LeBron is a fraud. 9-24 from the field. 2-12 from 3. blocked by Pat Bev on game tying 3

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,231
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,088
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
It fuels me
full

:skip:

ALL BAD
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,231
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,088
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
None of them did it. I'm not playing that game. Too big, too fast, too strong. Miami LeBron washes 2012 and 2013 Kobe.

KOBE FAR MORE SKILLED, STRONGER BETWEEN THE EARS, AND DEPENDABLE IN THE CLUTCH

LETS KEEP IT A BUCK, EVEN ROOKIE KOBE BEATS 2011 MAVS WIT WADE N BOSH
 

PaperEnterprise

It's the inner strength..
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
7,253
Reputation
1,830
Daps
22,106
Reppin
New York
I wonder if Lakers win the chip this year

Will the people who hate lebron but are laker fans, celebrate the championship or will they put an asterisk next to the ring.

If the lakers win*
 

360Waves

2 girls and they get along like I'm Lou Will
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Messages
4,492
Reputation
-1,504
Daps
30,687
Reppin
NYC
So Kyrie didn't hit the game winner and didn't bail out Lebron because of the block but Artest bailed out Kobe despite the fact that Lakers were already up. :comeon:

The Iggy block didn't set up the shyt for Kyrie. That was a pnr iso play specifically for Kyrie in the half set. That wasn't a transition shot. Even if Iggy made the layup and the block never happened, your thought process brought you to the conclusion that Kyrie doesn't take a 3 that he HAS to win the game when we saw him take a 3 that he didn't? :mjlol:They'd be up 2 if Iggy made it so his 3 is still a game winner. Nothing about who Kyrie is says he doesn't take that 3 in iso if they are down 2. The odds go up that he takes that 3 than the one he took when it was tied.

Again, since you're slow on the uptake, if Kyrie's game winner and Rays game winner isn't a bailout when they don't win the game if they don't make it. Then there is no way Artest hitting a 3 when the Lakers were already up 3 can count as a bailout either. All that other shyt you talking is conjecture.

Every major FG in the 4th was made by someone not named Kobe but no player on EITHER team made more than 2 FGs and most only made 1 so you say that like it's supposed to mean something when Kobe was still the scoring leader in the 4th for both teams because he kept attacking despite the bad shooting and getting to the line.

And now you upset cause you can't call people names without someone pointing out that you can't do shyt but that. Then you start crying about being threatened and you wanna call someone else a bytch and a fakkit. You a stain nikka. Straight victim.
:mjlol:
In any game but especially G7 of the Finals there's a dramatic difference in the amount of pressure behind taking a 3 when you're down versus when you're tied. Not saying Kyrie wouldn't have taken the three regardless, but it's much easier to take that shot knowing you have the security blanket of a tie. The block was arguably more important than the actual 3.

And again, you are not slick. The original argument was that "BOTH Pau and MWP bailed Kobe out" in Game 7. You're trying to reduce it down to just the MWP three in the fourth so you can argue that "they were already up" when he hit it. Not only was that NOT the original argument but they were only up 3 points when MWP hit his shot. You're acting like his 3 was some inconsequential jumper that happened up 15 in the 2nd quarter. :dead: And the only reason the Lakers were even up 3 is because Pau went on a 6 point scoring run by himself prior to the MWP shot. The MWP shot happened with about a minute left in the game and gave LA a 6 point lead, which created a lead that was basically insurmountable due to how hard it was to score in that game.

The Lakers started the 4th down and it was Metta World Peace And 1 that tied the game at 61, followed by a Derrick Fisher 3 to tie it again at 64. From the 5 minute mark till the end of the game it was basically all Pau and MWP. After MWP's 3, Ray Allen hits a 3 to chop the Laker lead back down to 3. Then Kobe BRICKED a 3 that woulda gave the Celtics the opportunity to possibly tie the game up, except unsung hero Pau Gasol rebounded Kobe's brick and fed it to him again, where he was fouled for FTs and the game was sealed.

What you're failing to understand is that clutch isn't always about making the obvious basket to win the game. It's about making the momentum swinging plays. Ray's shot is NOTHING without LeBron's three the possession prior. They aren't even in a position tie the game. And what often goes forgotten is the Spurs had 5 seconds left to win and LeBron had a stop on Tony Parker (who was hot that stretch) to send it to OT. In 2016, is Kyrie's level of confidence the same knowing the Cavs are down? Do they even draw up a Kyrie three to begin with knowing they're down? In that G7, Kobe is not responsible for ANY of the momentum swinging plays. No crucial rebounds, no key blocks, no key steals, and definitely no timely baskets. :umad:
 
Top