We're done here.Why are you getting mad breh?
I posted the most credible English dictionary in the world.
Posting a NYTimes article is a joke. They credibility been a joke for awhile.
You are relying on a single definition that doesn't even touch on how discredited it is, not to mention that it didn't DISCOVER anything.
AT ALL.
EVER.
Even further, your definition doesn't even touch on whats wrong with eugenics or where it falls flat.
Even further, all you've done is quote the dictionary as if its the single fukking answer to how things are defined.
It takes sometimes DECADES for entries to be removed and updated.
Then when I post an article for you to read that talks about modern
Eugenics IS NOT A SCIENCE because it asserts that it leads to an epistemological and teleological (to an end) conclusion... Sciences don't do that.