith-yall.432243/
op claimed he's white on the first page of that thread now you're pretending to be black?
I say cautious is totally fair and responsible. Personally, I'm suspicious. Not sure if that's the samd thing.Seeing as I don't have negative feeling towards any group besides cac. I will say that I'm highly CAUTIOUS not racist. My caution comed from having knowledge of history and based on life experiences.
WTF? What does benefiting animals with money have to do with anything? Animal live stock is top priority for any culture. I would rather pay in health benifactors to my own live stock then give money to a bum on the stree
In that case both should get the hell out of america, neither or white or black is indigenous, but we've earned the right to be here...how? By killing off all the indigenous.
Who gives a fukk, is this black land? Is this white land? Both of you'z should then GTFO. None of you are indigenous, so dont try and justify you being in america.
You're confusing racism with discriminationThat's not the definition of racism. Just because some Cac came up with that definition doesn't make it true.
There's only one functional form of racism on the planet and that's white supremacy.
I rarely see the same passion and scholarship when the discussion is on the impact of institutional racism...
...They don't care about the arguments...it's just words to distract