Explain how Building 7 collapsed like a house of card.
Explain what happen to Flight 93 (Shanksville, Pa)
Explain why 1700 (probably uneducated
) architects and engineers are questioning the official story.
Due to the passengers revolting the hijackers decided to crash the plane into the ground. People make a big deal out of it being a field but if you look at the Google Earth satellite imagery it's mostly fields out there anyway. Not surprising. It hit the ground at a massive speed and fragmented in an extreme manner. The EPA has released photos showing just how much debris was excavated from the crater. An engine was found....various parts verified to have come from a commercial airliner. One of the GE phones the passengers no doubt called family members on was recovered from the crater.
Think about why a car crash is so dangerous if you are not wearing a seat belt. If you hit a tree at 65 miles per hour and nothing is securing you in place, you are still going 65 miles per hour at the moment of impact. Imagine that same concept when you hit the ground at 575 miles per hour. You really expecting a bunch of huge parts? And then there will be a picture posted of a plane crash that had circumstances that were entirely different and say it's proof that 93 was a drone/didn't crash or whatever.
Those architects and engineers are questioning this shyt so that they can exploit folks. The Twin Towers were mostly air.....I want you to stop and think about where those Towers were located....on a peninsula. I can guarantee you that a major concern for anyone wanting to build anything of substantial weight on Manhattan has to think about any and every way they can to keep their buildings as light as possible. The Towers were no different. Watch a documentary on it and the original architects point this out. It's not surprising the beams were weakened enough to cause a collapse. Notice the wording...they were weakened not melted to the point of nothing. Architects love to point out the beams couldn't have melted. You don't have to melt something in order for it to lose its strength. I'm amazed at all the people who are putting a little common sense to the curve so they can have a point. It's hilarious. Obviously trying to exploit.
I'll give you that Building 7 was odd but it's still obvious it sustained damage being in close vicinity to the Twin Towers and this definitely had a hand. I don't believe the official story regarding Building 7 was far from the mark personally. As far as old dude having insurance on the building....that's really surprising to some of ya'll?
But that doesn't make the planes holograms and it doesn't mean the passengers wanted to get away from their life and are living the life in the Bahamas.
Also when I say uneducated....I mean take the following as an example....
It is impossible for Hani Hanjour to have maneuvered his plane to crash into the Pentagon or keep his plane level at the speed the plane was traveling..
every time I ask someone who parrots this how much time they have spent in a simulator/airplane/class regarding aviation they say they haven't spent any time in either.
Hani Hanjour had a commercial pilot's license. The teacher who commented that he couldn't fly at all was commenting on the fact that he had trouble landing his plane. In the same interview he states that he believes Hani would have had no trouble doing what he did once the plane was airborne as the terrorist attacks didn't require landing the plane. That part always gets omitted for some reason.
You have pitch trim....autopilot...tools to assist with controlling speed....leveling the plane...this is the stuff that never gets discussed in the conspiracy theory videos.....I wonder why.