Lets Discuss What went wrong with Bernie Sanders' campaign ?

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State















https://www.washingtonpost.com/maga...r-policy-it-was-also-about-candidate-himself/


The Rise and Fall of Bernie Sanders: A Theory
Maybe his demise was less about ideology or policy — and more about the candidate himself
Rachel Manteuffel
March 23, 2020
Ari Rabin-Havt, a burly, bearded political operative, had been doing events with his boss for three years, since his boss was just 75 years old. But Bernie Sanders had never before asked for a chair. Sanders was as tired as Rabin-Havt had ever seen him, sitting in front of a banner bearing his name at a private fundraiser in a Middle Eastern restaurant in Las Vegas. Rabin-Havt cut the event short. He was a little alarmed, but political campaigns are exhausting, and it had been a long day, beginning early in Eastern Standard Time.

Jesse Cornett, the body man, was with them — his first day on the job. A body man is literally someone who takes care of the needs of the corpus of an important and busy person. It was his job to know how the candidate’s body was faring, but it was not his job to push.

In the car, Rabin-Havt asked if Sanders was okay. Sure, Sanders said. He’d just go to the hotel and lie down. He had a big day tomorrow. Then Rabin-Havt asked about dinner. Sanders said he was not hungry. He hadn’t eaten for hours and hours. Sanders should have been hungry. It could have been nothing, but two alarm bells had just rung for Rabin-Havt, and here came the third: Sanders said he was feeling a tightness in his chest.

Sometimes in high-pressure jobs, at the risk of irritating someone who is paying your salary, you have to substitute your judgment for theirs. Cornett and Rabin-Havt said it at the same time: They should go to an urgent-care clinic. And they did.

Faiz Shakir, Sanders’s campaign manager, got the call around 11:30 p.m. East Coast time. Shakir got the earliest flight out he could and spent his time in the air trying not to come to any conclusions based on information he didn’t have.

The first urgent care they visited, in a strip mall, turned them away, even after learning who the patient was. It was too late, and they were too busy. So Rabin-Havt remembered when he’d stayed at the MGM Grand Hotel and Casino, right on the Las Vegas Strip, that he’d stared out the window at an urgent-care sign. There’s no way around this: The place is called Elite Medical Center.

Sanders went in with the doctors, and Rabin-Havt sat in the waiting room with the senator’s wallet and a pile of paperwork. “There was never a catastrophic moment,” the deputy campaign manager stressed to me in February. The candidate never lost consciousness and never stopped being his irascible self.

Doctors told Rabin-Havt to take Sanders’s glasses away for safekeeping, but with this particular man, that issue proved to be a nonstarter. Eventually, the senator was taken to a nearby hospital. There, he got his artery blockage cleared, and when Rabin-Havt visited he was awake, around 1 in the morning.

Later that morning, “I went into the hospital room,” Shakir told me, “anticipating a tough conversation.” Sanders was sitting up, asking for updates on the campaign, energetic as ever and impatient to get back to work. “I was surprised,” Shakir says. “You know, Are you sure you’re okay? I think he got a little sick and tired of people asking if he was okay.” That is, within 12 hours of his heart attack, Sanders did not want to talk about his heart anymore.

Thus began one of the strangest political arcs in recent memory. Bernie Sanders — a notoriously grumpy Jewish socialist seeking the presidential nomination of a party he does not belong to and often disparages, whose lefty positions include politically tractionless ideas such as allowing convicted felons to vote from their prison cells, whose shlumpy posture emphatically lacks the parallel-to-the-wall bearing of the typical U.S. senator, who sounds like a sufferer of perpetual nasal congestion, who has had a child out of wedlock, who is older today than Ronald Reagan was when he left office already in some state of mental confusion — had a heart attack on Oct. 1. And it was then that his campaign really began to take off. Not only did the heart attack not deter any of his established fans, but more people than ever before began identifying themselves as supporters, and vastly more people opened their wallets.

He surged in the polls; he won the popular vote in Iowa, triumphed in New Hampshire, romped in Nevada. But it turned out there was one last surprise: Just as quickly as Sanders had become the front-runner, he seemed to stall — overrun in South Carolina and on Super Tuesday by a revived Joe Biden, whose own campaign had looked to be finished as recently as a few weeks ago.

How could things go so right and then so wrong in such quick, dramatic succession? Assuming Sanders’s downward trajectory continues, there will be, in the weeks to come, no shortage of autopsies performed on his campaign. Most will focus on the ideological dimension: Was Sanders too far left? Did Democratic voters turn out to be in a more centrist mood than we all thought? Those factors undoubtedly explain a lot, but to those explanations I want to add another theory of both his rapid rise and his sudden demise. It has to do with what Americans want — and don’t want — from their politicians. And Sanders’s heart attack turns out to be the perfect place to start.


WC66FXC7DUI6VMU3TW2C66ADU4.jpg
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and his wife, Jane, visit the Iowa State Fair in Des Moines in August. (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post)
EF7WMTSB7II6VGOHDX6UEQNC7Y.jpg
Supporters at a rally in January in Sioux City. (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post)


Before everything seemed to collapse for Sanders, I spent a lot of time trying to figure out what, back then, seemed like the central mystery of his campaign: In strictly political terms, why didn’t a heart attack kill him?

History, after all, is replete with examples of ill health seeming to damage presidential campaigns. Bob Dole, 73 and wounded in war, put his weight on an unsecured railing at a campaign event and fell off a stage, with indelible video of him lying on the ground and then getting helped up. Thomas Eagleton, after attaining the 1972 Democratic vice presidential nomination, confirmed news stories that he’d received electroshock therapy for depression, prompting George McGovern to ask him to leave the ticket. Hillary Clinton fainted, or didn’t faint, at a 9/11 memorial event in 2016, giving the Internet a chance to speculate about her health and fitness for office.

Politicians have always acted as if health mattered politically — and as if ill health was therefore something worth hiding. Richard Shenkman, a historian and the author of “Presidential Ambition: How the Presidents Gained Power, Kept Power, and Got Things Done, notes that once in office a president’s health becomes entwined with public confidence, which in practice means the public gets protected from knowing how perilous the situation might be. During Franklin D. Roosevelt’s fourth presidential campaign, to hide the extent to which polio had ravaged his body and to prove how robust he was, he rode in an open-car parade in the rain for hours, and risked getting much sicker. John F. Kennedy was devastatingly ill with Addison’s disease and was at times pumped full of painkillers and amphetamines to project youth and vigor. President Trump took an unplanned trip to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in November, but all the public knows is that the president tweeted his health was “very good (great!).”

Given this history, why had the heart attack not hurt Sanders politically? One possibility was that, after Trump, we simply don’t have dealbreakers in American politics anymore. It can be hard to remember as far back as 2015, but a lot of things used to disqualify someone from the presidency. For example, it used to be a big deal if a presidential candidate used a position of authority to burst into teenage beauty contestants’ dressing rooms when they thought they would have privacy. Or if he suggested committing war crimes to a frenzied, cheering crowd. Or if he declared bankruptcy to avoid paying money he had agreed to pay.

Not only has Trump personally obliterated many perceived obstacles to the presidency, he has lowered the bar in another way: If, as many Democrats said from the beginning, what was most important was to support the candidate most likely to beat Trump, then maybe everything else about the candidate had simply become less relevant. Did their policies make sense? Were they competent? Were they healthy enough to be president? It now seemed like Democrats cared only about what candidates did between the time they got in the race and November, not what the candidate might do starting in January 2021.

There was another possibility, too: Promising a revolution — as Sanders has done from the beginning — meant the details didn’t have to be crystallized. Even successful revolutions start in poetry but end in prose. The Founding Fathers declared independence and that all men are created equal in 1776, but it was 13 years and a war until anybody figured out how the government was going to work, and we’re still working on the equality part. So if a candidate said he was going to end gerrymandering and that worked for you, maybe you were going to just believe him when he said his heart was fine. Some people call this magical thinking. Others might call it hope.


Sanders reached out and took the mic before Ryan was finished. Ryan’s righteous intensity was a gift that Sanders didn’t seem to know how to accept.

IMADNRDIWMI6VGJDK4DTVXHCPQ.jpg
Sanders photographed through the red recording light of a TV camera. (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post)



It wasn’t merely, however, that Sanders’s campaign had survived his heart attack. It had actually seemed to do better in the weeks afterward. Shakir told me that over the 24 hours after the heart attack, before there was much reported at all about what happened or how the senator was doing, “We had a huge surge in volunteers making phone calls, volunteer donations to the campaign, surrogates going out and doing events for him. He was so excited to hear that the ‘Not me. Us.’ campaign was coming to fruition.” And when Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed him, which Sanders learned would happen while he was still in the hospital, she made it impossible to count him out.

His visible physical resilience and determination were, it seems, changing minds. George Sanders (no relation) — a 45-year-old organizer for the campaign whom I met in January at a Pennsylvania event called Organize Your Friends for Bernie — told me the heart attack was “a wake-up call” that Sanders might not be around forever. “We want change. We don’t want to miss it. Sometimes you need a catalyst. He’s the person to do that. Even if something happens to him, now’s the time to try this. It’s not just him, but he’s the best chance we might have for a while.”

But the theory that I found most intriguing was offered by Shenkman, the presidential historian. I’d asked him to explain how a negative health event might have helped a presidential campaign. “I was baffled by it myself,” he said. “It’s not exactly parallel to Reagan surviving an assassination. You didn’t see him in that heroic mode.” I pushed him to speculate. “People were fascinated by [the heart attack],” he said. “The fact that he suffered from it makes him into a human being. It really helps Bernie’s case because he readily confesses he’s not one of these backslapping politicians. It’s not his brand. He’s a little like a stick-figure cartoon, but a heart attack made him seem human.”




@wire28 @Th3G3ntleman @ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @humble forever @Dameon Farrow @Piff Perkins @Pressure @johnedwarduado @Armchair Militant @panopticon @Tres Leches @ADevilYouKhow @dtownreppin214



 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State
PART 2:


Shenkman was describing perhaps the core feature of Sanders’s campaign. Sanders adores talking about sweeping ideas — and has always seemed to loathe talking personally about himself. But if Shenkman was right, the candidate had, post-heart-attack, taken what would traditionally have been a weakness (lack of apparent interpersonal connection) and another weakness (a heart problem) and forged them into a strength. Because who has heart attacks? Not cartoon figures. Not ideologies. Human beings.

Indeed, there had been a vague idea that after the heart attack Sanders’s campaigning was kinder and gentler, that he was looser and more spontaneous and more able to connect with voters in a personal sense. “His return to the campaign trail,” observed reporter Ruby Cramer in a December BuzzFeed article, “ever since the heart attack, aka ‘heart incident,’ as senior aides refer to it in the press, has been a happy, bordering-on-joyous affair.” Maybe what voters wanted from Sanders, after all this time, was to be more personable, more relatable — more like a normal politician.


M4SJ3ZS3KMI6VDX5B6IEXXMAK4.jpg
Supporters at the St. James complex in Springfield, Va., in February. (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post)
LJ6MCRC7DYI6VMU3TW2C66ADU4.jpg
Sanders watches Super Tuesday results backstage at a rally in Essex Junction, Vt. (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post)

But how much of a change had Sanders really made? To what extent had he — the ultimate candidate of grand ideas, of revolution, of structural explanations for society’s problems — acquired a new human touch?

Consider what I witnessed in Grundy Center, Iowa, population 2,700, on a late afternoon in January. Approaching the small community center, I could hear Sanders speaking; the doors were open to accommodate an overflow crowd. Inside, the candidate was onstage. About 200 people sat in front of him, with 20 or so selected to sit behind him and hold signs.

Sanders addressed a war with Iran that looked possibly imminent. He thought war should be a last resort, and that sentiment got applause. He was a little red-faced and paced back and forth. He was in a nice blue sweater and dress pants, both impressively non-wrinkled considering his widely caricatured persona and his recent life on the road. He would wear the identical outfit for the next three days. Did he have several of them? Did he wield an iron late at night, in his hotel room? It’s part of the Bernie mystique.

In person, his hand gestures seemed exaggerated, his long arms pushing his long hands sideways, the palms out, fingers slightly curled, the whole hand flopping as though he were a marionette. The grandiloquent movements seemed a little retro — more befitting a Herbert Hoover-era stump speech shouted from the back of a railroad car, without microphones.

Sanders segued into his favorite topic, health care. He was explaining how he plans to pay for Medicare-for-all, and he was doing it using crowdsourcing. “How much are you paying a month in premiums?” he asked the room. An audience member answered.

“All right. Nine hundred bucks. For yourself? For your family? Two of you. All right. Nine hundred bucks iiiiiis” — he was doing ciphers in his head, kind of like a parlor trick; this is a man from before calculators — “almost $11,000 a year. Do you have any deductibles? Out-of-pocket expenses? Prescription drug costs?” He got the answers, did the math, coughed out the guy’s yearly health expenditures. He’s really into deductibles. His point was that under Medicare-for-all, you pay more taxes, but they are less than your current privately paid deductibles and premiums together. You’re banking more of your money because Uncle Sam has no profit motive to fleece you, the way for-profit companies do under the current unfair, unsustainable system.

A wiry, intense-looking middle-aged man stood up. His name was Ryan. He wore a tan newsboy hat and a plaid shirt with elbow patches over a Bernie T-shirt. Sanders had asked the audience for insurance premium payments, but Ryan ignored that. He started telling a story. “I just went to the emergency room this last Sunday feeling like I was gonna have a heart attack,” he said. Ryan is uninsured, with lingering student debt for both himself and his wife. He didn’t want to leave her with medical bills if he was going to die anyway, “so I begged and pleaded with the emergency room. I let them do the EKG thing” — he tapped his chest. Bernie nodded, flattened his lips, looked down. “I let them X-ray my lungs to make sure it wasn’t pneumonia,” Ryan said, “but then I told them I would walk out.” He felt he couldn’t afford any more tests.

As the tale was spooling out, Sanders looked at the man only intermittently, and only for seconds at a time. Mostly, he shot his glance around the room. He juggles numbers nimbly but isn’t, it seemed clear, quite sure what to do with emotions. It was perhaps the moment for a hug, but Bernie couldn’t quite go there. He extended his long arm to Ryan’s shoulder and simultaneously shook his hand, without getting any closer. Literally, this became an arm’s-length transaction.


Now Ryan was really twisting himself into a knot, comparing his experience at the hospital to his experiences as a poor kid in grade school, with a lunch card of a different color from everyone else’s. The rich kids, he said, made fun of him. He addressed the candidate with almost jarring intimacy.

When he told the hospital he had limited resources, he said, “they referred me to a free clinic. ... It’s humiliating, honestly, Bern. When coming home — I was driving a half an hour so that I didn’t have to have an ambulance — I called my wife, and I said, ‘You f---ing tell Bernie your husband died because he couldn’t afford to get fixed, because they don’t care if the poor drop, they don’t care. They don’t care.’ ”

Sanders was leaning away, his hands behind his back. He reached out and took the mic before Ryan was finished. “And we need you!” Ryan called after it, his big finale line lost to most of the room. Ryan’s righteous intensity was a gift that Sanders didn’t seem to know how to accept.

Candidates need these moments of empathy, to seem human. They tell stories about their struggles, their kids who make fun of them, their spouses who are smarter than they are. Biden’s family tragedies. Mayor Pete’s coming out to his parents. Elizabeth Warren’s being fired from her teaching job upon becoming pregnant.

This particular moment in Iowa was a moment for personal connection. It was a fine moment, in a presidential campaign, to mention that Sanders’s daughter-in-law died just weeks before at 46 from a cancer no one caught until it was too late to treat. That months ago, Sanders was making the same calculus that Ryan did about a possible heart attack. And that the candidate understands this sort of thing. And the candidate does understand. You cannot run this sort of empathy-based campaign and not understand. He just has a hard time showing it.

“Further discussion on premiums?” he asked the room. Someone piped up. It was a woman in the front row, her voice breaking and full of tears. She was not well enough to stand. She and her husband pay a thousand dollars a month, their deductible is $7,000, and he hadn’t had a raise in 20 years. “We can’t do this for much longer,” she said, faintly, tremulously, and through what sounded like physical pain.

“Did everybody hear the woman?” Sanders said. “I’m hearing $1,000 a month, that’s $12,000 a year, plus a $7,000 deductible. ...”

This didn’t seem to me like a looser and more personal campaign. But Faiz Shakir, when I pressed him for examples of Sanders’s new style of campaigning, told me the deductible game was new, since the heart attack. “He starts talking about the insanity of what the deductible is. He would say something like, if you feel like you have to pay $5,000 out of your pocket to go to the doctor, for many people, they are going to choose not to go to a doctor. And that maybe they get sicker.What had looked to me like a candidate avoiding all signs of empathy was, the way Shakir saw it, actually the kinder, gentler campaigner. But the result wasn’t a personal connection to Ryan. Sanders still wanted numbers, not feelings.

Sanders’s blue eyes were hard and chiding. I got the impression that if I uttered one more word, he was going to call my dad.

5EX7MGS5WQI6VLCQDBYB4FHANU.jpg
A supporter carries a portrait of the candidate at the Super Tuesday rally in Vermont. (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post)


In December the New York Times editorial board asked Sanders, “What are you likely to fail at or to do poorly as president?” Not the conventional “What is your biggest weakness?” but the much more interesting “What will be your obstacle?” He was both clear-eyed and unapologetic.

He’d fail, he said, to “talk to the New York Times.” And what he said next might have been to the same point, or it might have been a new one. “Look, I don’t tolerate bulls--- terribly well, and I come from a different background than a lot of other people who run the country. I’m not good at backslapping. I’m not good at pleasantries. If you have your birthday, I’m not going to call you up to congratulate you so you’ll love me and you’ll write nice things about me. That’s not what I do. Never have.”

What journalists want is a story: who you are and what made you this way. How you went from A to C. Instead, as Sanders explained, “I try to stay focused on the important issues facing working families in this country, and I fight for them.” Exactly what he did with Ryan, in other words. He stayed focused on what’s important — to him.

In the same interview with the Times, Sanders gave us an example of himself not tolerating the b-word:

NYT: Can you give us an example of one person who’s broken your heart?

BS: [after a long pause] What, on a personal level?

NYT: Yeah.

BS: No. I won’t. Even candidates for president of the United States have a limited amount of privacy.

If Super Tuesday was the end of Sanders’s shot at the presidency, he might have put his finger on why. The backslapping dealmaker Joe Biden, whom people like to work with, got the endorsements and the infrastructure of a whole political party of people who understand the value of remembering birthdays. Biden is in many ways the opposite of Sanders: a man who doesn’t do very well at all with big ideas but excels at the human aspect of politics. And it may simply be that for most voters, or at least many voters, the human aspect is the core of politics — especially in a time of crisis and fear.


I had tried to get an interview with Sanders through the campaign, or be granted the opportunity to shadow him. No luck. And yet, after Sanders’s Iowa swing was over and everyone was heading home, I wound up getting both, in a weird way. On the flight out of Iowa to a connecting flight in Chicago, I sat only a few feet behind him.

True to character, Sanders had carried his own luggage onto the plane and kept his head down at check-in. Unassumingly, he had boarded after the military. No body man in sight.

For both of us, the political opportunity here was actually better than a sit-down interview. It was potentially more authentic. Reporter and subject would be trapped together, breathing the same air at 30,000 feet. It wouldn’t even take any time out of his schedule. People want to know what the man is like. And anything he did and said in this familiar circumstance would instantly be more likable, more human, more believable than a Q&A or a debate. This would be his low-stakes chance to demonstrate some graciousness in a familiarly awkward situation. To show he’s the candidate you want to be stuck with on an airplane.

As soon as the fasten-seat-belts sign went off, I was crouching in the aisle with my notebook. “No,” he preempted, after the introduction but before the first question. “No. I am not doing press interviews now. I am sitting here reading” — he gestured to his tablet. It seemed to have text and a bar graph on it. “I am going home.”

One question, Senator? “No. Who are you?” he asked. “No. It’s inappropriate.” His blue eyes were hard and chiding. I got the impression that if I uttered one more word, he was going to call my dad. I slunk back to my seat, chastened, mystified.

But now maybe I get it. Just like with Ryan in Grundy Center, and just like with the New York Times editorial board, just like with every opportunity to show us his humanity, Bernie Sanders kept himself to himself. From his perspective, we already knew too much about his heart.









@wire28 @Th3G3ntleman @ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @humble forever @Dameon Farrow @Piff Perkins @Pressure @johnedwarduado @Armchair Militant @panopticon @Tres Leches @ADevilYouKhow @dtownreppin214
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State
Another example of Sanders utterly ignoring the black vote :wow: He had FIVE years.







h
ttps://twitter.com/AsteadWesley/status/1242829706099150848



https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...7b8b8e-685e-11ea-b313-df458622c2cc_story.html

Insiders recount how Sanders lost the black vote — and the nomination slipped away
Bernie Sanders reached the pinnacle of his campaign inside Cowboys Dancehall in San Antonio on Feb. 22. He pumped his fist to punctuate a triumphant speech. He’d just won the Nevada caucuses and was sitting on top of the Democratic presidential race.

But 1,200 miles away in South Carolina, some aides and allies felt dread that trouble was lurking just around the corner. “I knew that our campaign had not done the work it needed to do,” Donald Gilliard recalls thinking. He felt the campaign’s strategy was “geared toward white progressives,” leaving black voters behind.

Gilliard, the deputy state political director, wasn’t alone. Mal Hyman, a former congressional candidate and a Sanders surrogate in South Carolina, had a similar sense of anxiety. “We knew we were vulnerable,” he lamented.

A week later, their worst fears came true. A resurgent Joe Biden thumped Sanders by 28 points in the South Carolina primary, sending the Vermont senator into a free fall from which he has not recovered.

The loss underlined one of the fundamental failings of the Sanders campaign: He was unable to win the trust of African American voters. As the 78-year-old democratic socialist considers how long to continue his historic campaign, his disconnect from black voters threatens to sharply limit his influence in a party that is soon expected to belong to Biden.

Now some who worked on the front lines of his campaign, including black staffers and surrogates, are speaking out about what they believe was a negligent strategy that underestimated the significance of the first primary with a majority-black electorate — a blueprint they said they tried and failed to redirect, and one that ultimately put the campaign on a devastating trajectory.

Sanders sees the United States through the prism of class, but the 2020 primary has in some ways reaffirmed that for many Americans, the racial divide is more urgent. The senator built a coalition of millennials, working-class whites and Latinos, wagering that a strong showing in the first three states — none of which has many black voters — would power him through South Carolina and beyond.

As a result, many African Americans felt disconnected from him. “I think the distinguishing attitude for Sanders, that you didn’t see associated with Biden, was an angry white man,” said Ivory Thigpen, a state representative who served as co-chair for Sanders in South Carolina and believes strongly in his message. “In the African American culture,” he said, “nonverbal communication and body language is huge.”

Conveying a personal touch was never Sanders’s strength, Thigpen added. But he added, “I think being accessible would have made up for it.”

Sanders campaign officials defend their efforts, saying the complaints of their South Carolina operatives do not reflect the tough choices the campaign faced nationally or the challenge of dislodging black voters’ long-standing loyalty to Biden — which was only strengthened by a last-minute endorsement from influential Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.).

“This campaign nurtured and put African Americans in the pipeline of a presidential campaign,” said Nina Turner, a national co-chair of the Sanders campaign. Turner, who is black, attributed the complaints to state officials who had “the luxury to only be singularly focused,” while she, Sanders and other top campaign officials “had to focus on the nation.”

The campaign had other big problems, according to current and former officials and allies. The team was caught flat-footed by how quickly the Democratic Party establishment united behind Biden, after the campaign executed a plan that rested heavily on a divided opposition. Sanders has a tendency to micromanage, some said, slowing big decisions. And aides’ efforts to get him to criticize Biden more directly fell short.

But the moment that many keep replaying in their minds is the painful defeat in the Palmetto State. It came just a week after Sanders had become the undisputed primary leader with his decisive win Nevada, following strong showings in Iowa and New Hampshire.

“If we’d been a little bit closer in South Carolina, we would have the momentum instead of Biden going into Super Tuesday,” said Raymond Corley, who served as political director for the Sanders campaign in South Carolina. Black voters in the state backed Biden over Sanders by a margin of 61 percent to 17 percent, according to network exit polls — a yawning gap that was largely repeated in other primaries.

Sanders, an irascible Northeastern liberal, was never a natural fit with many black voters, particularly older ones in Southern states with more-conservative leanings. But several staffers said the disconnection did not have to be this bad.

Turner, a former Ohio state legislator and Sanders’s most visible African American ally, traveled with Sanders, introduced him at rallies and helped shape the campaign’s outreach to black voters — including keeping an eye on South Carolina.

Some staffers felt she was wrong for that role. “She didn't know the state,” said Gilliard, who said he is fond of Sanders but parted ways with the campaign after the Feb. 29 primary.

Turner said the campaign relied heavily on local talent, including Gilliard. “I have a keen understanding of the black community,” she said. “The overwhelming majority of [South Carolina staffers], including him, understood the state. And he was hired to do a job.”


But the chain of command was murky, according to some staffers and surrogates. Thigpen recalled telling Turner privately that campaign officials discussed things that didn’t end up happening, and he often felt like he was “going to customer service and saying, ‘Hey, I want this done.’ ”

Others who worked in the state said some of the campaign’s decisions amounted to political malpractice. They faulted national campaign officials for deploying what they viewed as unseasoned strategists; not advertising more aggressively on television and black radio; and missing opportunities to bring Sanders in for face time with black leaders and voters.

Even more basic needs such as yard signs became a source of angst, they said, citing a stark shortage in a state where visibility is a big part of the political culture.

“Inexperienced state leadership,” said Hyman, who gave speeches for Sanders, “was very slow to respond and to take any risk or broaden our base or to push for some of the what we thought were common-sense suggestions.”

One idea, for example, was for Sanders to visit with a convention of Baptist ministers, according to Gilliard and Thigpen, who said that plan was rejected by higher-ups. Jessica Bright, who served as state director, said the decision was “more of a scheduling conflict. It wasn’t anything outside that realm.”

But for people in South Carolina, Sanders’s priorities clearly appeared to be elsewhere. The campaign didn’t start advertising heavily on radio in the state until late January and on television in mid-February, according to data from Advertising Analytics, even though the primary was Feb. 29.


It was no secret inside the campaign that the South Carolina operation was troubled.

Turner and another senior adviser, Chuck Rocha, traveled to the state to address personnel turmoil last summer, according to people with knowledge of the situation. In November, the campaign parted ways with then-state director Kwadjo Campbell, replacing him with Bright, who had been his deputy. Marvin Hayes, an operative from Ohio, was brought in as a senior adviser the previous month.

Just before he departed, Campbell sent an explosive memo to Sanders, Turner, campaign manager Faiz Shakir and other top officials excoriating their decisions, according to people with knowledge of the communication.

“I have not been able to do my job of building a base in the African-American community because of interference from National on a number of critical strategic decisions that have impeded our ability to gain traction among this key demographic needed for victory,” Campbell wrote.

He accused the campaign brass of preventing him from partnering with local African American candidates and of interfering with personnel moves.

Turner said that some of what Campbell suggested wasn’t even legal. “Some of the partnerships that he proposed did not comport with campaign finance laws,” she said, adding that many of his other ideas were “carried forward.” Campbell initially declined to comment. After publication of this story, he said it was “not illegal to have our volunteers team up” with volunteers from local campaigns.

In a joint telephone interview, Bright, Hayes and Michael Wukela, who was communications director in South Carolina, strongly disputed the notion that the campaign had not vigorously contested the state. Arguing that they had a more intense operation than Biden, they said that Sanders attended more than 70 events there, hired a field staff that was mostly people of color, and that the campaign knocked on the equivalent of a door a minute.

“I would say, without fear of contradiction, we had the best campaign operation and field operation in the state of South Carolina,” Hayes said. He suggested that Sanders’s poor performance was due to voters’ belief that Biden was more electable against President Trump.

“There was a lot of energy and attention being paid to the defeat of Donald Trump,” Hayes said, while “the important part of Senator Sanders’s message was about what is affecting people’s lives on a day-to-day basis.” On one visit to Denmark, S.C., for example, Sanders held small events on the subject of water contamination.


Few dispute that the South Carolina primary was the turning point in the primary campaign. In the following 72 hours, two of Biden’s rivals endorsed him, and a raft of Democratic officials jumped on board. Three days later, Biden swept most of the Super Tuesday races, including other Southern states with large black populations.

It was only after those humbling defeats that the campaign finally appeared to rethink its approach to black voters. Phillip Agnew, a well-known African American activist and campaign surrogate, was named a senior adviser. Turner and another official worked the phones for hours to secure an endorsement from civil rights icon Jesse Jackson.

But by that point, Sanders had little room to maneuver. He canceled a planned visit to a civil rights museum in Mississippi to campaign in Michigan, and then scrapped plans for a speech on racial justice. When a reporter questioned Sanders on his decision to skip a commemoration of “Bloody Sunday” in Alabama, he was curt, snapping that he was in California drawing a big crowd.


Sanders also paid a price for his reluctance to speak publicly about his role in the civil rights movement, some allies felt, despite having an impressive story to tell about impassioned activism that included an arrest at a 1963 protest.

In the eyes of some Sanders aides, there was little he could have done to reverse the loyalty that Biden spent decades building among black voters. Others felt that the campaign misjudged how impactful Biden’s institutional support would be. At the same time, a wipeout of nearly 30 points was hardly inevitable, some said.

“It kind of seems like an underestimation,” Thigpen said. “Not only of how important the African American vote was, but how much it was going to be a bellwether and an indicator to other African American populations in other states.”



@wire28 @Th3G3ntleman @ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @humble forever @Dameon Farrow @Piff Perkins @Pressure @johnedwarduado @Armchair Militant @panopticon @Tres Leches @ADevilYouKhow @dtownreppin214
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State





AOC breaks with Bernie on how to lead the left

AOC breaks with Bernie on how to lead the left
The congresswoman is declining to back primary challengers following in her footsteps — and working within the system in Congress.

90

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. | Samuel Corum/Getty Images

By ALEX THOMPSON and HOLLY OTTERBEIN

03/30/2020 04:30 AM EDT
Soon after her upset primary victory against a Democratic Party boss in 2018, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez traveled to St. Louis to prove her victory wasn't a one-off by campaigning for Cori Bush, who was similarly taking on a longtime Democratic congressman.

“What I’m asking for you to do is to support my sister, Cori Bush,” Ocasio-Cortez said at a rally. “It is so important what we did, we just came off of this win in New York, but people were trying to say, ‘It’s just one place.’”

Bush lost that race but is challenging Rep. William "Lacy" Clay again in an August primary. She has more money and higher name recognition, and earned the endorsement of Bernie Sanders. But Ocasio-Cortez isn’t helping Bush this time.

After her victory in 2018, Ocasio-Cortez encouraged progressives to follow in her footsteps and run for Congress with the backing of the left-wing group Justice Democrats, even if it meant taking on powerful incumbents. Sixteen months later, the Missouri primary isn’t the only one Ocasio-Cortez is steering clear of.

200108-aoc-sanders-gty-773.jpg

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Of the half-dozen incumbent primary challengers Justice Democrats is backing this cycle, Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed just two. Neither was a particularly risky move: Both candidates — Jessica Cisneros in Texas and Marie Newman in Illinois — were taking on conservative Democrats who oppose abortion rights and later earned the support of several prominent national Democrats.

Ocasio-Cortez’s reluctance marks a break with the outsider tactics of the activist left, represented by groups like Justice Democrats. This election cycle, the organization is trying to boot not just conservative Democrats but also some liberal Democrats and to replace them with members who are more left-wing. In other words, to replicate what it pulled off against Rep. Joe Crowley in 2018 by recruiting Ocasio-Cortez.

Ocasio-Cortez’s shift coincides with turnover among top aides in her congressional office — replacing some outspoken radicals with more traditional political professionals — along with a broader reckoning on the left on how to expand Sanders’ coalition after his failure to significantly do so in the presidential primary. Some progressives have questioned whether Sanders should have softened his anti-establishment rhetoric and tried to build bridges with mainstream Democrats who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 rather than betting big on turning out disaffected and first-time voters.

Ocasio-Cortez’s endorsement moves are not a fluke but part of a larger change over the past several months. After her disruptive, burn-it-down early months in Congress, Ocasio-Cortez, who colleagues say is often conflict-averse in person, has increasingly been trying to work more within the system. She is building coalitions with fellow Democratic members and picking her fights more selectively.

The changes have divided her supporters, with some lamenting she's been co-opted in short order by the system — and others asserting she's offering the left a more viable path toward sustained power.

Gone are her plans for a “corporate-free” caucus, modeled on the uncompromising tactics of the conservative Freedom Caucus. The goal then was to force leadership's hand to go further left.

After starting some high-profile fights with Speaker Nancy Pelosi and tweaking Democratic colleagues on Twitter early in her tenure, Ocasio-Cortez has been more conciliatory toward other House Democrats. In February, she dubbed Pelosi the “mama bear of the Democratic Party.”


“The Democratic Party is the party of coalitions, not a cult."

James Carville, a top strategist for Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign

Over the past few weeks, Ocasio-Cortez has also chided Sanders supporters for online harassment and delivered soft critiques of Sanders and some of his allies for being too “conflict-based.” The moves have drawn surprise praise from some moderate and veteran Democrats.

“The Democratic Party is the party of coalitions, not a cult,” said James Carville, a top strategist for Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign and vocal critic of Sanders during the primary. “I’ve observed her. I think she’s really talented, that she’s really smart. Maybe she is — I don’t speak for her — coming to the conclusion that she wants to be part of the coalition.”

Neera Tanden, president of the liberal think tank Center for American Progress and a longtime Hillary Clinton aide, called Ocasio-Cortez's shift "a sign of leadership."

"There are some people on the left who thought that their views represented a strong majority, and the primary process has shown that voters diverged, that Sanders is winning a minority and smaller minority than he had four years ago,” Tanden said.

Instead of supporting Justice Democrats' full slate of incumbent challengers, Ocasio-Cortez launched her own PAC earlier this year that's been more focused on electing progressives in Republican-held or open seats. Ocasio-Cortez declined to be interviewed, but her new communications director, Lauren Hitt, noted that Bush’s August 4 primary is still several months away and that the congresswoman is monitoring other primaries.

"We don’t usually endorse so far out," Hitt said. Ocasio-Cortez, however, endorsed Newman six months before her primary and backed Cisneros more than four months before hers.

Of course, it's easier to endorse a primary challenger as an outsider than as an incumbent working with the people she'd be trying to remove. Some of the campaigns for incumbent challengers said they understood that dynamic but still hoped that things might be different.

Bush’s campaign manager, Isra Allison, told POLITICO that despite the lack of an endorsement this time, “We support AOC and the work she’s done and the attention she’s brought to these important issues. Our opinions on that trump any of her recent decision-making.”

“It’s understood that she’s in a precarious position endorsing incumbent challengers at all being in Congress,” said Brandon Sharp, a senior adviser for Morgan Harper, a Justice Democrats-backed candidate challenging Rep. Joyce Beatty in Ohio. That primary was scheduled for earlier this month but was delayed by the spread of the novel coronavirus. Sharp added that the campaign hasn't formally asked for an endorsement.

Justice Democrats aides said Ocasio-Cortez remains the most anti-establishment Democrat in Congress. They pointed to fundraising and advocacy work she has already done for Cisneros and Newman. Cisneros lost her race, while Newman won.

“I can’t think of an elected politician who’s doing more to support primary challengers and a new generation of progressive leadership in the Democratic Party than her,” said the group’s spokesperson, Waleed Shahid.


Still, some left-wing supporters have been less enamored with Ocasio-Cortez’s evolution. Many were reluctant to speak publicly, however, given her stature and the fact that Sanders’ expected loss makes her a likely heir to his movement.

The changes go beyond rhetoric and include personnel. Two of her most senior aides who worked on her insurgent campaign have left her operation — chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti, who co-founded Justice Democrats, left in August, and communications director Corbin Trent left her team earlier this month.

Some associates of Ocasio-Cortez thought Trent was hurting her by calling for tactics they felt were politically foolhardy. One ally recalled Trent wanted Ocasio-Cortez to go beyond "Medicare for All" and embrace a fully nationalized health care system like the United Kingdom’s, in an attempt to further stretch the boundaries of the debate.

Trent’s defenders in the progressive world believe his willingness to make enemies and indifference to what Pelosi thought helped push ideas like the Green New Deal into the mainstream.

Trent, who is working on Sanders' presidential campaign, declined to comment.

The hiring of Hitt as Trent's replacement speaks to Ocasio-Cortez’s new approach. An experienced operative, Hitt has worked for more moderate Democrats like Gov. John Hickenlooper and Rep. Beto O’Rourke during their recent presidential bids as well as left-wing candidates such as former New York gubernatorial contender Cynthia Nixon.

Hitt said in a statement that “there's a lot of staff from the campaign that has stayed — including her deputy district director, her policy director on the campaign, and her field director on the campaign — as well as several junior members of staff."

Chakrabarti was a firebrand on the Hill. After Ocasio-Cortez's victory in November 2018, he earned enemies in the Democratic Caucus by declaring “we gotta primary folks.” They were livid in June when he called some members “new Southern Democrats.”

Ocasio-Cortez replaced him with legislative director Ariel Eckblad, who joined her office in January 2019 after working for Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.).

Chakrabarti praised Ocasio-Cortez and her approach. “It’s hard to think of anyone who’s had more impact than her in their first year as a congressperson,” he told POLITICO.

Other progressives said Ocasio-Cortez’s more accommodating stance is a smart long-term strategy for a movement looking for a path forward. “She’s speaking in a way to create a majority in a way that Bernie is not interested in doing,” said Max Berger, the former director of progressive outreach on Elizabeth Warren’s campaign who also worked for Justice Democrats.

“If Bernie is Moses, then AOC is Joshua,” Berger added, referring to the biblical prophets.



“She’s speaking in a way to create a majority in a way that Bernie is not interested in doing."

Max Berger, the former director of progressive outreach on Elizabeth Warren’s campaign

Sean McElwee, co-founder of the progressive group Data for Progress, which collaborated with Justice Democrats in 2018 during Ocasio-Cortez’s primary campaign, agreed that her new approach is savvier.

“AOC gets to Congress and is like, ‘[Wow], there are a lot of people who agree with me,” he said. McElwee added that “she does have these big ideological goals,” but also wants to address immediate issues important to her constituents like ensuring the census materials are bilingual. “AOC is, I think, a very famous person but fundamentally a quite normal representative," he said.

Some left-wing activists believe that criticism of Ocasio-Cortez may be misplaced, more about people wanting her to be something she’s not.

“Bernie is the first leftist politician who has received a national platform in a long time in this country, and so some people say that every leftist politician has got to be like Bernie,” Shahid said. “But AOC is a different person with a different set of life experiences. So how she leads will be different. I don’t think it’s a difference in ideology — it may be a difference in approach.”

Heather Caygle contributed to this report.



@wire28 @Th3G3ntleman @ezrathegreat @Jello Biafra @humble forever @Dameon Farrow @Piff Perkins @Pressure @johnedwarduado @Armchair Militant @panopticon @Tres Leches @ADevilYouKhow @dtownreppin214

 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,263
Reputation
7,002
Daps
147,097
Reppin
CookoutGang

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,590
Moderates: let’s unite under one candidate and beat trump. Done in 2 days

Progressives: let’s push forward a progressive agenda together. Continuously start back stabbing each other.

progressives: why aren’t we winning :why:. Why does Liz refuse to support Bernie


:mjlol:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State


AOC Isn't 'Breaking' With Bernie, She's Evolving Beyond Him—as Progressive Politics Must
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has natural political chops that it's dangerous to underestimate.
By Charles P. Pierce
Mar 30, 2020

aoc-1585591578.jpg

Joe RaedleGetty Images

In the realm of ordinary politics in extraordinary times, this Politico story about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is causing no little buzz in and around the Intertoobz. Ever since she backed Nancy Pelosi for the speakership in the newly elected Democratic-majority House of Representatives, I’ve been telling people that she has natural political chops that it's dangerous to underestimate. (Among the members of the Squad, AOC is second only to Ayanna Pressley in this regard.) Now, of course, some of the performative Left have their purity in a knot because she’s demonstrating this again.

The piece frames this as AOC vs. Bernie Sanders, which is unfortunate, and it begins with an anecdote from the wrong campaign in 2018. The real mistake AOC made was opposing Sharice Davids’s campaign in Kansas. She and Sanders lined up behind Brent Welder, a former Sanders staffer, against a gay Native American woman running on a shoestring. One of AOC’s major political talents is that she learns from mistakes and never makes the same one again.

Of the half-dozen incumbent primary challengers Justice Democrats is backing this cycle, Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed just two. Neither was a particularly risky move: Both candidates — Jessica Cisneros in Texas and Marie Newman in Illinois — were taking on conservative Democrats who oppose abortion rights and later earned the support of several prominent national Democrats.Ocasio-Cortez’s reluctance marks a break with the outsider tactics of the activist left, represented by groups like Justice Democrats. This election cycle, the organization is trying to boot not just conservative Democrats but also some liberal Democrats and to replace them with members who are more left-wing. In other words, to replicate what it pulled off against Rep. Joe Crowley in 2018 by recruiting Ocasio-Cortez.

Framing this as AOC “breaking” with Sanders is an easy narrative trope on which to hang a story, but it slights AOC’s time in Congress itself. For a rookie who not long ago was taking drink orders, AOC has proven herself to be an aggressive and informed questioner in committee hearings. (I hear mixed things about her constituent service, and the wingnut press has been beating its little tin drums about it, but I also hear that it’s gotten better.) And it also elides the fact that, when Sanders was hospitalized with a heart attack, AOC pretty much became the Sanders campaign, and it can be argued that she rescued it completely. She isn’t “breaking” with Bernie. She’s evolving beyond him, as progressive politics must. Her first re-election is critical to this process. For right now, she’s far more interesting than her detractors, left or right, let on.

Respond to this post on the Esquire Politics Facebook page here.

Charles P. Pierce Charles P Pierce is the author of four books, most recently Idiot America, and has been a working journalist since 1976.
 
Top