Retirees over 60 "not having daily drivers" is just incredibly wrong and borderline stupid, that's my only retort to this going forward.You are both very obviously wrong. but go ahead and dikk ride each other.
Retirees over 60 "not having daily drivers" is just incredibly wrong and borderline stupid, that's my only retort to this going forward.You are both very obviously wrong. but go ahead and dikk ride each other.
I didn't mean that did not have daily drivers. I was saying that they weren't daily drivers. Retirees. It is common knowledge that they put far less mileage into a vehicle than younger owners.Retirees over 60 "not having daily drivers" is just incredibly wrong and borderline stupid, that's my only retort to this going forward.
These were literally your words, i didn't add or remove any context:I didn't mean that did not have daily drivers. I was saying that they weren't daily drivers. Retirees. It is common knowledge that they put far less mileage into a vehicle than younger owners.
Your only retort is a slick attempt at a goalpost move to attack the semantics of my post rather than support your bad faith argument., and your overall point is still incorrect.
I'm moving on.retired 60+ millionaires don't have daily drivers breh
i just explained what i meant there is no need to try to argue otherwise. Your primary argument is still wrong. Old people aren't buying new cars every three years. And the majority of them own their vehicle they aren't leasing to their grave. these are facts not opinions. You are wrong.These were literally your words, i didn't add or remove any context:
I'm moving on.
That’s not what theconversation was about. You can move the goalpost after your L all you want.The numbers clearly correlate the frequency leasing a new car purchase to a younger demographic. Older people are not running their cars into the ground. Putting high mileage on them or getting into wrecks nearly as often.
I disagree with this post. But you werent part of it anyway so do you.That’s not what theconversation was about.
Nah I’m not wrong.You are both very obviously wrong. but go ahead and dikk ride each other.
I didn't mean that did not have daily drivers. I was saying that they weren't daily drivers. Retirees. It is common knowledge that they put far less mileage into a vehicle than younger owners.
Your only retort is a slick attempt at a goalpost move to attack the semantics of my post rather than support your bad faith argument., and your overall point is still incorrect.
My post was in response to the comments that the guy made in the video. Which he alluded to the fact that at his dealership. It isn't millionaire leasing car.60 isn’t that old. I live around some of the richest 60 year olds in the country and they’re driving everyday. Now 80+ you might be more accurate.
My post was in response to the comments that the guy made in the video. Which he alluded to the fact that at his dealership. It isn't millionaire leasing car.
He said most millionaires are retired and aren't leasing cars. I equated that with being 60+. Not 60 years old exactly. 60+.
I agree with the dealership owner. not with yall.
Whats waste though?When you work hard for your money you’re not gonna waste it.
The exotic cars you see celebs driving around are mostly leased out from the record label or their management team and when the time comes to recoup the car disappears. They come back and repossess it.
It's all about image. Yes, some celebrities get to the point where they can afford all these cars but most of them it's just for show.
It’s not that they’re broke… it’s just a large portion of the celebs we see live check to check. Yes, in theory they have more money, but it’s all subjective, as they are in the same amount of debt a 9-5 person has. Only difference is, their everyday purchases are a bit nicer than most lol. They’re struggling to pay their rent/mortgage the same way a middle class individual is.The more money I make and the older I get the more I realize the majority of people don’t know what broke means.