MVike28
right around the ACC
he's a mental midget.So we're just ignoring all context here? Just ignoring everything but the result?
nikka really broke down every series into 3 or 4 words
Holy shyt the hot takes are on FIRE
he's a mental midget.So we're just ignoring all context here? Just ignoring everything but the result?
he's a mental midget.
nikka really broke down every series into 3 or 4 words
Holy shyt the hot takes are on FIRE
So it's cool to give the "best player in the league" cause his team wasn't the best
Who's talking about excuses?
I'm no LeBron stan, but the Warriors will probably win and if they do it's because they're the better team not because of what LeBron does or doesn't do.
This site didn't exist when the Bills were losing 4 straight.
And there aren't many players that demand the attention of LBJ for this to even be a discussion.
You're acting as if Wilt, Jerry West and Jim Kelly are current topics in sports.
I don't think you realize that basketball is a team sport.i'm not ignoring anything just stating what's truth.
This a thousand times. The media by and large, and especially this site won't be giving any credit to whoever wins. It'll just be "LeBron/Curry choked it away" with complete disregard for what actually happens over the course of the series, same as last yearAll the people saying they expect LeBron to win this year will be calling Steph a choker if it happens...
I don't think you realize that basketball is a team sport.
This a thousand times. The media by and large, and especially this site won't be giving any credit to whoever wins. It'll just be "LeBron/Curry choked it away" with complete disregard for what actually happens over the course of the series, same as last year
That would be obvious, now wouldn't it?
Anybody that wins a series between 2 healthy teams is obviously the better team...come on breh
You cant say the Cavs ARENT better than the Warriors if the Cavs beat a healthy Warriors team in the NBA Finals....and that's why I say get them odds outta here
NOBODY has ever used whether ANY player was the underdog or not to justify losses. Not Kobe stans, Duncan stans, Shaq stans, McGrady stans, Iverson stans, Carmelo stans, Curry stans, Durant stans, etc
The only reason this is being used now is a pre-prepared tool for LeBron and it's weak.
Let him play and either win or lose. But dont go bringing up betting odds to justify someone losing again
Give Dirk props tho, we cant say they didnt earn that. He played outta his mind. People forget that Mavs squad swept the defending champs Lakers.
@Newzz 's straight up crusade against lebron lately. he's trying so hard...putting in that vintage kobe stan effort.
Also can't ignore that Lebron had some horrible turnovers late in that game and some bad misses to the point poeple were talking about Lebron choked the game away at the end before that miracle comeback. With that said it is crazy to try not to give Lebron credit for that title. Every great has had someone else hit some big shots in clutch situations.But that's bullshyt and we all know it. Lebron was amazing for most of that 4th quarter but people act like he was stinking up the joint and owes that ring to Ray.
What were the exact odds though. Big difference between being +105 underdog compared to a +300 underdog. The +105 is considered basically playing an equal team while the latter is a true underdog.It's not about the odds . Just look at it as he's had the worst team. You can throw the odds out and just look at the squads on the court