No, it wasn't. do I agree with the word war being used in reference to the build up of arms/armament race? Hell no.
so again, OP reaching dumb hard and "race war" is just some click bait shyt.
if you think we're in a race way right now then allow me to ask you this,
What are you actively doing to train so you can defend yourself?
Argue with me on the meaning of the word War?
lol. stop it, you dude's don't believe this shyt y'all speaking because if y'all truly did that would only leave 2 options for you guys
Option A. You're training and fighting
Option B. You're on the net, faking the funk
Stop it 5
your suggestion that one must be actively involved to be in a war otherwise there is no war, is fallacious. It's like asking a non-combatant civilian the exact same question during world war one, and then reaching a conclusion based on her answer when there's a war going on in spite of her answer.
Idiot: "sir, If there's a war going on, you're either fighting or training, or you're just saying there's a war"
*actual people dying as a result of war*
person: "well I'm not fighting or training, therefore I must be just saying there's a war when in actuality there is none"
faulty logic, lazy fallacy.
What am I doing to train or defend myself? minimizing contact with the people who may want to kill me, and being prepared to die every time I encounter them. I don't own weapons so in the event I am in an altercation, if I lose at hand to hand combat and am killed, that's game over.
we're at war in spite of your very limited understanding of the term, in spite of me arguing with you over the definition, this interaction means very little in the grand scheme of things when Black people are being killed, imprisoned and separated from there families, and there families having to turn to the very people who imprisoned and killed them for food and shelter, that's war, and you're too ignorant to know you're right in the middle of it because "semantics".