Yes if your definition is along the lines of "1 race believing they are superior to another"
I say sticks and stones may break my bones but institutional racism will encourage the rape, genocide, and the high-school to prison pipeline of Black people.
The question should really be "why do so many people ignore the impact of institutional racism, and instead prop up their name-calling version as the definition?
Why do they argue so vehemently in proving that Black people can be racist? I rarely see the same passion and scholarship when the discussion is on the impact of institutional racism, and making amends for it.
A few signs that you're dealing with a suspected White supremacist or newblack:
They care more about whether or not Black people can be racist, than actual institutional racism.
They are upset at not being "allowed" to say nikka/er, and believe "nobody should say it" if other groups can't.
They reference Chicago's Black on Black crime more than Chicago's corrupt police officers.
They sign petitions and raise funds for animals yet keep their wallet closed when a Black person is blasted away by a racist with a badge.
They don't care about the arguments they present; it's literally just words to mock, confuse, and distract Black people.