They have NO respect for this bytch ass nikka
We held them to 85 points and Rob had the highest +/- in the game. They were a top defense with that lineup last year. It's a proven formula for the C'sIt's really gonna be a "because it worked" type of thing, but that was a huge gamble that looked bad more than it looked good at time progressed imo. 6ers didn't have an answer for most of the 1st but once 76ers started attacking from the corners, that strategy looked bad IMO
Unfortunately, Doc swapped Niang out for PJ in the 4th, who couldn't keep it up, and Melton just couldn't make shots.
Tl;dr shyt wasn't as an easy a decision for Muzz as they're saying it was
They was up 15-3 or so before the 6ers showed any pulse, and they won the game by 9, so I don't think changing it up was a bad idea or anything. It's just one of those things that statistically is going to look like it was a no brainer, but while watching the game, I could see why Muzz didn't do it (primarily after the first quarter). You get the version of Philly that was knocking down everything open and give them the defensive style that was played today and its a 20 point L.We held them to 85 points and Rob had the highest +/- in the game. They were a top defense with that lineup last year. It's a proven formula for the C's
We held them to 85 points and Rob had the highest +/- in the game. They were a top defense with that lineup last year. It's a proven formula for the C's