So Kyrie didn't hit the game winner and didn't bail out Lebron because of the block but Artest bailed out Kobe despite the fact that Lakers were already up.
The Iggy block didn't set up the shyt for Kyrie. That was a pnr iso play specifically for Kyrie in the half set. That wasn't a transition shot. Even if Iggy made the layup and the block never happened, your thought process brought you to the conclusion that Kyrie doesn't take a 3 that he HAS to win the game when we saw him take a 3 that he didn't?
They'd be up 2 if Iggy made it so his 3 is still a game winner. Nothing about who Kyrie is says he doesn't take that 3 in iso if they are down 2. The odds go up that he takes that 3 than the one he took when it was tied.
Again, since you're slow on the uptake, if Kyrie's game winner and Rays game winner isn't a bailout when they don't win the game if they don't make it. Then there is no way Artest hitting a 3 when the Lakers were already up 3 can count as a bailout either. All that other shyt you talking is conjecture.
Every major FG in the 4th was made by someone not named Kobe but no player on EITHER team made more than 2 FGs and most only made 1 so you say that like it's supposed to mean something when Kobe was still the scoring leader in the 4th for both teams because he kept attacking despite the bad shooting and getting to the line.
And now you upset cause you can't call people names without someone pointing out that you can't do shyt but that. Then you start crying about being threatened and you wanna call someone else a bytch and a fakkit. You a stain nikka. Straight victim.