On the surface, this is a good point. My only response would require me to speculate on Fiz's intentions. My feeling is "eat what you kill" refers to what you actually do IN GAME. I get the feeling that Fiz, until the 25 game mark, is making game day roster decisions based on a host of variables that we, on the outside, can't understand, but players like Dotson seems to understand and respond to well
Again, on the surface, I agree w/ you but when you look at the unavoidable variables such as foul trouble & matchups, if you want your foul happy projects to get more meaningful minutes, they may not be best starting and should have those minutes later in the games. Clearly, we have Robinson & Vonleh who are the only players who can step into the center role. If your coach, how do you best allow a situation for Robinson to grow w/o him seeing most of his minutes in the first half of the first quarter b/c of quick foul trouble? You also need to remember that development is not just let the kids play. It's about our developing PG needs to have players he can pass to that are the most capable of making a shot. Our developing 2s like Trier & Dotson are trending toward being the 3rd or 4th focus of the defense so they may need to be out there and seeing how they can excel w/ the defense focusing on a Kanter & Timmy for example. It seems as if Fiz gives the kids opportunities to try on different hats b/c he and the team need to help them on a trajectory to the most efficient use of their potential. As stated, our developing center, Mitch, needs to see what the 3rd & 4th quarters feel like. He's not getting that chance if he has 4 fouls before the 2nd. Our developing forward, Knox, needs to understand that he was not doing well at all w/ the opportunities given. Has Hezonja gained minutes advantage over him? Yes; b/c our potential future star has to understand that if his effort is trash & a trash player like Hezonja is trying(failing) but actually trying, he has to adjust his body language and effort in order to get more court time.
I definitely see your point here. With Mitch it's absolutely clear that coming off the bench and being cleared to be aggressive is the best of both worlds approach. With Knox, I can see that argument as well. His motor questions are something even he has acknowledged. But I still think that crashes and burns at Dotson getting benched. He was good before he got benched and was good when he came back in. There wasn't anything to fix with him. I'd put it this way; if you focus on Mitch, Knox and Frank then for sure there's logic to moving them to the bench (something I don't take issue with). If you look at Dotson, Kanter, Hezonja and Burke though; there's no difference from what they did before or after getting benched. Burke was always a volume scorer and I'd argue he's been even worse about forcing the issue for himself since that first little run he had when he got back. Kanter is Kanter. Hezonja might have found something against the Bucks, but the rest of his starts were no different from his bench play either. All of that is to say, if you put just the youngest and rawest players in a vaccuum then there's decent rationale for why they had their roles reduced; but if you look at the rest of the roster then there are examples of guys in shifting roles that have nothing to do with changing their games.
To clarify though, I'm not arguing that this is good or bad as an approach. I'm only saying that the approach isn't so much "eat what you kill" and more "how can I get the most production without upsetting you." That's why I mention the interviews from Burke, Hezonja and Kanter...to varying degrees (I ordered it best reaction to worst) each of those dude expressed some concern over DNP's which is a real contrast to Dot. Dotson responded well for sure; but Kanter couldn't even accept 30+ mpg off the bench without making scenes.
On that development goals tip; I agree with you that it's not just about minutes but minutes utilized the right way. My theory here though is that a coach can impact that moreso than some others here probably believe. I've been asking to run plays directly for Knox over the past couple of weeks; and I'd speculate that running just a couple of plays for Knox early had a bigger impact than bad press did even though that's the prevailing narrative. Pure speculation here, but I think you can get a bigger push for a player in a certain direction with the plays you call and role you place them in on the floor than by benching them for mistakes. Granted, you can go about it using the bench (especially early in their career) but I just see a different potentially more productive avenue...especially because we're not worried about wins.
Again, as always, I respect your stance, however, I'm going to disagree(knowing I could be wrong) here. We all know that balance is important. We want defense for 48 minutes...we NEED defense in the second half and 4th. As stated, Mitch getting time in the 1st and gets into foul trouble derails the development of our youth who need to see what the game plays like w/ Mitch as defensive anchor.
Hell yeah, I respect your viewpoint and approach to these discussions too. I like that we can chop it up over a disagreement without resorting to a strawman and that you address the thoughts in a complete fashion. Makes for both of us to learn and see things through wider perspective. Definitely agreed on Mitch, but as I've mentioned above I don't think the approach has been cohesive across the roster. THJ and Trier are two players I'd like to see more accountability from on the defensive end and that's because I see them with better defensive potential than we're getting. I will say I'm impressed with Mudiay specifically...he's walked the walk on both ends when it comes to showing and proving so far.
Breh, if dad says, his plan is to take us to disney world hell or high water and mid way to disney, a flat tire, bathroom stop, etc happens...if we stop, he doesn't mean he isn't sticking to the plan.
The point is, there are many variables that have to be taken into consideration, however, eat what you kill may still be the overarching goal.
I can like the example and breakdown. I can see that for sure. I'd say that I agree that Fiz has the same overarching goal which is player development. You can see it in some of these guys already. But I think both "grit and grind" and "eat what you kill" falls more in the "hell or high water" figurative speak than anything we're actually seeing in practice. I actually blame that somewhat for the guards turning playmaking into the third option (drive, pull-up THEN pass on the totem pole). Not to keep harping on play calls for Knox, but he went from forcing shots to doing so much more and again I don't pin that on anything moreso than confidence that he was going to get the ball more than just once or twice in his time out there. He didn't have to rush or force things because the ball was really traveling around and I loved that.
Here, I understand.
I do trust Fiz but I'd have to go out on a serious reach to try to predict what his algorithm is in deciding how he's dealing w/ the above.
I'll say that I wholeheartedly see why you have this opinion; but like Dotson & Mudiay's performances after a stretch of DNPs...I'm willing to bet it's not as simple as we think it is and FIz seems to know what he's doing when it comes to getting the best out of his players - veterans & youth - and regarding seeing incremental improvements as the year progresses. <--Other than Frank. Although, the "Fizdale Special" involving DNPs if only now happening w/ Frank and we will see if it seems to benefit Frankie like it did many of his peers.
Respect.
I feel you here too fam. Dot and Mudiay are serious success stories early on. Mitch has been growing defensively from day one (how about his defense on Giannis, if it wasn't a Saturday afternoon game my recap woulda been all about that). Knox has finally flashed the summer league upside we saw. Even Burke had a temporary wake up call and Hezonja finally showed some buy-in too. I don't want my complaints to be misconstrued as saying Fiz is doing poorly. He's done an pretty incredible job all things considered; but my concerns only fall to a handful of players that have a definite future here. So as impressed as I am with Mudiay and Vonleh especially; I'm hoping that by February we're seeing a clear focus on Mitch, Dot, Zo, Frank and Knox (technically THJ too but he's already getting that). There are real signs that Fiz is more or less taking it slow with the raw cats, so I'm good with waiting until then. I just want us to hit April knowing exactly what we need to target in the offseason and what roles those five kids are best suited to play in 2019/2020. To that end, I think we all have the same goals except for a couple of trolls that just show up to complain.